Cato v. Darst, et al.
Filing
14
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/25/2014 DENYING, without prejudice, plaintiff's 13 motion for leave to amend. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JAMES CATO,
12
13
14
No. 2:14-cv-0959 TLN KJN P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
M. DARST, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action seeking
relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On June 12, 2014, plaintiff filed a motion for leave to amend his complaint. Plaintiff’s
20
motion was not, however, accompanied by a proposed amended complaint. As a prisoner,
21
plaintiff’s pleadings are subject to evaluation by this court pursuant to the in forma pauperis
22
statute. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Because plaintiff did not submit a proposed amended complaint,
23
the court is unable to evaluate it.
24
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s June 12, 2014 motion for leave
25
to amend (ECF No. 13) is denied without prejudice.
26
Dated: June 25, 2014
27
28
Cat959.10b
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?