Cato v. Darst, et al.

Filing 40

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/17/2015 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS are ADOPTED in FULL 32 ; and Plaintiff's request to file an amended complaint 26 is DENIED. (Reader, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JAMES CATO,

12
13
14

No. 2:14-cv-0959 TLN KJN P
Plaintiff,

v.

ORDER

M. DARST, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief

18

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

19

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

20

On January 23, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

21

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to

22

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed

23

objections to the findings and recommendations. Defendants filed a reply to Plaintiff’s

24

objections.

25

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this

26

Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the

27

Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper

28

analysis.
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed January 23, 2015, are adopted in full; and

3

2. Plaintiff’s request to file an amended complaint (ECF No. 26) is denied.

4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6
7

Dated: April 17, 2015

8
9

Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2