Bell v. Duffy, et al.

Filing 17

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 7/30/14 ADOPTING IN FULL 10 Findings and Recommendations. Plaintiff's claims alleging defendants improperly processed his administrative appeals and improperly charged plaintiff two filing fees, contained in 1 Petition are DISMISSED. (Meuleman, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANNY BELL, 12 No. 2:14-cv-0965-GEB-KJN-P Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 A. PAYAN, et al., 15 ORDER Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On May 9, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 21 were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings 22 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to 23 the findings and recommendations. 24 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 27 1. The findings and recommendations filed May 9, 2014, are adopted in full; and 28 2. Plaintiff’s claims alleging defendants improperly processed his administrative appeals 1 1 and improperly charged plaintiff two filing fees, contained in his complaint filed April 18, 2014, 2 are dismissed. 3 Dated: July 30, 2014 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?