Emerson v. Foulk, et al.

Filing 40

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/4/2015 DENYING 39 Motion for Reconsideration. (Zignago, K.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

SCOTT EMERSON,

12

No. 2:14-cv-0972 TLN CKD P

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

F. FOULK, et al.,

15

ORDER

Defendants.

16
17

On August 20, 2015, the Magistrate Judge issued an order denying Plaintiff’s motion for

18

appointment of counsel. On October 20, 2015, Plaintiff constructively filed a request for

19

reconsideration of that order. Local Rule 303(b) states “rulings by Magistrate Judges . . . shall be

20

final if no reconsideration thereof is sought from the Court within fourteen (14) days . . . from the

21

date of service of the ruling on the parties.” Plaintiff’s request for reconsideration of the

22

magistrate judge’s order of August 20, 2015 is therefore untimely.

23

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s request for reconsideration (ECF

24

No. 39) is denied.

25

Dated: December 4, 2015

26
27

Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

28
1