Emerson v. Foulk, et al.

Filing 7

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 5/8/2014 DISMISSING plaintiff's 5 application to proceed IFP, without prejudice; the Clerk shall send plaintiff a new ifp application; and plaintiff shall submit, within 30 days, a completed ifp application. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SCOTT EMERSON, 12 No. 2:14-cv-0972 CKD P Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 F. FOULK, et al., 15 ORDER Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983 and a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. 19 Plaintiff has not, however, filed his application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on the form 20 used by this district. Accordingly, plaintiff’s application will be dismissed and plaintiff will be 21 provided the opportunity to submit the application on the appropriate form. Plaintiff is cautioned 22 that he must also provide a certified copy of his prison trust account statement for the six month 23 period immediately preceding the filing of his complaint. 24 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 25 1. Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 5) is dismissed without 26 27 28 prejudice; 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner; and 1 1 3. Plaintiff shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, a completed 2 application to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff’s failure to comply with this order will result 3 in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 4 Dated: May 8, 2014 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 2/mp Emer0972.3d 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?