Bownds v. City of Citrus Heights et al

Filing 26

STIPULATION and ORDER 25 for DISMISSAL signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 1/26/2015. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1). (Marciel, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Law Offices of TONON & ASSOCIATES Post Office Box 2536 Truckee, California 96160 Tel. (530) 587-0333 Fax. (530) 587-1545 Gayle K. Tonon, Esq. (SBN 110427) Attorneys for Defendants: City of Citrus Heights, Citrus Heights Police Department, Carl Bookamer, Thomas Lamb and Joseph Rangel 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS; CITRUS) ) HEIGHTS POLICE DEPARTMENT and DOES) 1 through 50, inclusive, ) ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) NEAL BOWNDS, IT IS HEREBY and between counsel that the the parties to this 21 action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 22 41(a)(1). 23 Dated: January 12, 2015 26 designated COMPLAINT FILED: 06/27/2012 REMOVED : 04/24/2014 TRIAL DATE : 09/14/2015 action 25 their by STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND ORDER 20 24 through STIPULATED Case No. 2:14-cv-01007-JAM-CKD above-captioned THE LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL LUSK /s/Michael Lusk By: _____________________________ MICHAEL LUSK, ESQ. Attorney for Plaintiff, NEAL BOWNDS 27 28 _____________________________________________________________________ -1STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL 1 Dated: January 26, 2015 TONON & ASSOCIATES 2 /s/Gayle K. Tonon By: ______________________________ GAYLE K. TONON, ESQ. Attorney for Defendants, CARL BOOKAMER, THOMAS LAMB AND JOSEPH RANGEL 3 4 5 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 DATED: 1/26/2015 11 12 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ JUDGE OF THE EASTERN DISTRICT COURT 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 (CCH1202)P122914.StipDismissalOrder 28 _____________________________________________________________________ -2STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?