Bownds v. City of Citrus Heights et al
Filing
26
STIPULATION and ORDER 25 for DISMISSAL signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 1/26/2015. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1). (Marciel, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Law Offices of
TONON & ASSOCIATES
Post Office Box 2536
Truckee, California 96160
Tel. (530) 587-0333
Fax. (530) 587-1545
Gayle K. Tonon, Esq. (SBN 110427)
Attorneys for Defendants: City of Citrus
Heights, Citrus Heights Police Department,
Carl Bookamer, Thomas Lamb and Joseph Rangel
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS; CITRUS)
)
HEIGHTS POLICE DEPARTMENT and DOES)
1 through 50, inclusive,
)
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
NEAL BOWNDS,
IT
IS
HEREBY
and
between
counsel
that
the
the
parties
to
this
21
action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP
22
41(a)(1).
23
Dated: January 12, 2015
26
designated
COMPLAINT FILED: 06/27/2012
REMOVED
: 04/24/2014
TRIAL DATE
: 09/14/2015
action
25
their
by
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
AND ORDER
20
24
through
STIPULATED
Case No. 2:14-cv-01007-JAM-CKD
above-captioned
THE LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL LUSK
/s/Michael Lusk
By: _____________________________
MICHAEL LUSK, ESQ.
Attorney for Plaintiff,
NEAL BOWNDS
27
28
_____________________________________________________________________
-1STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
1
Dated: January 26, 2015
TONON & ASSOCIATES
2
/s/Gayle K. Tonon
By: ______________________________
GAYLE K. TONON, ESQ.
Attorney for Defendants,
CARL BOOKAMER, THOMAS LAMB
AND JOSEPH RANGEL
3
4
5
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10
DATED: 1/26/2015
11
12
/s/ John A. Mendez____________
HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ
JUDGE OF THE EASTERN DISTRICT
COURT
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
(CCH1202)P122914.StipDismissalOrder
28
_____________________________________________________________________
-2STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?