Argonaut-Midwest Ins. Co. v. Hoblit Motors, et al

Filing 14

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 2/9/2015 ORDERING that this action and all proceedings and claims thereto, including initial disclosures, are hereby STAYED until 6/1/2015, starting 2/2/2015. All applicable time periods and deadlines from the date of the start of the stay to the time when the stay is lifted are hereby VACATED. CASE STAYED. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 WILKE, FLEURY, HOFFELT, GOULD & BIRNEY, LLP GEORGE A. GUTHRIE (SBN 201263) 2 gguthrie@wilkefleury.com DANIEL J. FOSTER (SBN 238012) 3 dfoster@wilkefleury.com 400 Capitol Mall, Twenty-Second Floor 4 Sacramento, California 95814 5 Telephone: (916) 441-2430 Facsimile: (916) 442-6664 6 Attorneys for HOBLIT MOTORS, INC. dba 7 COLUSA COUNTY AUTO MART (erroneously sued and served as HOBLIT MOTORS, INC. 8 DBA COLUSA AUTO MART, INC.); HOBLIT ENTERPRISES, INC. (erroneously sued and 9 served as a dba of HOBLIT MOTORS, INC.); HOBLIT INVESTMENT PARTNERS 10 (erroneously sued and served as a dba of HOBLIT MOTORS, INC.); and HOBLIT 11 CHRYSLER JEEP DODGE (erroneously sued and served as HOBLIT DODGE CHRYSLER 12 JEEP) 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO DIVISION 15 16 ARGONAUT-MIDWEST INS. CO., a Texas corporation, 17 Plaintiff, 18 v. 19 HOBLIT MOTORS, INC. DBA HOBLIT 20 ENTERPRISES, INC. DBA COLUSA AUTO MART, INC. DBA HOBLIT INVESTMENT 21 PARTNERS; HOBLIT DODGE CHRYSLER JEEP; AMBER KESTERSON, individually 22 and as guardian ad litem for AK, GK and JK; TONY KESTERSON; STEVEN 23 KESTERSON; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, 24 Case No. 2:14-cv-01012-WBS-CKD JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY CASE UNTIL JUNE 1, 2015 Defendants. 25 STIPULATION 26 A. On November 26, 2012, AMBER KESTERSON, individually and as guardian ad litem 27 for AK, GK and JK; TONY KESTERSON; and STEVEN KESTERSON filed a lawsuit against 28 W ILK E , F LEURY , H O FFELT , G O ULD & B IRNEY , LLP ATTOR NE YS AT LAW SACRA ME NTO 1201180.1 -1JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY CASE UNTIL JUNE 1, 2015 1 numerous Defendants including HOBLIT MOTORS; HOBLIT ENTERPRISES, INC.; and HOBLIT 2 INVESTMENT PARTNERS; in the Colusa County Superior Court, Case Number CV 23933 (the 3 “Underlying Action”). 4 B. On April 24, 2014, Plaintiff ARGONAUT-MIDWEST INS. CO. (“ARGONAUT”) 5 filed a Complaint for Declaratory Relief in this Court seeking declarations (1) that none of the 6 Defendants is, or at any time was, entitled to a defense under an ARGONAUT policy of insurance; (2) 7 that none of the Defendants is, or at any time was, entitled to indemnity under an ARGONAUT policy 8 of insurance; and (3) for reimbursement of all defense costs and fees incurred by ARGONAUT in 9 connection with the Underlying Action. 10 C. The Underlying Action is currently being litigated in the Colusa County Superior Court 11 with a trial scheduled to commence on April 14, 2015. 12 D. The Parties to the instant action believe that a stay of this coverage action is appropriate 13 pending resolution of the Underlying Action based upon, among other things, what the Parties believe 14 to be an overlap in factual issues in the Underlying Action and this coverage action. 15 THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by ARGONAUT-MIDWEST INS. CO.; 16 HOBLIT MOTORS, INC. dba COLUSA COUNTY AUTO MART (erroneously sued and served as 17 HOBLIT MOTORS, INC. DBA COLUSA AUTO MART, INC.); HOBLIT ENTERPRISES, INC. 18 (erroneously sued and served as a dba of HOBLIT MOTORS, INC.); HOBLIT INVESTMENT 19 PARTNERS (erroneously sued and served as a dba of HOBLIT MOTORS, INC.); and HOBLIT 20 CHRYSLER JEEP DODGE (erroneously sued and served as HOBLIT DODGE CHRYSLER JEEP); 21 AMBER KESTERSON, individually and as guardian ad litem for AK, GK and JK; TONY 22 KESTERSON; and STEVEN KESTERSON, as follows: 23 1. All claims and proceedings in this coverage action, including initial disclosures, should 24 be stayed until June 1, 2015, starting on February 2, 2015. 25 2. This Stipulation is made without prejudice to either party’s rights, including the right to 26 move the Court for an additional stay of this action. 27 3. By entering into this Stipulation, none of the Parties waive any defenses, rights, or 28 privileges. W ILK E , F LEURY , H O FFELT , G O ULD & B IRNEY , LLP ATTOR NE YS AT LAW SACRA ME NTO 1201180.1 -2JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY CASE UNTIL JUNE 1, 2015 1 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 2 3 DATED: February 2, 2015 4 WILKE, FLEURY, HOFFELT, GOULD & BIRNEY, LLP 5 6 By: 7 DANIEL J. FOSTER Attorneys for HOBLIT MOTORS, INC. dba COLUSA COUNTY AUTO MART (erroneously sued and served as HOBLIT MOTORS, INC. DBA COLUSA AUTO MART, INC.); HOBLIT ENTERPRISES, INC. (erroneously sued and served as a dba of HOBLIT MOTORS, INC.); HOBLIT INVESTMENT PARTNERS (erroneously sued and served as a dba of HOBLIT MOTORS, INC.); and HOBLIT CHRYSLER JEEP DODGE (erroneously sued and served as HOBLIT DODGE CHRYSLER JEEP) 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 /s/ DATED: February ___, 2015 LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL J. TREZZA 15 16 By: 17 /s/ MICHAEL J. TREZZA Attorneys for THE KESTERSONS 18 19 DATED: February ___, 2015 HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP 20 21 By: 22 /s/ RAY TAMADDON Attorneys for ARGONAUT-MIDWEST INS. CO. 23 24 25 26 27 28 W ILK E , F LEURY , H O FFELT , G O ULD & B IRNEY , LLP ATTOR NE YS AT LAW SACRA ME NTO 1201180.1 -3JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY CASE UNTIL JUNE 1, 2015 1 ORDER 2 Pursuant to the stipulation of the Parties: 3 1. This action and all proceedings and claims thereto, including initial disclosures, are 4 hereby stayed until June 1, 2015, starting February 2, 2015. 5 2. All applicable time periods and deadlines from the date of the start of the stay to the 6 time when the stay is lifted are hereby vacated. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 Dated: February 9, 2015 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 W ILK E , F LEURY , H O FFELT , G O ULD & B IRNEY , LLP ATTOR NE YS AT LAW SACRA ME NTO 1201180.1 -4JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY CASE UNTIL JUNE 1, 2015

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?