Argonaut-Midwest Ins. Co. v. Hoblit Motors, et al
Filing
14
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 2/9/2015 ORDERING that this action and all proceedings and claims thereto, including initial disclosures, are hereby STAYED until 6/1/2015, starting 2/2/2015. All applicable time periods and deadlines from the date of the start of the stay to the time when the stay is lifted are hereby VACATED. CASE STAYED. (Zignago, K.)
1 WILKE, FLEURY, HOFFELT, GOULD & BIRNEY, LLP
GEORGE A. GUTHRIE (SBN 201263)
2 gguthrie@wilkefleury.com
DANIEL J. FOSTER (SBN 238012)
3 dfoster@wilkefleury.com
400 Capitol Mall, Twenty-Second Floor
4 Sacramento, California 95814
5 Telephone:
(916) 441-2430
Facsimile:
(916) 442-6664
6
Attorneys for HOBLIT MOTORS, INC. dba
7 COLUSA COUNTY AUTO MART (erroneously
sued and served as HOBLIT MOTORS, INC.
8 DBA COLUSA AUTO MART, INC.); HOBLIT
ENTERPRISES, INC. (erroneously sued and
9 served as a dba of HOBLIT MOTORS, INC.);
HOBLIT INVESTMENT PARTNERS
10 (erroneously sued and served as a dba of
HOBLIT MOTORS, INC.); and HOBLIT
11 CHRYSLER JEEP DODGE (erroneously sued
and served as HOBLIT DODGE CHRYSLER
12 JEEP)
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO DIVISION
15
16 ARGONAUT-MIDWEST INS. CO., a Texas
corporation,
17
Plaintiff,
18
v.
19
HOBLIT MOTORS, INC. DBA HOBLIT
20 ENTERPRISES, INC. DBA COLUSA AUTO
MART, INC. DBA HOBLIT INVESTMENT
21 PARTNERS; HOBLIT DODGE CHRYSLER
JEEP; AMBER KESTERSON, individually
22 and as guardian ad litem for AK, GK and JK;
TONY KESTERSON; STEVEN
23 KESTERSON; and DOES 1-10, inclusive,
24
Case No. 2:14-cv-01012-WBS-CKD
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO STAY CASE UNTIL JUNE 1,
2015
Defendants.
25
STIPULATION
26
A.
On November 26, 2012, AMBER KESTERSON, individually and as guardian ad litem
27
for AK, GK and JK; TONY KESTERSON; and STEVEN KESTERSON filed a lawsuit against
28
W ILK E , F LEURY ,
H O FFELT , G O ULD &
B IRNEY , LLP
ATTOR NE YS
AT
LAW
SACRA ME NTO
1201180.1
-1JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY CASE UNTIL JUNE 1, 2015
1 numerous Defendants including HOBLIT MOTORS; HOBLIT ENTERPRISES, INC.; and HOBLIT
2 INVESTMENT PARTNERS; in the Colusa County Superior Court, Case Number CV 23933 (the
3 “Underlying Action”).
4
B.
On April 24, 2014, Plaintiff ARGONAUT-MIDWEST INS. CO. (“ARGONAUT”)
5 filed a Complaint for Declaratory Relief in this Court seeking declarations (1) that none of the
6 Defendants is, or at any time was, entitled to a defense under an ARGONAUT policy of insurance; (2)
7 that none of the Defendants is, or at any time was, entitled to indemnity under an ARGONAUT policy
8 of insurance; and (3) for reimbursement of all defense costs and fees incurred by ARGONAUT in
9 connection with the Underlying Action.
10
C.
The Underlying Action is currently being litigated in the Colusa County Superior Court
11 with a trial scheduled to commence on April 14, 2015.
12
D.
The Parties to the instant action believe that a stay of this coverage action is appropriate
13 pending resolution of the Underlying Action based upon, among other things, what the Parties believe
14 to be an overlap in factual issues in the Underlying Action and this coverage action.
15
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by ARGONAUT-MIDWEST INS. CO.;
16 HOBLIT MOTORS, INC. dba COLUSA COUNTY AUTO MART (erroneously sued and served as
17 HOBLIT MOTORS, INC. DBA COLUSA AUTO MART, INC.); HOBLIT ENTERPRISES, INC.
18 (erroneously sued and served as a dba of HOBLIT MOTORS, INC.); HOBLIT INVESTMENT
19 PARTNERS (erroneously sued and served as a dba of HOBLIT MOTORS, INC.); and HOBLIT
20 CHRYSLER JEEP DODGE (erroneously sued and served as HOBLIT DODGE CHRYSLER JEEP);
21 AMBER KESTERSON, individually and as guardian ad litem for AK, GK and JK; TONY
22 KESTERSON; and STEVEN KESTERSON, as follows:
23
1.
All claims and proceedings in this coverage action, including initial disclosures, should
24 be stayed until June 1, 2015, starting on February 2, 2015.
25
2.
This Stipulation is made without prejudice to either party’s rights, including the right to
26 move the Court for an additional stay of this action.
27
3.
By entering into this Stipulation, none of the Parties waive any defenses, rights, or
28 privileges.
W ILK E , F LEURY ,
H O FFELT , G O ULD &
B IRNEY , LLP
ATTOR NE YS
AT
LAW
SACRA ME NTO
1201180.1
-2JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY CASE UNTIL JUNE 1, 2015
1 IT IS SO STIPULATED.
2
3 DATED: February 2, 2015
4
WILKE, FLEURY, HOFFELT,
GOULD & BIRNEY, LLP
5
6
By:
7
DANIEL J. FOSTER
Attorneys for HOBLIT MOTORS, INC. dba
COLUSA COUNTY AUTO MART (erroneously
sued and served as HOBLIT MOTORS, INC.
DBA COLUSA AUTO MART, INC.); HOBLIT
ENTERPRISES, INC. (erroneously sued and
served as a dba of HOBLIT MOTORS, INC.);
HOBLIT INVESTMENT PARTNERS
(erroneously sued and served as a dba of HOBLIT
MOTORS, INC.); and HOBLIT CHRYSLER
JEEP DODGE (erroneously sued and served as
HOBLIT DODGE CHRYSLER JEEP)
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
/s/
DATED: February ___, 2015
LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL J. TREZZA
15
16
By:
17
/s/
MICHAEL J. TREZZA
Attorneys for THE KESTERSONS
18
19 DATED: February ___, 2015
HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP
20
21
By:
22
/s/
RAY TAMADDON
Attorneys for ARGONAUT-MIDWEST INS. CO.
23
24
25
26
27
28
W ILK E , F LEURY ,
H O FFELT , G O ULD &
B IRNEY , LLP
ATTOR NE YS
AT
LAW
SACRA ME NTO
1201180.1
-3JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY CASE UNTIL JUNE 1, 2015
1
ORDER
2
Pursuant to the stipulation of the Parties:
3
1.
This action and all proceedings and claims thereto, including initial disclosures, are
4 hereby stayed until June 1, 2015, starting February 2, 2015.
5
2.
All applicable time periods and deadlines from the date of the start of the stay to the
6 time when the stay is lifted are hereby vacated.
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8 Dated: February 9, 2015
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
W ILK E , F LEURY ,
H O FFELT , G O ULD &
B IRNEY , LLP
ATTOR NE YS
AT
LAW
SACRA ME NTO
1201180.1
-4JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY CASE UNTIL JUNE 1, 2015
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?