Mason v. Martinez, et al.

Filing 51

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 04/12/16 ordering that parties shall have until 5/27/16 to file pretrial motions. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHAVOUGUE A. MASON, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:14-cv-1041 MCE AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER M.L. MARTINEZ, et al., Defendants. 16 17 By order filed December 19, 2014, the deadline for completing discovery was set for 18 April 10, 2015, and the pretrial motion deadline was set for July 10, 2015. ECF No. 19 at 5. On 19 March 2, 2015, defendants filed a motion for partial summary judgment based on plaintiff’s 20 failure to exhaust his administrative remedies (ECF No. 22) and on April 22, 2015, plaintiff filed 21 a motion to compel (ECF No. 29). Defendants then requested that the deadline for pretrial 22 motions be modified (ECF No. 35) and the July 10, 2015 pretrial motion deadline was vacated, to 23 be re-set upon resolution of the motions for partial summary judgment and to compel (ECF No. 24 36). This court proceeded to issue findings and recommendations on the summary-judgment 25 motion (ECF No. 42) and, in ruling on the motion to compel, denied plaintiff’s request to re-open 26 discovery (ECF No. 48 at 15). The findings and recommendations on the motion for partial 27 summary judgment have now been adopted in full by the district judge. ECF No. 50. Since the 28 partial motion for summary judgment and motion to compel have been resolved and discovery in 1 1 this matter remains closed, the court will now set a new deadline for pretrial motions to allow the 2 parties an opportunity to file merit-based motions for summary judgment. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall have until May 27, 2016, 4 to file pretrial motions. 5 DATED: April 12, 2016 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?