USA v. Approximately $538,155.00 seized from ING Direct checking account # 156773818 et al

Filing 7

RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 5/28/14 ORDERING that these actions are related. (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
APPROXIMATELY $546,104.80 SEIZED
)
FROM WACHOVIA BANK ACCOUNT NUMBER )
2000019689368,
)
)
Defendant.
)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
MISCELLANEOUS ART, JEWELRY, AND
)
CURRENCY LISTED IN EXHIBIT A,
)
)
)
Defendants.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
ANY INTEREST OR PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS )
ASSOCIATED WITH “LOAN 1 OF 2”
)
REPRESENTED BY CHECK #81600 FOR
)
$2,500,000, PAYABLE TO DREW
)
ESTATES LLC DATED JANUARY 2, 2011, )
ET AL.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
1

Case No. 2:14-CV-01242 JAM-AC
RELATED CASE ORDER

Case No. 2:14-CV-01074 JAM-AC

Case No. 2:14-CV-01060 JAM-AC

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
APPROXIMATELY $538,155.00 SEIZED
)
FROM ING DIRECT CHECKING ACCOUNT
)
#156773818, ET AL.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
APPROXIMATELY $155,000.00 IN THE
)
FORM OF A CASHIER’S CHECK, ET AL., )
)
Defendants.
)
)

Case No. 2:14-CV-01048 JAM-AC

Case No. 2:14-CV-01035 JAM-AC

Examination of the above-entitled actions reveals that these

13

actions are related within the meaning of Local Rule 123 (E.D. Cal.

14

2005).

15

judge and magistrate judge is likely to affect a substantial

16

savings of judicial effort and is also likely to be convenient for

17

the parties.

18

Accordingly, the assignment of the matters to the same

The parties should be aware that relating the cases under

19

Local Rule 123 merely has the result that these actions are

20

assigned to the same judge and magistrate judge; no consolidation

21

of the actions is affected.

22

court, related cases are generally assigned to the judge and

23

magistrate judge to whom the first filed action was assigned.

Under the regular practice of this

24

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that these actions are related.

25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26

Dated:

May 28, 2014

27

/s/ John A. Mendez________________

28

U. S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
2