Rodriguez v. Beard et al
Filing
123
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 12/7/2016 ORDERING 118 upon reconsideration, the orders of the magistrate judge filed 10/28/2016 114 are AFFIRMED.(Reader, L)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
DEAN C. RODRIGUEZ,
9
10
11
No. 2: 14-cv-1049 MCE KJN P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
JEFFREY BEARD, et al.,,
12
Defendant.
13
14
On November 16, 2016, plaintiff filed “objections” to the October 28, 2016 orders by the
15
magistrate judge denying plaintiff’s motions to compel and for certification of subpoena. (ECF
16
No. 114.) Plaintiff also objects to the October 28, 2016 order deferring ruling on plaintiff’s
17
motion for additional discovery brought pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(d). (Id.)
18
The undersigned construes plaintiff’s objections as a request for reconsideration.
19
Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless
20
“clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Id. Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it
21
does not appear that the magistrate judge’s rulings were clearly erroneous or contrary to law.
22
Therefore, upon reconsideration, the orders of the magistrate judge filed October 28, 2016
23
are affirmed.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 7, 2016
25
26
27
28
1
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
