Rodriguez v. Beard et al
Filing
161
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 2/19/2020 ADOPTING in FULL 157 Findings and Recommendations. Plaintiff's claims in the second amended complaint alleging an inadequate law library, inadequate law library access and race-based lockdowns on 3/2/2011 and 11/9/2012 are DISMISSED, and DENYING 26 Motion to Amend the Complaint. (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DEAN C. RODRIGUEZ,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:14-cv-01049 MCE KJN P
v.
ORDER
JEFFREY BEARD, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On December 6, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
20
21
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
22
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
24
25
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
26
court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
27
analysis.
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed December 6, 2019, are adopted in full;
3
2. Plaintiff’s claims in the second amended complaint alleging an inadequate law library,
4
inadequate law library access and race-based lockdowns on March 2, 2011 and November 9,
5
2012 are dismissed; and
6
3. Plaintiff’s motion to amend (ECF No. 26) is denied.
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
Dated: February 19, 2020
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?