Rodriguez v. Beard et al

Filing 81

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/15/16 GRANTING 77 Motion to conduct plaintiffs deposition via videoconference; Nothing in this Order shall be interpreted as requiring any penal institution to obtain videoconferencing equipment if it is not already available. A court reporter shall be present at the penal institution where plaintiff is incarcerated to record the deposition.(Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10
DEAN C. RODRIGUEZ,

No. 2:14-cv-1049 MCE KJN P

11
ORDER
12

Plaintiff,
vs.

13
JEFFREY BEARD, et al.,
14
Defendants

15
16
17
18

Defendant MATIS seeks an order from the Court, pursuant to Federal Rule of
Civil Procedure 30(b)(4), to permit defendant’s counsel to conduct the deposition of

19
plaintiff DEAN RODRIGUEZ via videoconference.
20
Having read defense counsel’s request,

21
22

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

23

1.

24

videoconference is GRANTED.

25
26

Defendant’s request to conduct plaintiff’s deposition via

2.

Nothing in this Order shall be interpreted as requiring any penal institution

to obtain videoconferencing equipment if it is not already available.

27
28

////
1

1
2
3

3. A court reporter shall be present at the penal institution where plaintiff is
incarcerated to record the deposition.
Dated: January 15, 2016

4
5
6
7
8

Rod1049.dep

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2