Barnes v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
21
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/20/2015 ORDERING 20 that the time for defendant to file a cross-motion for summary judgment to 2/17/2015 is APPROVED. (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
DONNA L. CALVERT
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
THEOPHOUS H. REAGANS, CSBN 189450
Special Assistant United States Attorney
160 Spear Street, Ste. 800
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: (415) 977-8938
Facsimile: (415) 744-0134
Email: theophous.reagans@ssa.gov
10
11
Attorneys for Defendant
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
) No. 2:14-CV-01071-CKD
)
) STIPULATION TO EXTEND
Plaintiff,
) BRIEFING SCHEDULE
)
v.
)
)
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
)
Acting Commissioner of Social
)
Security,
)
)
Defendant.
_______________________________ )
SARAH MICHELLE BARNES,
The parties stipulate and agree, subject to the Court’s approval, that the time for
25
Defendant to file a Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment to February 17, 2015. This
26
stipulation is necessary because Defendant needs additional time to review the
27
defensibility of this case. This is Defendant’s second request for an extension. The
28
-1-
1
parties request this extension in good faith, with no intent to prolong proceedings unduly.
2
Defendant apologizes for any inconvenience caused by this delay.
3
4
Dated: JANUARY 16, 2015
/s/ Joseph C. Fraulob
(telephone authorization)
JOSEPH C. FRAULOB
Attorney for Plaintiff
Dated: JANUARY 16, 2015
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
THEOPHOUS H. REAGANS
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
By:
/s/ Theophous H. Reagans
THEOPHOUS H. REAGANS
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant
13
14
15
16
17
ORDER
18
19
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.
20
21
22
23
24
Dated: January 20, 2015
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?