Soga v. County of Nevada et al

Filing 42

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/10/16 ORDERING After reviewing the parties' stipulation, the documents already submitted in preparation for trial, and having requested further information from the parties on their availability, the parties' stipulation is APPROVED IN PART; the Trial of this matter is reset for 9/12/16 at 9:00 a.m; with the Final Pretrial Conference reset for 8/18/16 at 2:30 p.m. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 PORTER | SCOTT 350 University Avenue, Suite 200 Sacramento, CA 95825 TEL: 916.929.1481 FAX: 916.927.3706 11 LAW OFFICES OF KERRY S. SCHAFFER Kerry S. Schaffer, SBN 84706 3527 Hacienda Drive Santa Rosa, CA 95405 TEL: 707.575.4075 FAX: 707.575.8075 Attorney for Plaintiff KATHLEEN SOGA A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION Carl L. Fessenden, SBN 161494 Ariana A. Van Alstine, SBN 296624 350 University Avenue, Suite 200 Sacramento, California 95825 TEL: 916.929.1481 FAX: 916.927.3706 Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF NEVADA and ROLF KLEINHANS 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 15 KATHLEEN SOGA CASE NO. 2:14-cv-01084-KJM-KJN Plaintiff 16 STIPULATION REGARDING TRIAL 17 v. 18 COUNTY OF NEVADA, a public entity, ROLF KLEINHANS, and individual, and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, 19 Complaint Filed: May 1, 2014 TRIAL: 06/13/2016 PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE: 05/18/2016 20 21 AND ORDER CONTINUANCE OF Defendants ___________________________________/ 22 Plaintiff KATHLEEN SOGA and Defendants COUNTY OF NEVADA and ROLF 23 KLEINHANS, by and through their respective counsel of record, enter into the following 24 Stipulation regarding the continuation of trial. 25 I. 26 PROCEDURAL STATUS 27 Trial was scheduled for May 2, 2016. As a ruling on Defendant’s Motion for Summary 28 Judgment is pending, on April 11, 2016, the Court moved the trial date to June 13, 2016, and the {01542660.DOCX} 1 STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL 1 Pre-Trial Conference to May 18, 2016. 2 II. 3 GROUNDS FOR A CONTINUANCE 4 On the Court’s own motion, on April 11, 2016, the trial in this matter was continued to 5 June 13, 2016. A new Pre-Trial Conference was set for May 18, 2016. The new trial date 6 conflicts with other trials both counsel for Plaintiff and counsel for Defendant have at that time. 7 Counsel have met and conferred regarding alternative trial dates. They are both available, along 8 with the witnesses, in early December 2016. 9 III. 10 REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE PORTER | SCOTT 350 University Avenue, Suite 200 Sacramento, CA 95825 TEL: 916.929.1481 FAX: 916.927.3706 11 12 13 14 Based on the foregoing, the parties stipulate and agree to a continuance of the current trial date. It is requested that the trial be continued to the week of December 5th or 12th, 2016. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: May 10, 2016 LAW OFFICES OF KERRY S. SCHAFFER 15 By 16 17 18 Dated: May 10, 2016 /s/Kerry S. Schaffer (authorized 04/21/2016) Kerry S. Schaffer Attorneys for Plaintiff KATHLEEN SOGA PORTER SCOTT 19 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 20 By 21 22 23 /s/Carl L. Fessenden Carl L. Fessenden Ariana A. Van Alstine Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF NEVADA and ROLF KLEINHANS 24 25 26 27 28 {01542660.DOCX} 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL 1 2 ORDER After reviewing the parties’ stipulation, the documents already submitted in preparation for 3 trial, and having requested further information from the parties on their availability, the parties’ 4 stipulation is APPROVED IN PART. Trial of this matter is reset for September 12, 2016 at 9 5 a.m., with the final pretrial conference reset for August 18, 2016 at 2:30 p.m. 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: May 10, 2016. 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE PORTER | SCOTT 350 University Avenue, Suite 200 Sacramento, CA 95825 TEL: 916.929.1481 FAX: 916.927.3706 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 {01542660.DOCX} 3 STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?