Soga v. County of Nevada et al
Filing
42
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/10/16 ORDERING After reviewing the parties' stipulation, the documents already submitted in preparation for trial, and having requested further information from the parties on their availability, the parties' stipulation is APPROVED IN PART; the Trial of this matter is reset for 9/12/16 at 9:00 a.m; with the Final Pretrial Conference reset for 8/18/16 at 2:30 p.m. (Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
PORTER | SCOTT
350 University Avenue, Suite 200
Sacramento, CA 95825
TEL: 916.929.1481
FAX: 916.927.3706
11
LAW OFFICES OF KERRY S. SCHAFFER
Kerry S. Schaffer, SBN 84706
3527 Hacienda Drive
Santa Rosa, CA 95405
TEL: 707.575.4075
FAX: 707.575.8075
Attorney for Plaintiff KATHLEEN SOGA
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
Carl L. Fessenden, SBN 161494
Ariana A. Van Alstine, SBN 296624
350 University Avenue, Suite 200
Sacramento, California 95825
TEL: 916.929.1481
FAX: 916.927.3706
Attorneys for Defendants
COUNTY OF NEVADA and ROLF KLEINHANS
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
15
KATHLEEN SOGA
CASE NO. 2:14-cv-01084-KJM-KJN
Plaintiff
16
STIPULATION
REGARDING
TRIAL
17
v.
18
COUNTY OF NEVADA, a public entity,
ROLF KLEINHANS, and individual, and
DOES 1 through 20, inclusive,
19
Complaint Filed: May 1, 2014
TRIAL: 06/13/2016
PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE: 05/18/2016
20
21
AND
ORDER
CONTINUANCE
OF
Defendants
___________________________________/
22
Plaintiff KATHLEEN SOGA and Defendants COUNTY OF NEVADA and ROLF
23
KLEINHANS, by and through their respective counsel of record, enter into the following
24
Stipulation regarding the continuation of trial.
25
I.
26
PROCEDURAL STATUS
27
Trial was scheduled for May 2, 2016. As a ruling on Defendant’s Motion for Summary
28
Judgment is pending, on April 11, 2016, the Court moved the trial date to June 13, 2016, and the
{01542660.DOCX}
1
STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL
1
Pre-Trial Conference to May 18, 2016.
2
II.
3
GROUNDS FOR A CONTINUANCE
4
On the Court’s own motion, on April 11, 2016, the trial in this matter was continued to
5
June 13, 2016. A new Pre-Trial Conference was set for May 18, 2016. The new trial date
6
conflicts with other trials both counsel for Plaintiff and counsel for Defendant have at that time.
7
Counsel have met and conferred regarding alternative trial dates. They are both available, along
8
with the witnesses, in early December 2016.
9
III.
10
REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE
PORTER | SCOTT
350 University Avenue, Suite 200
Sacramento, CA 95825
TEL: 916.929.1481
FAX: 916.927.3706
11
12
13
14
Based on the foregoing, the parties stipulate and agree to a continuance of the current trial
date. It is requested that the trial be continued to the week of December 5th or 12th, 2016.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: May 10, 2016
LAW OFFICES OF KERRY S. SCHAFFER
15
By
16
17
18
Dated: May 10, 2016
/s/Kerry S. Schaffer (authorized 04/21/2016)
Kerry S. Schaffer
Attorneys for Plaintiff KATHLEEN SOGA
PORTER SCOTT
19
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
20
By
21
22
23
/s/Carl L. Fessenden
Carl L. Fessenden
Ariana A. Van Alstine
Attorneys for Defendants
COUNTY OF NEVADA and
ROLF KLEINHANS
24
25
26
27
28
{01542660.DOCX}
2
STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL
1
2
ORDER
After reviewing the parties’ stipulation, the documents already submitted in preparation for
3
trial, and having requested further information from the parties on their availability, the parties’
4
stipulation is APPROVED IN PART. Trial of this matter is reset for September 12, 2016 at 9
5
a.m., with the final pretrial conference reset for August 18, 2016 at 2:30 p.m.
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: May 10, 2016.
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
PORTER | SCOTT
350 University Avenue, Suite 200
Sacramento, CA 95825
TEL: 916.929.1481
FAX: 916.927.3706
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
{01542660.DOCX}
3
STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?