Hopson v. Titan Auto Insurance of New Mexico, Inc. et al

Filing 6

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 6/25/14 ORDERING that Defendant Titan Auto Insurance of New Mexico, Inc. dba Titan Auto Insurance's time to respond to the Complaint is EXTENDED to 7/18/2014. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP
JAMES E. FITZGERALD (State Bar No. 108785)
ALLAN S. COHEN (State Bar No. 115532)
2029 Century Park East
Los Angeles, CA 90067-3086
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 310-556-5959
Email:
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
TITAN AUTO INSURANCE OF
NEW MEXICO, INC. dba
TITAN AUTO INSURANCE

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

11

KEITH HOPSON

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Plaintiff,
v.
TITAN AUTO INSURANCE OF NEW
MEXICO, INC., dba TITAN AUTO
INSURANCE, STAFFING SOLUTIONS,
INC., dba BALANCE STAFFING, ON
TRACK TRANSPORTATION, INC., T G JR
AND PATRICIA PARKER TRUST,
PATRICIA PARKER and DOES 1-10,
inclusive,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 2:14-cv-01090-MCE-DAD
STIPULATION RE: FURTHER
EXTENSION OF TIME FOR RESPONSE
TO COMPLAINT; ORDER

1

WHEREAS Defendant Titan Auto Insurance of New Mexico, Inc. dba Titan Auto

2

Insurance (“Titan”) was served with the Summons and Complaint in the above-captioned matter on

3

May 9, 2014;

4
5
6

WHEREAS Plaintiff and Titan previously entered into a Stipulation extending Titan’s time
to respond to June 27, 2014;
WHEREAS Defendants Staffing Solutions, Inc., dba Balance Staffing; On Track

7

Transportation, Inc.; T G Jr and Patricia Parker Trust; and Patricia Parker have not yet appeared in

8

the Action;

9
10
11

WHEREAS Titan is continuing to analyze the facts which pertain to its response to the
Complaint;
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by Plaintiff Keith Hopson and Defendant Titan, by and

12

through their respective counsel of record, that Titan’s time to respond to the Complaint is further

13

extended for a period of twenty-one days to July 18, 2014.

14
15

Dated: June 18, 2014

DANIEL MALAKAUSKAS

16
By:

17

/s/ Daniel Malakauskas
Daniel Malakauskas

18

Attorney for Plaintiff
Keith Hopson

19
20
21
22
23
24

Dated: June 18, 2014

STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP
JAMES E. FITZGERALD
ALLAN S. COHEN
By:

Allan S. Cohen

25
26
27

/s/ Allan S. Cohen

Attorneys for Defendant
TITAN AUTO INSURANCE OF NEW
MEXICO, INC. dba TITAN AUTO
INSURANCE

28
-1-

ORDER

1
2
3
4
5

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, Defendant Titan Auto Insurance of New Mexico, Inc.
dba Titan Auto Insurance’s time to respond to the Complaint is extended to July 18, 2014.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 25, 2014

6
7
8

2029 Century Park East
Los Angeles, California 90067-3086

STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2STIPULATION RE: FURTHER EXTENSION OF TIME FOR RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER
LA 51771424