Stuckey v. U.S.A. Trucking Inc. et al

Filing 63

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 7/22/16 ORDERING that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)

5

Rory C. Quintana, SBN 258747
QUINTANA HANAFI
PUNGPRAKEARTI, LLP
351 California St., Ste. 300
San Francisco, CA 94104
[phone], Ext. 101 (Tel.)
[phone] (Fax)
[e-mail]

6

Attorneys for Plaintiff Virgil Stuckey

1
2
3
4

7
8
9
10

YULI LAW OFFICES
Eliyahu Yuli Kaplunovsky (SBN 299178)
1669-2 Hollenbeck Ave. # 211
Sunnyvale, California 94087
[phone] (Tel)
[e-mail]

11
12

Attorneys for Defendants USA Trucking, Inc.
and Gurtej Singh

13
14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16
17
18
19
20
21

VIRGIL STUCKEY, an individual;

CASE NO. 2:14-cv-01091-JAM-DAD

Plaintiffs,
vs.
U.S.A. TRUCKING, INC., a California
corporation; GURTEJ SINGH, an individual,

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE

Defendants.

22
WHEREAS, Plaintiff Virgil Stuckey (herein “Plaintiff”) and Defendants U.S.A. Trucking,
23
Inc. and Gurtej Singh (herein collectively “Defendants”) (herein collectively “the Parties)
24
conducted mediation through the Court’s Volunteer Dispute Resolution Program (“VDRP”) on
25
July 6, 2016, and continued settlement discussions in the weeks thereafter., with the help of
26
27
28

mediator David Perrault;
WHEREAS, the Parties have settled all claims and causes of actions asserted by Plaintiff

-1Stuckey v. U.S.A. Trucking, Inc. CAND Case No. 2:14-cv-01091-JAM-DAD
Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice

1
2
3

in his Complaint;
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plaintiff and Defendants that the above-captioned
action, and all claims therein are dismissed with prejudice.

4
5

IT IS SO STIPULATED

6
7

Dated: July 22, 2016

QHP, LLP

8
9

By: __s/s Rory C. Quintana___________
Rory C. Quintana
Attorney for Plaintiff Virgil Stuckey

10
11
12
13

Dated: July 22, 2016

YULI LAW OFFICES

14

By: __/s/Eliyahu Yuli Kaplunovsky__
Eliyahu Yuli Kaplunovsky
Attorney for Defendants Gurtej Singh
and U.S.A. Trucking, Inc.

15
16
17
18
19

Filer’s Attestation: I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of the
document has been obtained by its signatory

20
21

By: __s/s Rory C. Quintana___________
Rory C. Quintana

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-

Stuckey v. U.S.A. Trucking, Inc. CAND Case No. 2:14-cv-01091-JAM-DAD
Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice

1
2
3

Based on the Parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing, it is hereby ORDERED that:
This action is dismissed with prejudice.

4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6
7

DATED: July 22, 2016

/s/ John A. Mendez
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-

Stuckey v. U.S.A. Trucking, Inc. CAND Case No. 2:14-cv-01091-JAM-DAD
Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice