Whelan v Donahoe
Filing
23
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/14/2014 ADOPTING IN FULL 18 Findings and Recommendations; GRANTING 8 Motion to Dismiss the 1 Complaint in part; DISMISSING all claims based on conduct other than the plaintiff's actual demotion. (Michel, G)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
HELEN WHELAN,
12
13
14
No. 2:14-cv-1096 TLN CKD PS
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
PATRICK DONAHOE,
15
Defendant.
16
17
18
19
Plaintiff filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States
Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c).
On October 3, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
20
which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the
21
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Objections to the findings
22
and recommendations have been filed.
23
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
24
Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
25
Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
26
analysis.
27
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
28
1. The findings and recommendations filed October 3, 2014 are adopted in full;
1
1
2. Defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint in part (ECF No. 8) is granted; and
2
3. All claims based on conduct other than Plaintiff’s actual demotion are dismissed.
3
4
Dated: November 14, 2014
5
6
7
8
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?