Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
24
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 2/4/15 ORDERING that the time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgement is EXTENDED from 2/3/15 until 3/5/2015. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
DONNA L. CALVERT
Regional Chief Counsel
Social Security Administration
THEOPHOUS H. REAGANS, CSBN 189450
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Social Security Administration
Office of the General Counsel
160 Spear St. Ste. 800
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: (415) 977-8938
Facsimile: (415) 744-0134
Email: theophous.reagans@ssa.gov
Attorneys for Defendant
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
TAWANNA THOMAS,
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
) No. 2:14-CV-01099-AC
)
) STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
22
23
24
25
26
27
The parties, through their respective counsel, stipulate that the time for Defendant to
respond to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from February 3, 2015 until
March 5, 2015. Because of illness, causing absence from the office, and press of other work,
Defendant’s counsel needs additional time to review this case and to respond to Plaintiff Motion.
This is Defendant’s second request for an extension. However, Defendant’s counsel makes this
28
-1-
1
request in good faith and apologizes to the Court for the delay. All other dates in the Court’s
2
Scheduling Order are extended accordingly.
3
4
Date: February 3, 2015
/s/ Peter Brixie
(Authorized via email)
PETER BRIXIE
Attorney for Plaintiff
Dated: February 3, 2015
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
5
6
7
8
9
/s/ Theophous H. Reagans
THEOPHOUS H. REAGANS
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
10
11
12
Attorneys for Defendant
13
14
IT IS SO ORDERED:
15
16
Dated: February 4, 2015
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?