Padilla v. Beard et al

Filing 122

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/22/2016 ORDERING [ 114 ] As of this time, both plaintiff and his counsel are directed to appear at the 5/2/2016 settlement conference in person. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JERMAINE PADILLA, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:14-cv-1118-KJM-CKD ORDER v. JEFFREY BEARD, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 On April 22, 2016, an informal telephonic conference was held in this matter before the 17 18 undersigned to address plaintiff’s request to discuss potential alternative arrangements to having 19 plaintiff and his counsel appear at the May 2, 2016 settlement conference in person. Attorney 20 Lori Rifkin appeared telephonically on behalf of plaintiff. Attorney Diana Esquivel appeared 21 telephonically on behalf of defendants. As of this time, both plaintiff and his counsel are directed to appear at the May 2, 2016 22 23 settlement conference in person. Nevertheless, as discussed during the telephonic conference, the 24 undersigned is willing to reconsider this order with respect to plaintiff’s personal appearance but 25 only upon a showing by plaintiff that it is the professional opinion of his mental healthcare 26 physicians that his travel to and in-person attendance at the settlement conference will very likely 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 cause him to suffer significant mental stress1 that could only be avoided by his attendance via 2 remote means.2 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 22, 2016 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 1 25 Significant mental stress means that plaintiff will suffer a near-catastrophic impediment to the stabilization of his mental health. 26 2 27 28 While no hard deadline is imposed for such a showing, the undersigned cautions plaintiff’s counsel that she should be prepared to have both plaintiff and herself attend the settlement conference in person and should file a request for plaintiff’s attendance via videoconference making the requisite showing as soon as is reasonably possible. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?