Padilla v. Beard et al

Filing 65

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/4/15: The hearing date of November 25, 2015 on plaintiff's motion to compel is vacated. The parties shall submit no later than November 10, 2015, a joint letter brief, limited to five pages, regarding the issues raised in the motion to compel. The matter shall thereafter stand submitted. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JERMAINE PADILLA, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:14-cv-1118 KJM CKD v. ORDER JEFFREY BEARD, 15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff has noticed a motion to compel regarding the deposition of defendant Beard and 17 18 production of a document defendant previously agreed to produce. By order filed October 19, 19 2015, defendant was ordered to submit to a deposition no later than October 20, 2015, absent 20 stipulation of the parties. The court regards defendant’s refusal to submit to a deposition at the 21 time agreed to by the parties as a possible contempt of court. Because the date for disclosure of 22 expert witnesses is imminent and the discovery sought here may be relevant to the experts’ 23 analysis, the court will set an expedited briefing for this matter and submit it on the papers. 24 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 25 1. The hearing date of November 25, 2015 on plaintiff’s motion to compel is vacated. 26 ///// 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 1 2. The parties shall submit no later than November 10, 2015, a joint letter brief, limited to 2 five pages, regarding the issues raised in the motion to compel. The matter shall thereafter stand 3 submitted. 4 Dated: November 4, 2015 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 6 7 8 4 padilla1118.fts 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?