Gambrell v. SSA

Filing 18

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/4/14. Plaintiff's opening brief due by 11/12/14. (Manzer, C)

Download PDF
JACQUELINE A. FORSLUND CSBN 154575 Attorney at Law P.O. Box 4476 Sunriver, OR 97707 Telephone: Email: 541-419-0074 jaf@forslundlaw.com Attorney for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BERNARD GAMBRELL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) v. ) ) CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant, ) ) ____________________________________) Case No. 2:14-cv-01123-CKD STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPENING BRIEF IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, to extend the time to November 12, 2014, for Plaintiff to file his Opening Brief, in accordance with the Court’s Scheduling Order. This is Plaintiff’s second and last request for an extension. The extension is requested because Plaintiff’s counsel recently experienced health problems that caused a backlog in her workload. Gambrell v. Colvin E.D. Cal. 2:14-cv-01123-CKD Stipulation and Proposed Order The parties further stipulate that the Court’s Scheduling Order be modified accordingly. Respectfully submitted, Date: October 31, 2014 JACQUELINE A. FORSLUND Attorney at Law /s/Jacqueline A. Forslund JACQUELINE A. FORSLUND Attorney for Plaintiff Date: October 31, 2014 BENJAMIN J. WAGNER United States Attorney DONNA L. CALVERT Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration /s/*Theophous H. Reagans THEOPHOUS H. REAGANS Special Assistant United States Attorney *By email authorization Attorney for Defendant ORDER APPROVED AND SO ORDERED Dated: November 4, 2014 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Gambrell v. Colvin E.D. Cal. 2:14-cv-01123-CKD Stipulation and Proposed Order

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?