Gambrell v. SSA
Filing
27
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 2/9/15. Plaintiff's reply to Motion for Summary Judgment is due by 3/4/15. (Manzer, C)
JACQUELINE A. FORSLUND
Attorney at Law
CSBN 154575
P.O. Box 4476
Sunriver, OR 97707
Telephone:
Email:
541-419-0074
jaf@forslundlaw.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
BERNARD GAMBRELL,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
)
v.
)
)
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
)
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
)
)
Defendant,
)
)
____________________________________)
Case No. 2:14-cv-01123-CKD
AMENDED STIPULATION
AND PROPOSED ORDER
FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
TO FILE REPLY
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, to
extend the time 30 days to March 4, 2015, for Plaintiff to file his Reply, in accordance with the
Court’s Scheduling Order. This is Plaintiff’s first request for an extension to file his Reply. The
extension is requested because Plaintiff’s counsel recently experienced prolonged health
problems that caused a backlog in her workload, which counsel is in the process of resolving.
Gambrell v. Colvin
E.D. Cal. 2:14-cv-01123-CKD
Stipulation and Proposed Order
The parties further stipulate that the Court’s Scheduling Order be modified accordingly.
Respectfully submitted,
Date: January 30, 2015
JACQUELINE A. FORSLUND
Attorney at Law
/s/Jacqueline A. Forslund
JACQUELINE A. FORSLUND
Attorney for Plaintiff
Date: January 30, 2015
BENJAMIN J. WAGNER
United States Attorney
DONNA L. CALVERT
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
/s/*Theophous J. Reagans
THEOPHOUS H. REAGANS
Special Assistant United States Attorney
*By email authorization
Attorney for Defendant
ORDER
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED
Dated: February 9, 2015
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Gambrell v. Colvin
E.D. Cal. 2:14-cv-01123-CKD
Stipulation and Proposed Order
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?