Gambrell v. SSA

Filing 27

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 2/9/15. Plaintiff's reply to Motion for Summary Judgment is due by 3/4/15. (Manzer, C)

Download PDF
JACQUELINE A. FORSLUND Attorney at Law CSBN 154575 P.O. Box 4476 Sunriver, OR 97707 Telephone: Email: 541-419-0074 Attorney for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BERNARD GAMBRELL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) v. ) ) CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ) Acting Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant, ) ) ____________________________________) Case No. 2:14-cv-01123-CKD AMENDED STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their undersigned attorneys, to extend the time 30 days to March 4, 2015, for Plaintiff to file his Reply, in accordance with the Court’s Scheduling Order. This is Plaintiff’s first request for an extension to file his Reply. The extension is requested because Plaintiff’s counsel recently experienced prolonged health problems that caused a backlog in her workload, which counsel is in the process of resolving. Gambrell v. Colvin E.D. Cal. 2:14-cv-01123-CKD Stipulation and Proposed Order The parties further stipulate that the Court’s Scheduling Order be modified accordingly. Respectfully submitted, Date: January 30, 2015 JACQUELINE A. FORSLUND Attorney at Law /s/Jacqueline A. Forslund JACQUELINE A. FORSLUND Attorney for Plaintiff Date: January 30, 2015 BENJAMIN J. WAGNER United States Attorney DONNA L. CALVERT Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration /s/*Theophous J. Reagans THEOPHOUS H. REAGANS Special Assistant United States Attorney *By email authorization Attorney for Defendant ORDER APPROVED AND SO ORDERED Dated: February 9, 2015 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Gambrell v. Colvin E.D. Cal. 2:14-cv-01123-CKD Stipulation and Proposed Order

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?