Ostapenko v. Meyer et al

Filing 11

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/1/2014 ORDERING that within 14 days petitioner shall SHOW CAUSE, in writing, why this court should not grant the pending motion to dismiss. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

VIKTOR NIKOLAYEVICH
OSTAPENKO,
Petitioner,

13

ORDER
v.

14
15

No. 2:14-cv-1176 DAD P

CRAIG MEYER et al.,
Respondent.

16
17

Petitioner has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241,

18

alleging that respondent and the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement are unlawfully

19

detaining him at the Yuba County Jail. On June 19, 2014, the undersigned ordered respondent to

20

file a response to the petition. Thereafter, counsel for respondent filed a motion to dismiss the

21

petition as having been rendered moot. According to respondent’s motion, petitioner was

22

released from detention on August 9, 2014. (Resp’t’s Mot. to Dismiss at 1 & Ex.) Petitioner has

23

not opposed or otherwise responded to respondent’s pending motion to dismiss.
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within fourteen days of the date

24
25

of this order petitioner shall show cause in writing why this court should not grant the pending

26

/////

27

/////

28

/////
1

1

motion to dismiss the habeas petition filed in this court as having been rendered moot by his

2

release.

3

Dated: October 1, 2014

4
5
6

DAD:9
osta1176.102

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2