Alvarez v. State of California et al
Filing
15
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/10/2015 DENYING plaintiff's 12 Rule 60(b) motion ; and GRANTING plaintiff's 13 , 14 request for an extension of time and/or stay, to the extent that plaintiff shall have an additional 60 days to file his amended complaint. Absent good cause, the court is not inclined to grant additional requests for extensions of time. Plaintiff is admonished that failure to timely file his amended complaint may result in dismissal of this action. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
GUSTAVO ALVAREZ,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:14-cv-1181-KJM-EFB P
v.
ORDER
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42
17
18
U.S.C. § 1983. He requests an extension of time and/or a stay to file his amended complaint and
19
further requests relief from judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil
20
Procedure.
21
Rule 60(b) authorizes a court, “[o]n motion and just terms,” to “relieve a party or its legal
22
representative from a final judgment, order, or proceeding” on any of the grounds enumerated in
23
the rule. Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b); see also United States v. Martin, 226 F.3d 1042, 1048 & n.8 (9th
24
Cir. 2000) (Rule 60(b) “applies only to motions attacking final, appealable orders”). The court
25
has not yet issued a final and appealable order in this case. Rather, it has merely dismissed the
26
original complaint with leave to amend. Relief from the May 7, 2015 order dismissing the
27
complaint with leave to amend is not available under Rule 60(b).
28
/////
1
1
2
The court will, however, grant plaintiff an extension of time to file his amended complaint
pursuant to the court’s May 7, 2015 order.
3
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
4
1. Plaintiff’s Rule 60(b) motion (ECF No. 12) is denied; and
5
2. Plaintiff’s request for an extension of time and/or a stay (ECF Nos. 13, 14) is granted
6
to the extent that plaintiff shall have an additional sixty (60) days in which to file his amended
7
complaint. Absent good cause, the court is not inclined to grant additional requests for extensions
8
of time. Plaintiff is admonished that failure to timely file his amended complaint may result in
9
dismissal of this action.
10
DATED: June 10, 2015.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?