Williams v. Harris

Filing 15

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 12/17/14: The findings and recommendations filed October 2, 2014, are adopted in full. Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis is denied as barred by the three strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. §1915(g). Plaintiff's complaint is summarily dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. (Kaminski, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

LONNIE WILLIAMS,

12
13
14

No. 2:14-cv-1191 WBS AC P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

KAMALA D. HARRIS,

15

Defendant.

16
17

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief

18

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

19

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

20

On October 2, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

21

which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the

22

findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 12. Plaintiff

23

was granted a thirty-day extension of time to file objections to the findings and recommendations,

24

ECF No. 14, but has failed to do so.

25

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

26

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

27

ORDERED that:

28

1. The findings and recommendations filed October2, 2014, are adopted in full;
1

1

2.

2
3

provision of 28 U.S.C. §1915(g); and
3. Plaintiff’s complaint is summarily dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim

4
5

Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis is denied as barred by the three strikes

upon which relief can be granted.
Dated: December 17, 2014

6
7
8
9
10

/will1191.800

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2