Pimentel v. Beard et al
Filing
13
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/4/15: Plaintiff has thirty days from the date of this order in which to show cause why his case should not be dismissed. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RICARDO PIMENTEL,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:14-cv-1192 DAD
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
JEFFREY BEARD, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner who filed an action for alleged civil rights violations under 42
18
U.S.C. § 1983. By an order filed December 31, 2014, plaintiff was required to complete and
19
return to the court, within thirty days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on the
20
defendant, Brett Matthew Fleming. (See ECF No. 10.) That thirty-day period has long since
21
passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any way to the court’s order.
22
Local Rule 110 states that “[f]ailure of ... a party to comply with these Rules or with any
23
order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions authorized
24
by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court.” Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
25
41(b) authorizes dismissal of a case for a party’s failure to prosecute his claims or for failure to
26
comply with a court order. In this case, plaintiff’s failure to comply with the court’s order of
27
December 31, 2014, suggests that plaintiff does not intend to prosecute his claims further. The
28
court will grant plaintiff thirty days from the date of this order in which to show cause why his
1
1
case should not be dismissed. Failure to respond to this order will result in a recommendation
2
that this action be dismissed.
3
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff has thirty days from the date of
4
this order in which to show cause why his case should not be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule
5
Civil Procedure 41(b) and Local Rule 110.
6
Dated: August 4, 2015
7
8
9
hm
pime1192.osc
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?