Pimentel v. Beard et al
Filing
42
ORDER adopting 38 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full, signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 3/13/17. Plaintiff's 33 Motion for Temporary Emergency Injunction is DENIED.(Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RICARDO PIMENTEL,
12
13
14
No. 2:14-cv-1192 MCE DB P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
JEFFREY BEARD, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On November 30, 2016, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
21
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
22
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations.
24
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
26
ORDERED that:
27
28
1. The findings and recommendations filed November 30, 2016 (ECF No. 38), are
ADOPTED IN FULL;
1
1
2
3
4
2. Plaintiff’s March 7, 2016 Motion for Temporary Emergency Injunction (ECF No. 33)
is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 13, 2017
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
DLB:9
Pime1192.inj.801
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?