Pimentel v. Beard et al
Filing
62
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 2/15/18 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 1/11/18 61 are ADOPTED IN FULL; and Plaintiff's Motion for a Stay 60 is DENIED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RICARDO PIMENTEL,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:14-cv-1192 MCE DB P
v.
ORDER
JEFFREY BEARD, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On January 11, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
20
21
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
22
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 61. Neither
23
party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
24
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
26
ORDERED that:
27
///
28
///
1
1
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed January 11, 2018 (ECF No. 61) are
ADOPTED IN FULL; and
3
2. Plaintiff’s motion for a stay (ECF No. 60) is DENIED.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.\
5
Dated: February 15, 2018
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?