Galea, et al. v. 7-Eleven, Inc.
Filing
38
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/12/16 ORDERING that plaintiffs' and defendant's counsel are hereby ORDERED to show cause on or before 10/21/2016, explaining why this case should not be dismissed, or explaining with particularity when the parties anticipate filing dispositional documents. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
JOE GALEA, a resident of the State of
California, JIVTESH GILL, a resident of
the State of California, PARAMJYOT
GILL, a resident of the State of California,
JATINDER SINGH, a resident of the State
of California; VEENA SINGH, a resident
of the State of Nevada; ST. GEORGE
STORES, INC., a Washington corporation;
JAS DHILLON, a resident of the State of
California; HARPARKASH DHILLON, a
resident of the State of California, and
RUBY ENTERPRISES INC., a
Washington corporation,
21
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Plaintiffs,
19
20
No. 2:14-CV-01200-KJM-CKD
v.
7-ELEVEN, INC., a corporation organized
under the laws of the State of Texas,
22
Defendant.
23
24
25
26
27
28
On March 31, 2016, the parties to this action filed an amended notice of
settlement. ECF No. 34. On April 5, 2016, the court took notice of the parties’ settlement, and
ordered the parties to file dispositional documents no later than September 30, 2016. ECF No.
36. On July 17, 2016, the parties filed a joint status report, which states the parties need to collect
1
signatures to finalize the settlement agreement before filing dispositional documents, and states
2
the parties hope to "reach the 90% threshold" within the next few months." ECF No. 37. Nearly
3
three months has lapsed since the parties filed their joint status report, and the court has received
4
no request for an extension of time to file dospositional documents. The September 30, 2016
5
deadline for filing dispositional documents has passed.
6
Accordingly, plaintiffs’ and defendant’s counsel are hereby ordered to show cause on or
7
before October 21, 2016, explaining why this case should not be dismissed, or explaining with
8
particularity when the parties anticipate filing dispositional documents.
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: October 12, 2016
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?