Canada v. De Fazio

Filing 6

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 07/31/14 ordering the clerk of court is directed to: a) redesignate the undersigned findings and recommendations filed 07/01/14 4 as an order; and b) withdraw the assignment of a district judge to this action; and for the reasons stated in this court's order filed 07/01/14, this action is dismissed without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RONALD CANADA, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:14-cv-1208 CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER DE FAZIO, Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 1, 2014, the undersigned recommended that this action be 19 dismissed without prejudice due to plaintiff’s failure to file a complaint. (ECF No. 4.) Court 20 records reveal that plaintiff has filed a notice of consent to proceed pursuant to the jurisdiction of 21 the undersigned magistrate judge for all purposes. 28 U.S.C. § 636(c); Local Rule 302. (ECF 22 No. 5.) Plaintiff has filed no objections to the findings and recommendations, and there is no 23 basis for modifying the undersigned’s prior conclusion that this action should be dismissed. 24 Moreover, as no defendants have been served to date, plaintiff is the only party to this action. 25 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 26 1. The Clerk of Court is directed to: (a) redesignate the undersigned’s findings and 27 recommendations filed July 1, 2014 (ECF No. 4) as an order; and (b) withdraw the assignment of 28 a district judge to this action; and 1 1 2. For the reasons stated in this court’s order filed July 1, 2014, this action is dismissed 2 without prejudice. 3 Dated: July 31, 2014 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 2 / cana1208.withdraw 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?