Hensley v. Johnston et al
Filing
18
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 4/6/2015 GRANTING 17 plaintiff's Request to continue the Scheduling Conference from 4/13/2015 to 6/22/2015 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. A Joint Status Report shall be filed no later than 6/8/2015. (Kirksey Smith, K)
1
2
3
4
DANIEL MALAKAUSKAS, SBN 265903
P.O. Box 7006
Stockton, CA 95267
Telephone: (866)790-2242
Facsimile: (888)802-2440
Attorney for Plaintiff:
ROSELYN HENSLEY
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
10
11
12
CASE NO.: 2:14-cv-01220-WBS-AC
ROSELYN HENSLEY,
13
14
PLAINTIFF,
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
CONTINUANCE OF THE PRETRIAL
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
THEREOF
15
16
v.
17
19
CYNTHIA JOHNSTON, KENNETH
JOHNSTON, HONDA OF SACRAMENTO,
and DOES 1-10, inclusive,
20
DEFENDANTS.
18
21
LET THIS HONORABLE COURT TAKE NOTICE:
22
23
24
Plaintiff hereby submits, and requests, through this motion for a continuance of the
25
pretrial scheduling conference, that the court, through its tolerance, continue the pretrial
26
scheduling conference, scheduled on April 13th, 2015, to June 22nd, 2015 in which to give
27
plaintiff the necessary time to finish serving defendants with process.
28
MOTION FOR A CONTINUANCE OF THE PRETRIAL SCHEDULING
CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING THEREOF
1
1
Date: April 5th, 2015
Respectfully Submitted,
2
3
/s/Daniel Malakauskas
By: Daniel Malakauskas
Attorney for Plaintiff,
ROSELYN HENSLEY
4
5
6
7
ORDER
8
9
10
11
12
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the pretrial scheduling conference is continued from
April 13th, 2015 until June 22nd, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. A Joint Status Report shall be filed no later
than June 8, 2015.
Dated: April 6, 2015
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MOTION FOR A CONTINUANCE OF THE PRETRIAL SCHEDULING
CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING THEREOF
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?