Hensley v. Johnston et al

Filing 18

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 4/6/2015 GRANTING 17 plaintiff's Request to continue the Scheduling Conference from 4/13/2015 to 6/22/2015 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. A Joint Status Report shall be filed no later than 6/8/2015. (Kirksey Smith, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 DANIEL MALAKAUSKAS, SBN 265903 P.O. Box 7006 Stockton, CA 95267 Telephone: (866)790-2242 Facsimile: (888)802-2440 Attorney for Plaintiff: ROSELYN HENSLEY 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 10 11 12 CASE NO.: 2:14-cv-01220-WBS-AC ROSELYN HENSLEY, 13 14 PLAINTIFF, PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF THE PRETRIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING THEREOF 15 16 v. 17 19 CYNTHIA JOHNSTON, KENNETH JOHNSTON, HONDA OF SACRAMENTO, and DOES 1-10, inclusive, 20 DEFENDANTS. 18 21 LET THIS HONORABLE COURT TAKE NOTICE: 22 23 24 Plaintiff hereby submits, and requests, through this motion for a continuance of the 25 pretrial scheduling conference, that the court, through its tolerance, continue the pretrial 26 scheduling conference, scheduled on April 13th, 2015, to June 22nd, 2015 in which to give 27 plaintiff the necessary time to finish serving defendants with process. 28 MOTION FOR A CONTINUANCE OF THE PRETRIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING THEREOF 1 1 Date: April 5th, 2015 Respectfully Submitted, 2 3 /s/Daniel Malakauskas By: Daniel Malakauskas Attorney for Plaintiff, ROSELYN HENSLEY 4 5 6 7 ORDER 8 9 10 11 12 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the pretrial scheduling conference is continued from April 13th, 2015 until June 22nd, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. A Joint Status Report shall be filed no later than June 8, 2015. Dated: April 6, 2015 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MOTION FOR A CONTINUANCE OF THE PRETRIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING THEREOF 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?