A. v. Folsom Cordova Unified School District

Filing 19

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/8/15: Defendant's request for an extension of time 18 is granted. A copy of the administrative record shall be lodged with the court, and served upon the plaintiffs, on or before January 30, 2015. On or before February 6, 2015, each party may, but is not required to, file a proposed amended schedule with respect to further proceedings in this action. (Kaminski, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

KARIM ABDELLA and PATRICIA
ABDELLA,
Plaintiffs,

13

ORDER
v.

14
15

No. 2:14-cv-1259 KJM DAD PS

FOLSOM CORDOVA UNIFIED
SCHOOL DISTRICT,

16

Defendant.

17
Plaintiffs Karim Abdella and Patricia Abdella are proceeding pro se in the above entitled

18
19

action. The action has therefore been referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule

20

302(c)(21) for all purposes encompassed by that rule.

21

On December 19, 2014, defendant filed a letter requesting a further extension of the

22

December 19, 2014 deadline for the lodging of the administrative record in this action. (Dkt. No.

23

18.) Therein, defendant explains that the “parties are still in the process of working through

24

issues,” some of which “are complex,” and that the defendant is attempting to locate some

25

evidence that may be missing from the administrative record. (Id. at 1.) Defendant explains that

26

their request was submitted by letter instead of by way of a stipulation and proposed order

27

/////

28

/////
1

1

because the defendant was “unable to get a stipulation executed prior to the lodging deadline.”1

2

(Id.) Defendant requests the deadline be extended to January 30, 2015.

3

Good cause appearing, the request for a further extension of time will be granted. No

4

further extensions of time for this purpose will be granted absent a substantial showing of good

5

cause. Moreover, as a result of the further extension of time, the schedule set forth in the court’s

6

October 15, 2014 order will likely have to be amended.

7

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

8

1. Defendant’s December 19, 2014 request for an extension of time (Dkt. No. 18) is

9

granted;

10
11

2. A copy of the administrative record shall be lodged with the court, and served upon the
plaintiffs, on or before January 30, 2015;

12

3. On or before February 6, 2015, each party may, but is not required to, file a proposed

13

amended schedule with respect to further proceedings in this action.

14

Dated: January 8, 2015

15
16
17
18

DAD:6
Ddad1\orders.pro se\abdella1259.eot.ord.docx

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1

Defendant’s letter reflects that the pro se plaintiffs were informed of the contents of the letter
and that a copy of the letter was served on the plaintiffs. Neither plaintiff has filed an objection to
the defendant’s letter request for an extension of time. The court has construed the lack of
objection to be a reflection of plaintiffs’ non-opposition to the request.
2