Mrotz et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al

Filing 39

STIPULATED ORDER OF DISMISSAL signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 4/23/2015 DISMISSING the entire case with prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Michel, G.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT MROTZ, PATRICIA HAMAN

Case. No. 2:14-cv-01271-JAM-CKD

Plaintiffs,
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF
DISMISSAL
v.
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER
CORPORATION, dba AMTRAK; UNION
PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY and
DOES 1 to 100

Defendants.
________________________________________/
Jacob D. Flesher, Esq. CSB # 210565
Jeremy J. Schroeder, Esq.CSB # 223118
Flesher McKague, LLP
Attorneys for Defendants
2202 Plaza Drive
Rocklin, CA 95765
FAX [phone]
______________________________/

Gregory J. Brod CSB # 184456
BROD LAW FIRM, P.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
96 Jessie Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
FAX [phone]

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff, PATRICIA HAMAN, and
Defendants, NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION dba AMTRAK and
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, through their designated counsel, that the Court
dismiss the above-entitled matter, with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure rule
41(a)(1). Each party agrees to bear their own fees and costs.

DATED: April 7, 2015

BROD LAW FIRM, PC.

By __/s/_____________________________
GREGORY J. BROD, ESQ.
Attorneys for plaintiffs
ROBERT MROTZ,
PATRICIA HAMAN, and
ROGER HAMAN

DATED: April 23, 2015

FLESHER MCKAGUE LLP

By _/s/______________________________
JACOB D. FLESHER, ESQ.
JEREMY J. SCHROEDER, ESQ.
Attorneys for defendants,
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER
CORPORATION dba AMTRAK, and
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY

ORDER
Pursuant to the foregoing, this Court dismisses the entire case with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED:

Dated: 4/23/2015

/s/ John A. Mendez___________________
HON. JOHN A. MENDEZ
JUDGE OF THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT

2