California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Pick-N-Pull Auto Dismantlers et al
Filing
21
ORDER; CONSENT DECREE signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 11/25/14. (Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Layne Friedrich (Bar No. 195431)
Layne@lawyersforcleanwater.com
Drevet Hunt (Bar No. 240487)
Drev@lawyersforcleanwater.com
LAWYERS FOR CLEAN WATER, INC.
1004-A O’Reilly Avenue
San Francisco, California 94129
Telephone: (415) 440-6520
Facsimile: (415) 440-4155
Attorneys for Plaintiff
CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING
PROTECTION ALLIANCE
8
9
10
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
14
15
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION
ALLIANCE, a non-profit corporation,
16
17
Plaintiff,
Civil Case No.: 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD
[PROPOSED] CONSENT DECREE
v.
18
PICK-N-PULL AUTO DISMANTLERS, et al.
19
20
Defendants.
(Federal Water Pollution Control Act,
33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq.)
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[Proposed] Consent Decree
Civil Case No. 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD
1
CONSENT DECREE
2
The following Consent Decree is entered into by and between Plaintiff California Sportfishing
3
Protection Alliance (“Plaintiff” or “CSPA”), and Defendants Pick-N-Pull Auto Dismantlers, a California
4
general partnership, Pick and Pull Auto Dismantling, Inc., and Norprop, Inc. (collectively “Defendants”
5
or “PNP”). The entities entering into this Consent Decree are each an individual “Settling Party” and
6
collectively “Settling Parties.”
7
WHEREAS, CSPA is a non-profit public benefit corporation dedicated to the preservation,
8
protection, and restoration of the environment, the wildlife and the natural resources of all waters of
9
California, including the Sacramento River, the American River, and the Sacramento-San Joaquin River
10
Delta;
11
WHEREAS, Plaintiff alleges that Pick and Pull Auto Dismantling, Inc., Schnitzer Steel
12
Industries, Inc., Auto Parts Group, Norprop Inc., and Pick-N-Pull Auto Dismantlers are each an owner
13
and/or operator of the automobile dismantling and used auto parts facility located at 6355 Pacific Street
14
Rocklin, California, 95677 (hereinafter the “Facility”). As long as Defendants implement the BMPs
15
identified in Paragraph 14 hereof, and no industrial activity occurs in the Customer Parking Lot, the
16
Customer Parking Lot shall not be considered part of the Facility;
17
WHEREAS, Defendants aver that Pick-N-Pull Auto Dismantlers is the owner and operator of
18
the Facility, and is responsible for compliance with the requirements of the Federal Water Pollution
19
Control Act, 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251, et seq. (“Clean Water Act” or “CWA”) at the Facility;
20
21
22
23
WHEREAS, the general partners of Pick-N-Pull Auto Dismantlers are Pick and Pull Auto
Dismantling, Inc. and Norprop, Inc.;
WHEREAS, Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc. is the parent corporation of Pick and Pull Auto
Dismantling, Inc., Norprop Inc., and Pick-N-Pull Auto Dismantlers;
24
WHEREAS, Defendants’ operations involve the de-pollution and recycling of end-of-life
25
vehicles, thus contributing to protection of the environment and conservation of natural resources;
26
27
WHEREAS, storm water at the Facility discharges from one outfall into the municipal separate
storm sewer system operated by the City of Rocklin (“MS4”);
28
[Proposed] Consent Decree
1
Civil Case No. 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD
1
WHEREAS, Plaintiff contends that operations at the Facility result in discharges of pollutants
2
into Facility storm drains, and that those storm drains discharge to surface waters, including Antelope
3
Creek, which are tributaries to the Sacramento River;
4
WHEREAS, discharges from the Facility are currently regulated by the National Pollutant
5
Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”) General Permit No. CAS000001 [State Water Resources
6
Control Board] Water Quality Order No. 92-12-DWQ, as amended by Order No. 97-03-DWQ (“Storm
7
Water Permit”) and the Clean Water Act;
8
WHEREAS, as of July 1, 2015, storm water discharges from the Facility will be regulated by
9
NPDES General Permit No. CAS000001 [State Water Resources Control Board] Water Quality Order
10
11
12
13
No. 2014-0057-DWQ (“New Storm Water Permit”);
WHEREAS, Defendants are participants in the California Auto Dismantlers Group (“CADG”)
Monitoring Program under the Storm Water Permit;
WHEREAS, on March 21, 2014, Plaintiff sent Pick-N-Pull Auto Dismantlers, Pick and Pull
14
Auto Dismantling, Inc., Norprop, Inc. and Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc. a notice of intent to file suit
15
(“Notice Letter”) under Sections 505(a) and (b) of the CWA, 33 U.S.C. §§ 1365(a) and (b). The Notice
16
Letter alleged violations of Sections 301(a) and 402 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §§ 1311(a) and
17
1342, and violations of the Storm Water Permit. A copy of the Notice Letter was sent to the United
18
States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) Region IX, the State Water Resources Control Board
19
(“State Board”) and the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (“Regional Board”);
20
WHEREAS, on May 23, 2014, PNP submitted a detailed response to the Notice Letter to
21
Plaintiff, setting forth defenses to many of the alleged violations and describing the steps it had
22
undertaken to correct other alleged violations. Among other things, PNP’s response described the
23
structural and non-structural Best Management Practices (“BMPs”) employed by the Facility as part of
24
its Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (“SWPPP”) to reduce or prevent pollutants in storm water
25
discharges;
26
WHEREAS, storm water discharged by the Facility flows through Jensen storm water
27
interceptors, oil-water separators, and then is treated by a StormwateRx Clara 40C (a 5,000 gallon
28
capacity four-stage clarifier) and by a StormwateRx Aquip 110SBI treatment system prior to discharge
[Proposed] Consent Decree
2
Civil Case No. 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD
1
to the MS4;
2
3
WHEREAS, Defendants allege that the StormwateRx Clara 40C was installed at the Facility in
March 2011 and the StormwateRx Aquip 110SBI was installed in August 2013;
4
5
WHEREAS, Defendants provided Plaintiff with a copy of the current SWPPP for the Facility
on May 23, 2014;
6
WHEREAS, on May 27, 2014, Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defendants, in the United
7
States District Court, Eastern District of California (Case No. 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD) alleging
8
ongoing violations of the CWA (hereinafter “Complaint”);
9
WHEREAS, Pick-N-Pull Auto Dismantlers, Pick and Pull Auto Dismantling, Inc., Norprop,
10
Inc., and Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc., deny all allegations in the Notice Letter and Complaint, and
11
maintain that their operations are in compliance with the requirements of the CWA and the Storm Water
12
Permit;
13
WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendants have agreed that it is in the Settling Parties’ mutual
14
interest to enter into a Consent Decree setting forth terms and conditions appropriate to resolving the
15
allegations set forth in the Complaint without further proceedings and without any admission of liability
16
on the part of the Defendants; and
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WHEREAS, all actions taken by Defendants pursuant to this Consent Decree shall be made in
compliance with all applicable Federal and State laws and local rules and regulations.
NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BETWEEN THE SETTLING
PARTIES AND ORDERED AND DECREED BY THE COURT AS FOLLOWS:
1.
The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to Section
505(a)(1)(A) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1365(a)(1)(A).
2.
Venue is appropriate in the Eastern District pursuant to Section 505(c)(1) of the Clean
Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1365(c)(1), because the Facility at which the alleged violations took place is
located within this District.
3.
The Complaint states claims upon which, if true, relief may be granted pursuant to
Section 505 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1365.
4.
Plaintiff has standing to bring this action.
[Proposed] Consent Decree
3
Civil Case No. 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD
1
5.
The Court shall retain jurisdiction over this matter for purposes of enforcing the terms of
2
this Consent Decree for the life of the Consent Decree, or as long thereafter as is necessary for the Court
3
to resolve any pending motion to enforce this Consent Decree.
4
I.
AGENCY REVIEW AND TERM OF CONSENT DECREE
5
6.
Plaintiff shall submit this Consent Decree to the United States Department of Justice
6
(“DOJ”) and the EPA (collectively “Federal Agencies”) within four (4) days of the final signature of the
7
Settling Parties for agency review consistent with 40 C.F.R. § 135.5. In the event that the Federal
8
Agencies object to entry of this Consent Decree, the Settling Parties agree to meet and confer to attempt
9
to resolve the issue(s) raised by the Federal Agencies within a reasonable amount of time.
10
7.
The term “Effective Date” as used in this Consent Decree shall mean the last day for the
11
Federal Agencies to comment on the Consent Decree, i.e., the forty-fifth (45th) day following the
12
Federal Agencies’ receipt of the Consent Decree, or the date on which the Federal Agencies provide
13
notice that they require no further review, whichever occurs earlier.
14
8.
This Consent Decree will terminate two (2) years from the Effective Date, unless there is
15
an ongoing, unresolved dispute regarding Defendants’ compliance with this Consent Decree in which
16
case the Consent Decree will terminate upon final resolution of the dispute.
17
II.
18
COMMITMENTS OF THE SETTLING PARTIES
A.
19
Storm Water Pollution Control Best Management Practices.
9.
In addition to maintaining the current structural and non-structural BMPs described in the
20
Facility’s SWPPP,1 as noted below, Defendants shall develop and implement the additional BMPs
21
identified herein, as well as any other BMPs necessary to comply with the provisions of this Consent
22
Decree and the Storm Water Permit, including but not limited to developing and implementing BMPs
23
that, collectively, are the Best Available Technology Economically Achievable (“BAT”) and the Best
24
Conventional Treatment Technology (“BCT”), as well as those necessary to comply with the Storm
25
Water Permit’s Receiving Water Limitations.
26
27
28
10.
Facility-Wide BMPs.
1
The current Facility SWPPP is attached hereto as Exhibit A, and contains the Facility map, which identifies the specific
areas of the Facility referenced in this Consent Decree.
[Proposed] Consent Decree
4
Civil Case No. 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD
1
a.
Evacuation of Automobile Fluid(s). Except as set forth in subparagraph 11.a.
2
below, Defendants agree that they will continue to drain all automobile fluid(s) in the covered vehicle
3
Drain Building (identified on the Facility map).
4
b.
Use of Tarping or Other Temporary Covering. Defendants shall continue to
5
inspect tarps and other temporary coverings that are used at the Facility to cover storage bins and other
6
containers used for automobile parts storage to ensure that the tarps and coverings are in place, intact, in
7
good condition and preventing the exposure of pollutant sources to precipitation. The inspections shall
8
take place as part of daily housekeeping activities and before rain events. All tarps or other covers shall
9
be repaired or replaced as necessary to prevent exposure of pollutant sources to precipitation.
10
c.
Vehicle Part(s) Storage. Defendants shall continue to inspect the Customer Yard
11
for loose vehicle parts as part of its daily housekeeping activities. Loose vehicle part(s) that are
12
discovered as part of daily housekeeping activities shall be placed inside vehicles, beneath vehicles, or
13
in covered container(s), to prevent the exposure of pollutants to precipitation. Prior to and during rain
14
events, Defendants shall focus their efforts on collection of loose parts that have the greatest potential to
15
contribute pollutants to storm water, but shall not be in breach of this Consent Decree solely based on
16
the discovery of loose vehicle parts in the Customer Yard as long as this provision is being complied
17
with.
18
19
11.
The Hold Area/De-Garbage Area.
a.
Consistent with its current operating procedures, Defendants shall not remove any
20
automotive fluid(s) from vehicles while they are located in the Hold Area/De-Garbage Area except
21
windshield wiper fluid, refrigerants, power steering fluid and brake fluid, all of which must be evacuated
22
by hand pump. Before draining of fluid(s) in the Hold Area/De-Garbage Area occurs, Defendants will
23
continue to ensure that BMP(s) are being implemented to (1) prevent spillage of fluids onto gravel, and
24
to (2) prevent releases of automotive fluids at the Hold Area/De-Garbage Area from flowing into drain
25
inlets. Once fluids are evacuated, they shall be emptied into appropriate containers stored under cover
26
within the designated storage areas of the Drain Building and Warehouse, consistent with current
27
operating procedures.
28
b.
Defendants shall continue to prohibit the placement of any vehicle in the
[Proposed] Consent Decree
5
Civil Case No. 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD
1
Customer Yard that has not been drained of fluid(s).
2
c.
Defendants shall continue to stage and maintain spill kits in the vicinity of the
3
Hold Area/De-Garbage Area so they are readily available to employees engaged in the evacuation of
4
fluids. The kits shall be labeled in both English and Spanish and shall contain absorbent pillows, oil
5
pads, oil booms and other absorbent materials. Defendants shall continue to train employees engaged in
6
the evacuation of fluids on the proper use of the kits.
7
d.
Consistent with existing operational procedures at the Facility, no automobile
8
dismantling or part(s) removal shall be conducted in the Hold Area/De-Garbage Area with the exception
9
of removal of batteries, wheel weights, mercury switches, and wheel rims. No storage of loose vehicle
10
part(s) shall occur in the Hold Area/De-Garbage Area. If rain is predicted, the engine compartment of
11
any vehicle(s) that does not have a hood will be covered at the end of the operating day to prevent
12
exposure of exposed vehicle part(s) to precipitation.
13
e.
In the event the requirements for an Action Plan are triggered during the term of
14
this Consent Decree (see Paragraph 19 below), Defendants shall consider the implementation of
15
additional BMPs for the Hold Area/De-Garbage Area, such as paving, cover, or other BMPs to prevent
16
the exposure of pollutant source(s) to precipitation. Defendants agree to include a discussion of these
17
BMPs in the Action Plan, and why they are or are not to be developed and implemented to address
18
pollutant level exceedances in discharges. Additional BMPs shall be implemented by the beginning of
19
the next upcoming Wet Season2 as set forth in Paragraph 20 below.
20
12.
21
Cleaning and Maintaining Impervious Surfaces.
a.
Cleaning: Defendants steam-cleaned the Crush Pad at the Facility in June 2014.
22
Prior to October 1, 2015 and October 1, 2016, Defendants shall steam-clean the Crush Pad and other
23
impervious surfaces at the Facility to remove the build-up of contaminants. In the event the requirements
24
for an Action Plan are triggered during the term of this Consent Decree (see Paragraph 19 below),
25
Defendants shall increase the frequency of steam-cleaning and/or propose additional BMPs to address
26
pollutant level exceedances in discharges. While steam-cleaning, Defendants shall block Outfall #1 in
27
order to prevent any non-storm water from discharging from the Facility.
28
2
Defined as October 1 – May 31.
[Proposed] Consent Decree
6
Civil Case No. 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD
1
b.
Patching: After steam-cleaning impervious surfaces, Defendants shall patch, at a
2
minimum, all cracks that are 1/4 inch or wider. In addition, as part of its regularly scheduled paving
3
maintenance activities, Defendants shall repair concrete and other paved surfaces at the Facility by
4
patching and/or replacing the surfaces.
5
c.
Sweeping: Within fifteen (15) days of the Effective Date, to the extent they have
6
not already done so, Defendants shall develop and implement a plan to sweep all impervious ground
7
surfaces at the Facility using a mechanical sweeper according to the following schedule: (1) at least once
8
a week during the Wet Season, (2) at least twenty-four (24) hours prior to any precipitation event where
9
more than 0.1 inches of rain is predicted in Rocklin with a minimum likelihood of occurrence of fifty-
10
percent (50%) by the National Weather Service, and (3) at least once per month during the Dry Season.3
11
Defendants shall keep a log of all sweeping done at the Facility.
12
13.
Cleaning and Maintaining Gravel and Pervious Surfaces. Defendants shall continue to
13
implement their good housekeeping program and inspect the Facility for stained and or contaminated
14
gravel, dirt, and build-up on other pervious surfaces. Defendants shall inspect the surfaces in the
15
Customer Yard, Hold Area and De-Garbage Area on a daily basis, and shall continue to ensure the entire
16
Facility is inspected at least weekly. Consistent with existing operational procedures at the Facility, all
17
significantly stained and/or contaminated gravel shall be replaced upon inspection, except that
18
significantly stained and/or contaminated gravel located underneath a vehicle shall be replaced after the
19
vehicle row has been cleared.
20
14.
21
Customer Access and Use of the Facility.
a.
On-site Automobile Repair. Consistent with existing operational procedures at the
22
Facility, Defendants shall continue to maintain signage in the Customer Parking Lot in English and
23
Spanish, and implement other BMPs as necessary, to prohibit customers and other individuals from
24
using any portion of the Customer Parking Lot for any automobile repair or dismantling activities.
25
Defendants shall continue to maintain such signs including ensuring that the signage is kept in good
26
condition.
27
28
b.
3
Within forty-five (45) days of the Effective Date, to the extent they have not
Defined as June 1 – September 30.
[Proposed] Consent Decree
7
Civil Case No. 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD
1
already done so, Defendants shall post signage in English and Spanish in the Customer Yard directing
2
customers to close hoods of vehicles after they have finished part(s) removal. Defendants shall maintain
3
such signs including ensuring that the signage is kept in good condition.
4
c.
Consistent with existing operational procedures at the Facility, to ensure that
5
customers are complying with the signage, and that the BMPs are effective, Defendants shall continue to
6
inspect the Customer Parking Lot at least once per day during operating hours and direct customers to
7
cease any unauthorized automobile repair or dismantling activities in the Customer Parking Lot when
8
such activity is observed.
9
d.
Defendants shall continue to place drip pans, rugs, mats and/or scrap carpeting
10
under each vehicle in the Customer Yard. Defendants shall continue to implement the Facility’s
11
procedures for the inspection, disposal, and replacement of all drip pans, rugs, mats and/or scrap
12
carpeting to ensure that once they are unable to absorb additional fluid and contaminants they are
13
properly disposed of and replaced.
14
e.
During the Wet Season, Defendants shall continue to require Facility employees
15
to close vehicle hoods as often as possible during operating hours. During the Dry Season, Defendants
16
shall require Facility employees to close vehicle hoods as part of regularly scheduled cleaning activities.
17
Defendants shall close vehicle hoods at least one (1) hour prior to the start of forecasted precipitation
18
with a likelihood of occurrence of sixty-percent (60%) and shall, to the extent feasible, focus their
19
efforts on maintaining vehicle hood closure during rain events.
20
15.
Crush Pad Area. Defendants shall continue to ensure that no vehicle will be crushed
21
unless the fluids have been evacuated and/or drained from it. This requirement shall not be interpreted to
22
require the removal, prior to crushing, of vehicle engines, transmissions or other parts that contained
23
fluids during the operating life of the vehicle, so long as the vehicles have been drained following
24
Defendants’ operational protocols and the terms of this Consent Decree. The Settling Parties
25
acknowledge that it is impossible to remove one-hundred-percent (100%) of all automotive fluids from a
26
vehicle and that small amounts of residual fluid may remain. Consistent with the Facility’s existing
27
BMPs, Defendants shall implement BMPs at the Crush Pad to ensure that any residual fluids released
28
during the crushing process are cleaned up and removed, preventing their flow into drain inlets. These
[Proposed] Consent Decree
8
Civil Case No. 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD
1
BMPs shall be implemented in addition to the Facility’s drain inlet protection BMPs.
2
16.
Hazardous Material and Secondary Containment. The current inventory, handling and
3
management procedures for hazardous materials and hazardous wastes shall be detailed in the SWPPP.
4
All such hazardous materials and hazardous wastes shall continue to be stored in designated “Hazardous
5
Waste Storage Areas.” Hazardous Waste Storage Areas shall be indoors and fully enclosed as stated in
6
the SWPPP. Hazardous Waste Storage Areas shall have secondary containment for containers with 55
7
gallons or more of capacity, as required by applicable regulations, including 40 C.F.R. § 112.1(d). If
8
outdoors, Hazardous Waste Storage Areas shall be protected from exposure to precipitation by roof
9
cover and/or tarping.
10
11
B.
Storm Water Drainage System.
17.
12
Discharge Locations and Storm Water Treatment.
a.
Defendants have re-routed the storm water system at the Facility so that all storm
13
water is directed through Jensen storm water interceptors and oil-water separators, which then flow to
14
the StormwateRx Clara 40C for initial treatment and then to the StormwateRx Aquip 110SBI for
15
additional treatment prior to discharge to Outfall #1, as identified on the attached Facility map (see
16
Exhibit A). Defendants have also implemented additional BMPs, such as containment berms and
17
grading, to ensure that storm water from the Facility is treated by the storm water systems described in
18
this paragraph.
19
b.
Consistent with existing operational procedures, Defendants shall continue to
20
utilize straw wattles, filters, and/or oil absorbents at each drain inlet at the Facility. Defendants shall
21
continue to implement the Facility procedures for the inspection and maintenance of all drain inlet
22
BMPs to ensure the drain inlet BMPs are in place, working as intended, and are being replaced as
23
needed, and according to manufacturer’s schedule. The BMP drain inlet inspections shall continue to
24
occur on a regular basis during routine weekly inspections, and during and after each rain event.
25
26
27
28
c.
Defendants shall continue to annually inspect the perimeter of the Facility, and
make any necessary repairs to ensure there are no storm water discharges from the Facility perimeter.
d.
Defendants shall continue to ensure the storm water drainage culvert, as identified
on the map attached hereto, remains free of debris including vehicle parts and/or storage of vehicles.
[Proposed] Consent Decree
9
Civil Case No. 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD
1
e.
Defendants shall continue to operate and maintain the existing Jensen storm water
2
interceptors, the oil-water separators, the StormwateRx Clara 40C and the StormwateRx Aquip 110SBI
3
throughout the term of this Consent Decree.
4
f.
Defendants shall continue to inspect the Facility’s storm water treatment systems
5
and related treatment BMPs on a weekly basis, after significant storm events and remove from them any
6
debris or other materials not related to the control and treatment of storm water (e.g., wood, metal,
7
concrete and other debris).
8
C.
9
Reduction of Pollutants in Discharges.
18.
Contaminant Reduction. Defendants shall develop and implement BMPs to reduce
10
pollutants in storm water discharges to levels below those in Table 1.4 However, the presence of any
11
contaminant in any discharge from the Facility in excess of the numeric values in Table 1 shall not be
12
considered a breach of this Consent Decree provided Defendants have implemented BMPs that achieve
13
BAT/BCT including, but not limited to, operation of the Jensen storm water interceptors, the oil-water
14
separators, the StormwateRx Clara 40C and the StormwateRx 110SBI, and other BMPs identified in the
15
Facility’s SWPPP and in this Consent Decree.
16
Table 1. Numeric Values for Facility Discharges
17
Contaminant
Value
Source of Value
18
Total Suspended Solids
Total Recoverable Copper
Total Recoverable Lead
Total Recoverable Zinc
Oil and Grease
Total Recoverable Aluminum
Total Cadmium
Total Recoverable Iron
Total Recoverable Mercury
Biochemical Oxygen Demand
pH
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
100 mg/L
0.0156 mg/L
0.095 mg/L
0.130 mg/
15 mg/L
0.750 mg/L
0.0023 mg/L
1.0 mg/L
0.0014 mg/L
30 mg/L
6.5-8.5 units
2008 EPA Benchmark
2008 EPA Benchmark
2008 EPA Benchmark
2008 EPA Benchmark
2008 EPA Benchmark
2008 EPA Benchmark
2008 EPA Benchmark
2008 EPA Benchmark
2008 EPA Benchmark
2008 EPA Benchmark
Basin Plan
26
19.
27
28
Action Plan for Table 1 Exceedances. If the result(s) from any sampling event(s)
4
Several of the values in the table are hardness dependent, as indicated in boldface type. Values based on 2008 EPA
Benchmarks assume hardness of 101 mg/l CaCO3.
[Proposed] Consent Decree
10
Civil Case No. 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD
1
conducted during a Wet Season reveals any contaminant at a concentration above the numeric value(s)
2
specified in Table 1, Defendants shall submit a plan to Plaintiff for reducing the level of contaminant to,
3
or below, Table 1 levels (“Action Plan”). An Action Plan shall be submitted by July 1 following the Wet
4
Season during which the numeric value exceedance(s) occurs. Defendants shall only submit one Action
5
Plan per Wet Season, if at all, for a maximum of two (2) Action Plans during the term of this Consent
6
Decree. Nothing herein shall be construed as an admission by Defendants that the values in Table 1 must
7
be achieved in order for the Facility to be in compliance with either the Storm Water Permit or the New
8
Storm Water Permit.
9
20.
Action Plan Requirements. Each Action Plan submitted shall include at a minimum: (1)
10
the identification of the contaminant(s) discharged in excess of the numeric value(s); (2) an assessment
11
of the source of each contaminant discharged in excess of the numeric value(s); (3) the identification of
12
additional BMPs, including treating storm water prior to discharge from the Facility, that will reduce
13
pollutant concentrations; and (4) time schedules for implementation of the proposed BMPs. The time
14
schedule(s) for implementation shall ensure that all BMPs are implemented as soon as possible but at
15
least by the beginning of the upcoming Wet Season (i.e., by October 1) unless the Settling Parties agree
16
on a later date based on the time needed to design, procure, and install the necessary equipment. Any
17
disputes over the deadline for implementation of additional BMPs identified in an Action Plan shall be
18
resolved pursuant to the dispute resolution provisions of this Consent Decree, set out in Section III
19
below.
20
21.
Action Plan Review. CSPA shall have thirty (30) days upon receipt of Defendants’
21
Action Plan to provide Defendants with comments on the Action Plan. Defendants have thirty (30) days
22
upon receipt of CSPA’s comments on the Action Plan, to consider CSPA’s comments, and shall either
23
incorporate them into the Action Plan or, if Defendants decline to accept one or more of CSPA’s
24
comments, provide CSPA with a written explanation of the grounds for rejection on or before the end of
25
the thirty (30) day period. Disputes regarding the adequacy of a particular BMP shall not impact the
26
schedule for implementing any other BMP set forth in the Action Plan, except to the extent an
27
undisputed BMP is related to a disputed BMP. Any disputes as to the adequacy of the Action Plan shall
28
be resolved pursuant to the dispute resolution provisions of this Consent Decree, set out in Section III
[Proposed] Consent Decree
11
Civil Case No. 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD
1
below.
2
22.
Defendants shall contact Plaintiff to request an extension of any deadline set forth in this
3
Consent Decree, if necessary, to implement any structural BMPs requiring agency approval. Plaintiff’s
4
consent to Defendants’ requested extension shall not be unreasonably withheld.
5
Defendants shall revise their SWPPP and Monitoring & Reporting Plan (“M&RP”) as
23.
6
applicable within thirty (30) days to reflect the changes required by an Action Plan. Defendants shall
7
notify CSPA in writing when the Action Plan has been completely implemented.
8
9
D.
Storm Water Sampling.
24.
Sampling. During the life of this Consent Decree, Defendants agree to collect storm water
10
samples from each location where storm water is discharged from the Facility from at least four (4)
11
qualifying rain events per Wet Season. All sampling shall be conducted as described in subparagraphs a.
12
through j.
13
14
a.
For purposes of this Consent Decree, a qualifying rain event is one that produces a
discharge and is preceded by forty-eight (48) hours without a discharge.
15
b.
Defendants shall sample within four (4) hours of: (1) the start of discharge, or (2) the
16
start of Facility operations if the qualifying rain event (as identified in (a), above) occurs within the
17
previous twelve (12) hour period. Nothing herein shall be construed to require Defendants to collect
18
storm water samples outside of the Facility’s normal hours of operation.
19
c.
If, prior to March 1 of a Wet Season, Defendants have been unable to collect samples
20
from two (2) qualifying rain events, Defendants shall satisfy the sampling requirements of this Consent
21
Decree by sampling non-qualifying rain events, but shall still endeavor to collect samples from a
22
qualifying rain event.
23
d.
Defendants agree to collect storm water samples from other discharge point(s) at the
24
Facility that are created due to a change in operation or other circumstances, or are otherwise required to
25
be sampled by the Storm Water Permit, the New Storm Water Permit, or this Consent Decree.
26
27
28
e.
Defendants shall analyze each storm water sample for the contaminants set forth in
f.
A laboratory accredited by the State of California shall analyze all samples collected
Table 1.
[Proposed] Consent Decree
12
Civil Case No. 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD
1
pursuant to this Consent Decree.
2
3
g.
contaminants at or below the values specified in Table 1.
4
5
h.
i.
10
11
Defendants shall request that sample-analysis results be reported to it within ten (10)
business days of laboratory receipt of the sample.
8
9
All samples collected from the Facility shall be delivered to the laboratory as
necessary to ensure that sample “hold time” is not exceeded.
6
7
The laboratory shall use analytical methods adequate to detect the individual
j.
Defendants shall provide CSPA with the lab results, including a copy of the complete
laboratory report of all samples collected at the Facility, within five (5) business days of receiving the
results.
E.
12
Visual Observations.
25.
All BMPs shall be visually inspected at least weekly and after significant rain events. In
13
addition, all visual observations of storm water discharges shall be conducted in accordance with the
14
terms of the Storm Water Permit and this Consent Decree. During the life of this Consent Decree,
15
Defendants shall continue to conduct Daily Rain Checks at the Facility, documenting any rain events
16
that occur during working hours, including any associated discharge. Defendants shall maintain logs of
17
the Daily Rain Checks, which shall be included in Defendants’ Annual Reports submitted to the
18
Regional Board, and within ten (10) days of receipt of Plaintiff’s written request.
19
20
F.
Employee Training.
26.
Within sixty (60) days of the Effective Date, Defendants shall conduct additional
21
employee training in order to familiarize employees at the Facility as appropriate with the requirements
22
of the Storm Water Permit and this Consent Decree. The training program shall include use of written
23
training materials needed for effective implementation of the training program. Defendants shall also
24
ensure that there are a sufficient number of employees assigned to implement the BMPs and conduct
25
other compliance activities required by the Storm Water Permit and this Consent Decree, and that these
26
employees are properly trained to perform the required activities.
27
28
27.
The training program shall require at least the following:
a.
Non-Storm Water Discharge Training. The Defendants shall continue to train
[Proposed] Consent Decree
13
Civil Case No. 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD
1
employees, as appropriate to their particular job descriptions, on the Storm Water Permit’s prohibition of
2
non-storm water discharges, so that employees know what non-storm water discharges are, which can
3
result from improper draining of automobile fluids, and how to detect and prevent them;
4
b.
BMP Training. The Defendants shall continue to train employees, as appropriate to
5
their particular job descriptions, on BMP implementation and maintenance to ensure that BMPs are
6
implemented effectively to prevent or minimize the exposure of pollutants to storm water, to prevent or
7
minimize the discharge of contaminated storm water, and to ensure the proper treatment of storm water
8
at the Facility;
9
c.
Sampling Training. The Defendants shall designate an adequate number of employees
10
to ensure the collection of storm water samples from each discharge location as required by this Consent
11
Decree and/or the Storm Water Permit. The training shall continue to include the proper sampling
12
protocols, including chain of custody requirements, to ensure storm water samples are properly
13
collected, stored, and submitted to a certified laboratory.
14
d.
Visual Observation Training. The Defendants shall provide training to all individuals
15
performing visual observations at the Facility pursuant to this Consent Decree and/or the Storm Water
16
Permit.
17
28.
Training shall continue to be provided on an annual basis, or as otherwise required to
18
ensure compliance with the terms of this Consent Decree, by a private consultant or a representative of
19
Defendants who is familiar with the requirements of this Consent Decree and the Storm Water Permit.
20
The training shall be repeated as necessary to ensure that employees are familiar with the requirements
21
of this Consent Decree, the Storm Water Permit, and the Facility’s SWPPP and M&RP, as appropriate
22
to the particular employee’s job descriptions. Any new employee who is responsible for implementation
23
of any portion of the SWPPP, the M&RP, or compliance with other terms of the Storm Water Permit or
24
Consent Decree shall receive training within thirty (30) days after being hired or before being
25
responsible for compliance with the terms of the Storm Water Permit or Consent Decree.
26
29.
The Defendants shall maintain training records to document compliance with Section II.F
27
of this Consent Decree, and shall make these records available for Plaintiff’s review at the Facility. The
28
Training Program shall be specified in the SWPPP and Defendants shall modify the SWPPP as
[Proposed] Consent Decree
14
Civil Case No. 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD
1
2
3
4
necessary to reflect the training program required by this Consent Decree.
G.
Storm Water Pollution Prevention and Monitoring and Reporting Plans.
30.
Within sixty (60) days after the Effective Date of this Consent Decree, Defendants shall
further revise their SWPPP and their M&RP to the extent necessary to:
5
a.
Include current BMPs;
6
b.
Incorporate the requirements of the Storm Water Permit and this Consent Decree;
7
c.
Incorporate BMPs identified and developed pursuant to this Consent Decree;
8
d.
Include information contained in other documents that the SWPPP and/or M&RP refer
9
to, such as CADG documents, as appendices to the SWPPP and/or M&RP;
10
e.
Identify the individuals responsible for compliance with the Storm Water Permit and
11
this Consent Decree including specifying which position or job description is responsible for what area
12
of compliance (e.g., Store Manager, collecting samples);
13
14
f.
all information required by the Storm Water Permit and this Consent Decree;
15
16
g.
Identification of specific pollutant(s) associated with each industrial activity and/or
pollutant source, and BMPs for each potential pollutant source;
17
18
Include a site map that includes at a minimum current conditions at the Facility, and
h.
Description of specific maintenance of structural BMPs such as maintenance on the
filtration system, secondary containment, and berms.
19
i.
Include, and modify as applicable, Defendants’ visual inspection checklist that will be
20
used by trained Facility personnel when conducting the visual observations and monitoring of storm
21
water required under the Storm Water Permit and this Consent Decree.
22
j.
Include the Storm Water Permit’s sampling and monitoring requirements including
23
but not limited to the Facility’s sample locations, and sample analysis for all applicable pollutants
24
including at a minimum those listed in Table 1.
25
31.
Commenting on the SWPPP and M&RP Revisions. Defendants shall submit the revised
26
SWPPP and M&RP to CSPA for review and comment as soon as it is completed but in any event no
27
later than sixty (60) days after the Effective Date. CSPA shall provide comments, if any, to Defendants
28
within thirty (30) days of receipt of the SWPPP and M&RP. Within thirty (30) days after receipt of
[Proposed] Consent Decree
15
Civil Case No. 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD
1
comments from CSPA, Defendants shall incorporate CSPA’s comments into the SWPPP and M&RP or
2
shall justify in writing why any comment is not incorporated. Any disputes over the adequacy of the
3
revised SWPPP and M&RP shall be resolved pursuant to the dispute resolution provisions of this
4
Consent Decree, set out in Section III below.
5
32.
Additional Revisions to SWPPP and M&RP. Defendants shall revise the SWPPP and
6
M&RP if there are any changes in the Facility’s operations that may possibly affect the quality of storm
7
water discharges at the Facility, including but not limited to changes to storm water discharge point(s) or
8
changes or additions to the BMPs at the Facility resulting from an Action Plan. Defendants shall submit
9
any revised SWPPP and M&RP to CSPA for review and comment within five (5) days of completion.
10
CSPA shall provide comments, if any, to Defendants within thirty (30) days of receipt of any revised
11
SWPPP and M&RP. Within thirty (30) days of receiving comments from CSPA, Defendants shall
12
incorporate CSPA’s comments into any revised SWPPP and M&RP or shall justify in writing why any
13
comment is not incorporated. Any disputes as to the adequacy of the SWPPP and M&RP shall be
14
resolved pursuant to the dispute resolution provisions of this Consent Decree, set out in Section III
15
below.
16
17
H.
33.
Compliance Monitoring and Reporting
Site Inspections. Each year during the life of this Consent Decree, Plaintiff and its
18
representatives may conduct up to two (2) site inspections at the Facility, plus an additional inspection if
19
there is a dispute regarding compliance with the terms of this Consent Decree. The site inspections shall
20
occur during normal business hours, and Plaintiff shall provide Defendants with three (3) business days
21
advance notice of an intended inspection during the dry season, and at least forty-eight (48) hours
22
advance notice for a Wet Season inspection. Plaintiff agrees that during inspections, Plaintiff’s
23
representatives will wear safety goggles, hard hats, ear plugs and vests, which will be provided by
24
Defendants. Plaintiff also agrees to wear appropriate clothing and footwear, and remain in the presence
25
of PNP representatives at all times. If Plaintiff seeks to enter a portion of the Facility that Defendants
26
deem unsafe, the Settling Parties will discuss Defendants’ concern in an attempt to resolve the concern
27
so the inspection can continue. If the Settling Parties cannot resolve Defendants’ concern, any disputes
28
regarding the conduct of an inspection shall be resolved pursuant to the dispute resolution provisions of
[Proposed] Consent Decree
16
Civil Case No. 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD
1
this Consent Decree, set out in Section III below. In addition, if Plaintiff discloses any information to the
2
public that was collected during the inspection, including observations, notes, analytical data or other
3
information, all such information shall be shared with Defendants at the same time it is made available
4
to the public.
5
34.
During the site inspection, Plaintiff and/or its representatives shall be allowed access to
6
the Facility’s SWPPP, M&RP, and other monitoring records, reports, and sampling data pertaining to
7
storm water, and/or compliance with this Consent Decree, for the Facility. In addition, during the site
8
inspection, Plaintiff and/or its representatives may collect samples of discharges from the Facility in the
9
presence of Defendants or their representatives. Any samples collected by Plaintiff shall be submitted to
10
a certified California laboratory for analysis in accordance with the provisions of Paragraph 24 of this
11
Consent Decree. Copies of the complete laboratory reports shall be provided to Defendants within five
12
(5) business days of receipt. At the request of Defendants, Plaintiff shall, if sufficient flow is available,
13
provide Defendants with duplicate samples of any samples collected by Plaintiff, provided that nothing
14
herein shall require Defendants to submit such samples for analysis. If Defendants request duplicate
15
samples, they shall provide the necessary sample container(s) to Plaintiff for this purpose. If Defendants
16
elect to analyze the duplicate samples, the analyses shall be conducted in accordance with the
17
requirements of Paragraph 24, and a copy of the final laboratory report shall be provided to Plaintiff
18
with five (5) business days of receipt of the results.
19
35.
Compliance Monitoring and Oversight. Defendants shall pay Plaintiff the sum of Four
20
Thousand Dollars ($4,000.00) per year (totaling $8,000.00) during the term of the Consent Decree to
21
help defray Plaintiff’s costs of monitoring and overseeing Defendants’ compliance with this Consent
22
Decree. Payment of Four Thousand Dollars ($4,000.00) shall be made within ten (10) days after the
23
Effective Date, and Four Thousand Dollars ($4,000.00) on the first anniversary of the Effective Date.
24
Defendants’ checks shall be made payable to: “Lawyers for Clean Water Attorney Client Trust
25
Account” and shall be delivered by certified mail or overnight delivery to: Lawyers for Clean Water,
26
Inc., 1004-A O’Reilly Avenue, San Francisco, California 94129.
27
28
36.
Action Plan Payments. If Defendants are required to submit an Action Plan to CSPA in
accordance with Paragraph 19, Defendants shall make Action Plan payments payable to: “Lawyers for
[Proposed] Consent Decree
17
Civil Case No. 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD
1
Clean Water Attorney Client Trust Account” and shall deliver such payments by certified mail or
2
overnight delivery to: Lawyers for Clean Water, Inc., 1004-A O’Reilly Avenue, San Francisco,
3
California 94129 at the time the Action Plan is submitted to CSPA. The Action Plan payments shall be
4
made as follows:
5
a.
Limited Action Plan Payment. In circumstances where there are no more than two (2)
6
contaminants exceeding Table 1 numeric values in no more than a single rain event in a Wet Season,
7
and sampling was conducted as required by this Consent Decree and the Storm Water Permit,
8
Defendants shall make an additional initial compliance monitoring payment in the amount of Five
9
Hundred Dollars ($500.00) upon submission of the Action Plan. For example, if copper and zinc were
10
the only parameters exceeded for the entire Wet Season and were exceeded only once, then payment
11
under this subsection will be made. If zinc and copper were each exceeded in one sample event, and zinc
12
was exceeded during a second sample event, payment will be made under subsection b. below.
13
b.
Regular Action Plan Payment. In all other circumstances, Defendants shall make an
14
initial additional compliance monitoring payment in the amount of One Thousand Five Hundred Dollars
15
($1,500.00) upon submission of the Action Plan.
16
c.
Thereafter, in the event that the initial payment is insufficient to cover the cost of CSPA’s
17
review of the Action Plan, Defendants agree to reimburse CSPA its additional costs, up to a maximum
18
of One Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($1,500.00), for a total Action Plan payment of Three Thousand
19
Dollars ($3,000.00) for any single Action Plan. Plaintiff shall submit an invoice to Defendants
20
documenting its additional costs, which shall be paid within thirty (30) days of receipt in accordance
21
with the provisions of this paragraph.
22
37.
Reporting and Document Provision. During the life of this Consent Decree, Defendants
23
shall copy Plaintiff on all documents related to water quality at the Facility that are submitted to the
24
Regional Board, the State Board, and/or any State or local agency or municipality. Such reports and
25
documents shall be provided to Plaintiff concurrently as they are sent to the agencies and/or
26
municipalities. Any correspondence related to Defendants’ compliance with the Storm Water Permit or
27
storm water quality received by Defendants from any regulatory agency, State or local agency, county or
28
municipality shall be provided to CSPA within five (5) business days of receipt by Defendants.
[Proposed] Consent Decree
18
Civil Case No. 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD
1
I.
2
38.
Environmental Project, Litigation Fees and Costs, and Stipulated Penalties
Environmental Mitigation Project. To remediate environmental harms as alleged in the
3
Complaint, Defendants shall pay Thirty Five Thousand Dollars ($35,000.00) to be used to fund
4
environmental project activities that will benefit the Sacramento River watershed, and, to the extent
5
possible, with an emphasis on its tributaries such as Antelope Creek (“the Mitigation Payment”). The
6
Mitigation Payment shall be paid to the Rose Foundation for Communities and the Environment, 6008
7
College Avenue, Suite 10, Oakland, California 94618 attention Tim Little. The Mitigation Payment shall
8
be made within sixty (60) days of the Effective Date of this Consent Decree, and Defendants shall
9
concurrently provide Plaintiff with a copy of such payment. Plaintiff shall coordinate with the Rose
10
Foundation to provide DOJ with the information set out in Paragraph 5 of the Notification on Receipt of
11
a Clean Air Act or Clean Water Act Citizen Suit Complaint (“Notification”) (DOJ, Environment and
12
Natural Resources Division, February 2012), attached hereto as Exhibit B. Plaintiff shall inform the
13
Rose Foundation that it is required to copy Defendants on any reporting to DOJ regarding the
14
disbursement of the Mitigation Payment. No portion of the Mitigation Payment may be made to
15
Plaintiff.
16
39.
CSPA’s Fees and Costs. Defendants agree to reimburse CSPA for its investigation fees
17
and costs, expert/consultant fees and costs, reasonable attorneys’ fees, and other costs incurred as a
18
result of investigating and preparing this lawsuit, and negotiating a resolution of this matter, in an
19
amount totaling Sixty-Six Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($66,500.00), which amount shall be paid in
20
full for Lawyers for Clean Water’s fees and costs, and any experts that were retained in connection with
21
this matter. Such payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date, payable to:
22
“Lawyers for Clean Water Attorney Client Trust Account” and delivered by certified mail or overnight
23
delivery to: Lawyers for Clean Water, Inc., 1004-A O’Reilly Avenue, San Francisco, California 94129.
24
40.
Stipulated Payment. The Defendants shall make a stipulated payment of One Thousand
25
Dollars ($1,000.00) for each missed deadline included in this Consent Decree. Payments for a missed
26
deadline shall be made to fund environmental project activities that will benefit the Rocklin-San Joaquin
27
River Delta and its watershed and shall be made to the Rose Foundation to the address listed above. The
28
Defendants agree to make the stipulated payment within thirty (30) days of a missed deadline.
[Proposed] Consent Decree
19
Civil Case No. 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD
1
Defendants shall provide Plaintiff with a copy of each such payment at the time it is made.
2
41.
Interest Payments. In the event of late payment of any of the sums due to Plaintiff under
3
this Consent Decree, the Defendants shall pay ten-percent (10%) APR interest to Plaintiff, which shall
4
accrue from the first day past the date the sum was due until the date the Defendants tender payment. All
5
such payments shall be made payable to: “Lawyers for Clean Water Attorney Client Trust Account” and
6
delivered by certified mail or overnight delivery to: Lawyers for Clean Water, Inc., 1004-A O’Reilly
7
Avenue, San Francisco, California 94129.
8
III.
9
DISPUTE RESOLUTION
42.
This Court shall retain jurisdiction over this matter until the Consent Decree terminates in
10
accordance with Paragraph 8 for the purposes of implementing and enforcing the terms and conditions
11
of this Consent Decree, and adjudicating all disputes among the Settling Parties that may arise under the
12
provisions of this Consent Decree. The Court shall have the power to enforce this Consent Decree with
13
all available legal and equitable remedies, including contempt.
14
43.
Meet and Confer. A Settling Party to this Consent Decree shall invoke the dispute
15
resolution procedures of this Section by notifying all other Settling Parties in writing of the matter(s) in
16
dispute. The Settling Parties shall then meet and confer in good faith (either telephonically or in person)
17
in an attempt to resolve the dispute informally over a period of twenty (20) calendar days from the date
18
of the notice.
19
44.
If the Settling Parties cannot resolve a dispute by the end of meet and confer informal
20
negotiations, the party initiating the dispute resolution provision may invoke formal dispute resolution
21
by filing a motion before the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. The
22
Settling Parties agree not to object to an expedited hearing schedule on the motion if one of the Settling
23
Parties requests one.
24
45.
Burden of Proof. In the event of any disagreement or dispute between Plaintiff and
25
Defendants over the necessity or appropriateness of implementing any particular BMP or set of BMPs,
26
including in any formal or informal proceeding brought to enforce the terms of this Consent Decree,
27
Defendants shall bear the burden of demonstrating that its BMPs, collectively, constitute BAT/BCT for
28
the Facility, or that they are in compliance with the terms of this Consent Decree. Plaintiff shall not be
[Proposed] Consent Decree
20
Civil Case No. 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD
1
required to prove that Defendants’ BMPs do not constitute BAT/BCT.
2
46.
Litigation costs and fees incurred in conducting meet and confer or otherwise addressing
3
and/or resolving any dispute, including an alleged breach of this Consent Decree, shall be awarded in
4
accord with the standard established by Section 505 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1365, and case
5
law interpreting that standard.
6
IV.
7
MUTUAL RELEASE OF LIABILITY AND COVENANT NOT TO SUE
47.
CSPA’s Release. Upon the Effective Date of this Consent Decree, CSPA, on its own
8
behalf and on behalf of its current and former officers, directors, employees, subsidiaries, and affiliates,
9
and each of their successors and assigns, and its agents, attorneys, and other representatives releases all
10
persons including, without limitation, Defendants and each of their current and former officers,
11
directors, members, employees, shareholders and each of their predecessors, successors and assigns, and
12
each of their agents, attorneys, consultants, and other representatives from, and waives all claims which
13
arise from or pertain to this action, including all claims for injunctive relief, damages, penalties, fines,
14
sanctions, mitigation, fees (including fees of attorneys, experts, and others), costs, expenses or any other
15
sum incurred or claimed, and/or claims that were asserted in CSPA’s Notice Letter and Complaint up to
16
the Effective Date.
17
48.
Defendants' Release. Upon the Effective Date of this Consent Decree, Defendants, on
18
each of their own behalves and on behalf of their current and former officers, directors, employees,
19
members, and each of their successors and assigns, and their agents, attorneys, and other representatives
20
releases CSPA (and its current and former officers, directors, employees, members, parents, subsidiaries,
21
and affiliates, and each of their successors and assigns, and its agents, attorneys, and other
22
representatives) from, and waives all claims which arise from or pertain to this action, including all
23
claims for fees (including fees of attorneys, experts, and others), costs, expenses or any other sum
24
incurred or claimed or which could have been claimed for matters associated with or related to CSPA’s
25
Notice Letter and Complaint up to the Effective Date.
26
49.
Nothing in this Consent Decree limits or otherwise affects CSPA’s right to address or
27
take any position that it deems necessary or appropriate in any formal or informal proceeding before the
28
Regional Board, EPA, or any other judicial or administrative body on any other matter relating to storm
[Proposed] Consent Decree
21
Civil Case No. 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD
1
water discharges from the Facility occurring or arising after the Effective Date of the Consent Decree
2
but specifically excluding the discharges and all other matters addressed by this Consent Decree.
3
V.
4
MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
50.
No Admission of Liability. Neither this Consent Decree, the implementation of additional
5
BMPs, nor any payment pursuant to the Consent Decree shall constitute or be construed as a finding,
6
adjudication, admission or acknowledgment of any fact, law, or liability, nor shall it be construed as an
7
admission of violation of any law, rule, or regulation. Defendants maintain and reserve all defenses they
8
may have to any alleged violations that may be raised in the future.
9
51.
Force Majeure. Force Majeure includes any act of God, war, fire, earthquake, windstorm,
10
flood or natural catastrophe; civil disturbance, vandalism, sabotage or terrorism; restraint by court order
11
or public authority or agency; or action or non-action by, or inability to obtain the necessary
12
authorizations or approvals from any governmental agency. Force Majeure shall not include normal
13
inclement weather, economic hardship, or inability to pay. Any Settling Party seeking to rely upon this
14
paragraph to excuse or postpone performance, shall have the burden of establishing that it could not
15
reasonably have been expected to avoid the force majeure event and which by exercise of due diligence
16
has been unable to overcome the failure of performance. The Settling Parties shall exercise due diligence
17
to resolve and remove any force majeure event.
18
52.
Construction. The language in all parts of this Consent Decree shall be construed
19
according to its plain and ordinary meaning, except as to those terms defined in the Storm Water Permit,
20
the Clean Water Act, or specifically herein.
21
53.
Choice of Law. The laws of the United States shall govern this Consent Decree.
22
54.
Severability. In the event that any provision, paragraph, section, or sentence of this
23
Consent Decree is held by a court to be unenforceable, the validity of the enforceable provisions shall
24
not be adversely affected.
25
55.
Correspondence. All notices required herein or any other correspondence pertaining to
26
this Consent Decree shall be sent by overnight mail or courier or by electronic mail, with request for
27
confirmation receipt, as follows:
If to Plaintiff:
28
[Proposed] Consent Decree
22
Civil Case No. 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Layne Friedrich
Layne@lawyersforcleanwater.com
Drevet Hunt
Drev@lawyersforcleanwater.com
Lawyers for Clean Water, Inc.
1004-A O’Reilly Avenue
San Francisco, California 94129
With copies to:
Bill Jennings, Executive Director
Deltakeep@me.com
California Sportfishing Protection Alliance
3536 Rainier Avenue
Stockton, California 95204
If to Defendants:
Margaret Rosegay
margaret.rosegay@pillsburylaw.com
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
Four Embarcadero Center, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
With copies to:
Charina Gaspay
cgaspay@picknpull.com
Pick-n-Pull EHS Department
10850 Gold Center Drive, Suite 325
Rancho Cordova, California 95670
Michael Brinkley
mbrinkley@picknpull.com
Pick-N-Pull Auto Dismantlers
10850 Gold Center Drive, Suite 325
Rancho Cordova, California 95670
Notifications of communications shall be deemed submitted the next business day after having
22
been deposited with an overnight mail/delivery service. Any change of address or addresses shall be
23
communicated in the manner described above for giving notices. In addition, the Settling Parties may
24
agree to transmit documents electronically or by facsimile.
25
56.
Effect of Consent Decree. Except as provided herein, Plaintiff does not, by its consent to
26
this Consent Decree, warrant or aver in any manner that Defendants’ compliance with this Consent
27
Decree will constitute or result in compliance with any Federal or State law or regulation. Nothing in
28
this Consent Decree shall be construed to affect or limit in any way the obligation of Defendants to
[Proposed] Consent Decree
23
Civil Case No. 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD
1
comply with all Federal, State, and local laws and regulations governing any activity required by this
2
Consent Decree.
3
57.
Counterparts. This Consent Decree may be executed in any number of counterparts, all of
4
which together shall constitute one original document. Telecopy, email of a .pdf signature and/or
5
facsimile copies of original signature shall be deemed to be originally executed counterparts of this
6
Consent Decree.
7
58.
Modification of the Consent Decree. This Consent Decree, and any provisions herein,
8
may not be changed, waived, discharged, or terminated unless by a written instrument, signed by the
9
Settling Parties.
10
59.
Dismissal of Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc. Following entry of this Consent Decree by
11
this Court, Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc. shall be dismissed from this litigation with prejudice, and
12
shall not be considered a Settling Party or otherwise bound by the terms of this Consent Decree.
13
60.
Full Settlement. This Consent Decree constitutes a full and final settlement of this matter.
14
61.
Integration Clause. This is an integrated Consent Decree. This Consent Decree is
15
intended to be a full and complete statement of the terms of the agreement between the Settling Parties
16
and expressly supersedes any and all prior oral or written agreements covenants, representations, and
17
warranties (express or implied) concerning the subject matter of this Consent Decree.
18
62.
Authority. The undersigned representatives for Plaintiff and Defendants each certify that
19
he/she is fully authorized by the party whom he/she represents to enter into the terms and conditions of
20
this Consent Decree.
21
63.
The provisions of this Consent Decree apply to and bind the Settling Parties, including
22
any successors or assigns. The Settling Parties certify that their undersigned representatives are fully
23
authorized to enter into this Consent Decree, to execute it on behalf of the Settling Parties, and to legally
24
bind the Settling Parties to its terms.
25
64.
The Settling Parties agree to be bound by this Consent Decree and not to contest its
26
validity in any subsequent proceeding to implement or enforce its terms. By entering into this Consent
27
Decree, the Defendants do not admit liability for any purpose as to any allegation or matter arising out
28
of this Action.
[Proposed] Consent Decree
24
Civil Case No. 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD
1
2
3
4
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Consent Decree as of the date first
set forth above.
IT IS SO ORDERED:
Dated: November 25, 2014
5
6
7
8
APPROVED AS TO FORM
LAWYERS FOR CLEAN WATER, INC.
Dated: _____________2014
By: ___________________________
Layne Friedrich
Attorney for Plaintiff
9
10
11
12
PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP
13
14
Dated: _____________2014
15
16
By: ___________________________
Margaret Rosegay
Attorney for Defendants
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT
17
18
Dated: _____________2014
19
By: ___________________________
Bill Jennings
California Sportfishing Protection Alliance
20
21
Dated: _____________2014
By: ___________________________
Michael Brinkley
Pick and Pull Auto Dismantling, Inc.
Dated: _____________2014
22
By: ___________________________
Michael Brinkley
Norprop, Inc.
Dated: _____________2014
By: ___________________________
Michael Brinkley
23
24
25
26
27
28
[Proposed] Consent Decree
25
Civil Case No. 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD
Pick-N-Pull Auto Dismantlers
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[Proposed] Consent Decree
26
Civil Case No. 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?