California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Pick-N-Pull Auto Dismantlers et al

Filing 21

ORDER; CONSENT DECREE signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 11/25/14. (Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Layne Friedrich (Bar No. 195431) Layne@lawyersforcleanwater.com Drevet Hunt (Bar No. 240487) Drev@lawyersforcleanwater.com LAWYERS FOR CLEAN WATER, INC. 1004-A O’Reilly Avenue San Francisco, California 94129 Telephone: (415) 440-6520 Facsimile: (415) 440-4155 Attorneys for Plaintiff CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE 8 9 10 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 14 15 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE, a non-profit corporation, 16 17 Plaintiff, Civil Case No.: 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD [PROPOSED] CONSENT DECREE v. 18 PICK-N-PULL AUTO DISMANTLERS, et al. 19 20 Defendants. (Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq.) 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [Proposed] Consent Decree Civil Case No. 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD 1 CONSENT DECREE 2 The following Consent Decree is entered into by and between Plaintiff California Sportfishing 3 Protection Alliance (“Plaintiff” or “CSPA”), and Defendants Pick-N-Pull Auto Dismantlers, a California 4 general partnership, Pick and Pull Auto Dismantling, Inc., and Norprop, Inc. (collectively “Defendants” 5 or “PNP”). The entities entering into this Consent Decree are each an individual “Settling Party” and 6 collectively “Settling Parties.” 7 WHEREAS, CSPA is a non-profit public benefit corporation dedicated to the preservation, 8 protection, and restoration of the environment, the wildlife and the natural resources of all waters of 9 California, including the Sacramento River, the American River, and the Sacramento-San Joaquin River 10 Delta; 11 WHEREAS, Plaintiff alleges that Pick and Pull Auto Dismantling, Inc., Schnitzer Steel 12 Industries, Inc., Auto Parts Group, Norprop Inc., and Pick-N-Pull Auto Dismantlers are each an owner 13 and/or operator of the automobile dismantling and used auto parts facility located at 6355 Pacific Street 14 Rocklin, California, 95677 (hereinafter the “Facility”). As long as Defendants implement the BMPs 15 identified in Paragraph 14 hereof, and no industrial activity occurs in the Customer Parking Lot, the 16 Customer Parking Lot shall not be considered part of the Facility; 17 WHEREAS, Defendants aver that Pick-N-Pull Auto Dismantlers is the owner and operator of 18 the Facility, and is responsible for compliance with the requirements of the Federal Water Pollution 19 Control Act, 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251, et seq. (“Clean Water Act” or “CWA”) at the Facility; 20 21 22 23 WHEREAS, the general partners of Pick-N-Pull Auto Dismantlers are Pick and Pull Auto Dismantling, Inc. and Norprop, Inc.; WHEREAS, Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc. is the parent corporation of Pick and Pull Auto Dismantling, Inc., Norprop Inc., and Pick-N-Pull Auto Dismantlers; 24 WHEREAS, Defendants’ operations involve the de-pollution and recycling of end-of-life 25 vehicles, thus contributing to protection of the environment and conservation of natural resources; 26 27 WHEREAS, storm water at the Facility discharges from one outfall into the municipal separate storm sewer system operated by the City of Rocklin (“MS4”); 28 [Proposed] Consent Decree 1 Civil Case No. 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD 1 WHEREAS, Plaintiff contends that operations at the Facility result in discharges of pollutants 2 into Facility storm drains, and that those storm drains discharge to surface waters, including Antelope 3 Creek, which are tributaries to the Sacramento River; 4 WHEREAS, discharges from the Facility are currently regulated by the National Pollutant 5 Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”) General Permit No. CAS000001 [State Water Resources 6 Control Board] Water Quality Order No. 92-12-DWQ, as amended by Order No. 97-03-DWQ (“Storm 7 Water Permit”) and the Clean Water Act; 8 WHEREAS, as of July 1, 2015, storm water discharges from the Facility will be regulated by 9 NPDES General Permit No. CAS000001 [State Water Resources Control Board] Water Quality Order 10 11 12 13 No. 2014-0057-DWQ (“New Storm Water Permit”); WHEREAS, Defendants are participants in the California Auto Dismantlers Group (“CADG”) Monitoring Program under the Storm Water Permit; WHEREAS, on March 21, 2014, Plaintiff sent Pick-N-Pull Auto Dismantlers, Pick and Pull 14 Auto Dismantling, Inc., Norprop, Inc. and Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc. a notice of intent to file suit 15 (“Notice Letter”) under Sections 505(a) and (b) of the CWA, 33 U.S.C. §§ 1365(a) and (b). The Notice 16 Letter alleged violations of Sections 301(a) and 402 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §§ 1311(a) and 17 1342, and violations of the Storm Water Permit. A copy of the Notice Letter was sent to the United 18 States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) Region IX, the State Water Resources Control Board 19 (“State Board”) and the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (“Regional Board”); 20 WHEREAS, on May 23, 2014, PNP submitted a detailed response to the Notice Letter to 21 Plaintiff, setting forth defenses to many of the alleged violations and describing the steps it had 22 undertaken to correct other alleged violations. Among other things, PNP’s response described the 23 structural and non-structural Best Management Practices (“BMPs”) employed by the Facility as part of 24 its Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (“SWPPP”) to reduce or prevent pollutants in storm water 25 discharges; 26 WHEREAS, storm water discharged by the Facility flows through Jensen storm water 27 interceptors, oil-water separators, and then is treated by a StormwateRx Clara 40C (a 5,000 gallon 28 capacity four-stage clarifier) and by a StormwateRx Aquip 110SBI treatment system prior to discharge [Proposed] Consent Decree 2 Civil Case No. 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD 1 to the MS4; 2 3 WHEREAS, Defendants allege that the StormwateRx Clara 40C was installed at the Facility in March 2011 and the StormwateRx Aquip 110SBI was installed in August 2013; 4 5 WHEREAS, Defendants provided Plaintiff with a copy of the current SWPPP for the Facility on May 23, 2014; 6 WHEREAS, on May 27, 2014, Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defendants, in the United 7 States District Court, Eastern District of California (Case No. 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD) alleging 8 ongoing violations of the CWA (hereinafter “Complaint”); 9 WHEREAS, Pick-N-Pull Auto Dismantlers, Pick and Pull Auto Dismantling, Inc., Norprop, 10 Inc., and Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc., deny all allegations in the Notice Letter and Complaint, and 11 maintain that their operations are in compliance with the requirements of the CWA and the Storm Water 12 Permit; 13 WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendants have agreed that it is in the Settling Parties’ mutual 14 interest to enter into a Consent Decree setting forth terms and conditions appropriate to resolving the 15 allegations set forth in the Complaint without further proceedings and without any admission of liability 16 on the part of the Defendants; and 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, all actions taken by Defendants pursuant to this Consent Decree shall be made in compliance with all applicable Federal and State laws and local rules and regulations. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BETWEEN THE SETTLING PARTIES AND ORDERED AND DECREED BY THE COURT AS FOLLOWS: 1. The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to Section 505(a)(1)(A) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1365(a)(1)(A). 2. Venue is appropriate in the Eastern District pursuant to Section 505(c)(1) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1365(c)(1), because the Facility at which the alleged violations took place is located within this District. 3. The Complaint states claims upon which, if true, relief may be granted pursuant to Section 505 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1365. 4. Plaintiff has standing to bring this action. [Proposed] Consent Decree 3 Civil Case No. 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD 1 5. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over this matter for purposes of enforcing the terms of 2 this Consent Decree for the life of the Consent Decree, or as long thereafter as is necessary for the Court 3 to resolve any pending motion to enforce this Consent Decree. 4 I. AGENCY REVIEW AND TERM OF CONSENT DECREE 5 6. Plaintiff shall submit this Consent Decree to the United States Department of Justice 6 (“DOJ”) and the EPA (collectively “Federal Agencies”) within four (4) days of the final signature of the 7 Settling Parties for agency review consistent with 40 C.F.R. § 135.5. In the event that the Federal 8 Agencies object to entry of this Consent Decree, the Settling Parties agree to meet and confer to attempt 9 to resolve the issue(s) raised by the Federal Agencies within a reasonable amount of time. 10 7. The term “Effective Date” as used in this Consent Decree shall mean the last day for the 11 Federal Agencies to comment on the Consent Decree, i.e., the forty-fifth (45th) day following the 12 Federal Agencies’ receipt of the Consent Decree, or the date on which the Federal Agencies provide 13 notice that they require no further review, whichever occurs earlier. 14 8. This Consent Decree will terminate two (2) years from the Effective Date, unless there is 15 an ongoing, unresolved dispute regarding Defendants’ compliance with this Consent Decree in which 16 case the Consent Decree will terminate upon final resolution of the dispute. 17 II. 18 COMMITMENTS OF THE SETTLING PARTIES A. 19 Storm Water Pollution Control Best Management Practices. 9. In addition to maintaining the current structural and non-structural BMPs described in the 20 Facility’s SWPPP,1 as noted below, Defendants shall develop and implement the additional BMPs 21 identified herein, as well as any other BMPs necessary to comply with the provisions of this Consent 22 Decree and the Storm Water Permit, including but not limited to developing and implementing BMPs 23 that, collectively, are the Best Available Technology Economically Achievable (“BAT”) and the Best 24 Conventional Treatment Technology (“BCT”), as well as those necessary to comply with the Storm 25 Water Permit’s Receiving Water Limitations. 26 27 28 10. Facility-Wide BMPs. 1 The current Facility SWPPP is attached hereto as Exhibit A, and contains the Facility map, which identifies the specific areas of the Facility referenced in this Consent Decree. [Proposed] Consent Decree 4 Civil Case No. 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD 1 a. Evacuation of Automobile Fluid(s). Except as set forth in subparagraph 11.a. 2 below, Defendants agree that they will continue to drain all automobile fluid(s) in the covered vehicle 3 Drain Building (identified on the Facility map). 4 b. Use of Tarping or Other Temporary Covering. Defendants shall continue to 5 inspect tarps and other temporary coverings that are used at the Facility to cover storage bins and other 6 containers used for automobile parts storage to ensure that the tarps and coverings are in place, intact, in 7 good condition and preventing the exposure of pollutant sources to precipitation. The inspections shall 8 take place as part of daily housekeeping activities and before rain events. All tarps or other covers shall 9 be repaired or replaced as necessary to prevent exposure of pollutant sources to precipitation. 10 c. Vehicle Part(s) Storage. Defendants shall continue to inspect the Customer Yard 11 for loose vehicle parts as part of its daily housekeeping activities. Loose vehicle part(s) that are 12 discovered as part of daily housekeeping activities shall be placed inside vehicles, beneath vehicles, or 13 in covered container(s), to prevent the exposure of pollutants to precipitation. Prior to and during rain 14 events, Defendants shall focus their efforts on collection of loose parts that have the greatest potential to 15 contribute pollutants to storm water, but shall not be in breach of this Consent Decree solely based on 16 the discovery of loose vehicle parts in the Customer Yard as long as this provision is being complied 17 with. 18 19 11. The Hold Area/De-Garbage Area. a. Consistent with its current operating procedures, Defendants shall not remove any 20 automotive fluid(s) from vehicles while they are located in the Hold Area/De-Garbage Area except 21 windshield wiper fluid, refrigerants, power steering fluid and brake fluid, all of which must be evacuated 22 by hand pump. Before draining of fluid(s) in the Hold Area/De-Garbage Area occurs, Defendants will 23 continue to ensure that BMP(s) are being implemented to (1) prevent spillage of fluids onto gravel, and 24 to (2) prevent releases of automotive fluids at the Hold Area/De-Garbage Area from flowing into drain 25 inlets. Once fluids are evacuated, they shall be emptied into appropriate containers stored under cover 26 within the designated storage areas of the Drain Building and Warehouse, consistent with current 27 operating procedures. 28 b. Defendants shall continue to prohibit the placement of any vehicle in the [Proposed] Consent Decree 5 Civil Case No. 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD 1 Customer Yard that has not been drained of fluid(s). 2 c. Defendants shall continue to stage and maintain spill kits in the vicinity of the 3 Hold Area/De-Garbage Area so they are readily available to employees engaged in the evacuation of 4 fluids. The kits shall be labeled in both English and Spanish and shall contain absorbent pillows, oil 5 pads, oil booms and other absorbent materials. Defendants shall continue to train employees engaged in 6 the evacuation of fluids on the proper use of the kits. 7 d. Consistent with existing operational procedures at the Facility, no automobile 8 dismantling or part(s) removal shall be conducted in the Hold Area/De-Garbage Area with the exception 9 of removal of batteries, wheel weights, mercury switches, and wheel rims. No storage of loose vehicle 10 part(s) shall occur in the Hold Area/De-Garbage Area. If rain is predicted, the engine compartment of 11 any vehicle(s) that does not have a hood will be covered at the end of the operating day to prevent 12 exposure of exposed vehicle part(s) to precipitation. 13 e. In the event the requirements for an Action Plan are triggered during the term of 14 this Consent Decree (see Paragraph 19 below), Defendants shall consider the implementation of 15 additional BMPs for the Hold Area/De-Garbage Area, such as paving, cover, or other BMPs to prevent 16 the exposure of pollutant source(s) to precipitation. Defendants agree to include a discussion of these 17 BMPs in the Action Plan, and why they are or are not to be developed and implemented to address 18 pollutant level exceedances in discharges. Additional BMPs shall be implemented by the beginning of 19 the next upcoming Wet Season2 as set forth in Paragraph 20 below. 20 12. 21 Cleaning and Maintaining Impervious Surfaces. a. Cleaning: Defendants steam-cleaned the Crush Pad at the Facility in June 2014. 22 Prior to October 1, 2015 and October 1, 2016, Defendants shall steam-clean the Crush Pad and other 23 impervious surfaces at the Facility to remove the build-up of contaminants. In the event the requirements 24 for an Action Plan are triggered during the term of this Consent Decree (see Paragraph 19 below), 25 Defendants shall increase the frequency of steam-cleaning and/or propose additional BMPs to address 26 pollutant level exceedances in discharges. While steam-cleaning, Defendants shall block Outfall #1 in 27 order to prevent any non-storm water from discharging from the Facility. 28 2 Defined as October 1 – May 31. [Proposed] Consent Decree 6 Civil Case No. 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD 1 b. Patching: After steam-cleaning impervious surfaces, Defendants shall patch, at a 2 minimum, all cracks that are 1/4 inch or wider. In addition, as part of its regularly scheduled paving 3 maintenance activities, Defendants shall repair concrete and other paved surfaces at the Facility by 4 patching and/or replacing the surfaces. 5 c. Sweeping: Within fifteen (15) days of the Effective Date, to the extent they have 6 not already done so, Defendants shall develop and implement a plan to sweep all impervious ground 7 surfaces at the Facility using a mechanical sweeper according to the following schedule: (1) at least once 8 a week during the Wet Season, (2) at least twenty-four (24) hours prior to any precipitation event where 9 more than 0.1 inches of rain is predicted in Rocklin with a minimum likelihood of occurrence of fifty- 10 percent (50%) by the National Weather Service, and (3) at least once per month during the Dry Season.3 11 Defendants shall keep a log of all sweeping done at the Facility. 12 13. Cleaning and Maintaining Gravel and Pervious Surfaces. Defendants shall continue to 13 implement their good housekeeping program and inspect the Facility for stained and or contaminated 14 gravel, dirt, and build-up on other pervious surfaces. Defendants shall inspect the surfaces in the 15 Customer Yard, Hold Area and De-Garbage Area on a daily basis, and shall continue to ensure the entire 16 Facility is inspected at least weekly. Consistent with existing operational procedures at the Facility, all 17 significantly stained and/or contaminated gravel shall be replaced upon inspection, except that 18 significantly stained and/or contaminated gravel located underneath a vehicle shall be replaced after the 19 vehicle row has been cleared. 20 14. 21 Customer Access and Use of the Facility. a. On-site Automobile Repair. Consistent with existing operational procedures at the 22 Facility, Defendants shall continue to maintain signage in the Customer Parking Lot in English and 23 Spanish, and implement other BMPs as necessary, to prohibit customers and other individuals from 24 using any portion of the Customer Parking Lot for any automobile repair or dismantling activities. 25 Defendants shall continue to maintain such signs including ensuring that the signage is kept in good 26 condition. 27 28 b. 3 Within forty-five (45) days of the Effective Date, to the extent they have not Defined as June 1 – September 30. [Proposed] Consent Decree 7 Civil Case No. 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD 1 already done so, Defendants shall post signage in English and Spanish in the Customer Yard directing 2 customers to close hoods of vehicles after they have finished part(s) removal. Defendants shall maintain 3 such signs including ensuring that the signage is kept in good condition. 4 c. Consistent with existing operational procedures at the Facility, to ensure that 5 customers are complying with the signage, and that the BMPs are effective, Defendants shall continue to 6 inspect the Customer Parking Lot at least once per day during operating hours and direct customers to 7 cease any unauthorized automobile repair or dismantling activities in the Customer Parking Lot when 8 such activity is observed. 9 d. Defendants shall continue to place drip pans, rugs, mats and/or scrap carpeting 10 under each vehicle in the Customer Yard. Defendants shall continue to implement the Facility’s 11 procedures for the inspection, disposal, and replacement of all drip pans, rugs, mats and/or scrap 12 carpeting to ensure that once they are unable to absorb additional fluid and contaminants they are 13 properly disposed of and replaced. 14 e. During the Wet Season, Defendants shall continue to require Facility employees 15 to close vehicle hoods as often as possible during operating hours. During the Dry Season, Defendants 16 shall require Facility employees to close vehicle hoods as part of regularly scheduled cleaning activities. 17 Defendants shall close vehicle hoods at least one (1) hour prior to the start of forecasted precipitation 18 with a likelihood of occurrence of sixty-percent (60%) and shall, to the extent feasible, focus their 19 efforts on maintaining vehicle hood closure during rain events. 20 15. Crush Pad Area. Defendants shall continue to ensure that no vehicle will be crushed 21 unless the fluids have been evacuated and/or drained from it. This requirement shall not be interpreted to 22 require the removal, prior to crushing, of vehicle engines, transmissions or other parts that contained 23 fluids during the operating life of the vehicle, so long as the vehicles have been drained following 24 Defendants’ operational protocols and the terms of this Consent Decree. The Settling Parties 25 acknowledge that it is impossible to remove one-hundred-percent (100%) of all automotive fluids from a 26 vehicle and that small amounts of residual fluid may remain. Consistent with the Facility’s existing 27 BMPs, Defendants shall implement BMPs at the Crush Pad to ensure that any residual fluids released 28 during the crushing process are cleaned up and removed, preventing their flow into drain inlets. These [Proposed] Consent Decree 8 Civil Case No. 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD 1 BMPs shall be implemented in addition to the Facility’s drain inlet protection BMPs. 2 16. Hazardous Material and Secondary Containment. The current inventory, handling and 3 management procedures for hazardous materials and hazardous wastes shall be detailed in the SWPPP. 4 All such hazardous materials and hazardous wastes shall continue to be stored in designated “Hazardous 5 Waste Storage Areas.” Hazardous Waste Storage Areas shall be indoors and fully enclosed as stated in 6 the SWPPP. Hazardous Waste Storage Areas shall have secondary containment for containers with 55 7 gallons or more of capacity, as required by applicable regulations, including 40 C.F.R. § 112.1(d). If 8 outdoors, Hazardous Waste Storage Areas shall be protected from exposure to precipitation by roof 9 cover and/or tarping. 10 11 B. Storm Water Drainage System. 17. 12 Discharge Locations and Storm Water Treatment. a. Defendants have re-routed the storm water system at the Facility so that all storm 13 water is directed through Jensen storm water interceptors and oil-water separators, which then flow to 14 the StormwateRx Clara 40C for initial treatment and then to the StormwateRx Aquip 110SBI for 15 additional treatment prior to discharge to Outfall #1, as identified on the attached Facility map (see 16 Exhibit A). Defendants have also implemented additional BMPs, such as containment berms and 17 grading, to ensure that storm water from the Facility is treated by the storm water systems described in 18 this paragraph. 19 b. Consistent with existing operational procedures, Defendants shall continue to 20 utilize straw wattles, filters, and/or oil absorbents at each drain inlet at the Facility. Defendants shall 21 continue to implement the Facility procedures for the inspection and maintenance of all drain inlet 22 BMPs to ensure the drain inlet BMPs are in place, working as intended, and are being replaced as 23 needed, and according to manufacturer’s schedule. The BMP drain inlet inspections shall continue to 24 occur on a regular basis during routine weekly inspections, and during and after each rain event. 25 26 27 28 c. Defendants shall continue to annually inspect the perimeter of the Facility, and make any necessary repairs to ensure there are no storm water discharges from the Facility perimeter. d. Defendants shall continue to ensure the storm water drainage culvert, as identified on the map attached hereto, remains free of debris including vehicle parts and/or storage of vehicles. [Proposed] Consent Decree 9 Civil Case No. 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD 1 e. Defendants shall continue to operate and maintain the existing Jensen storm water 2 interceptors, the oil-water separators, the StormwateRx Clara 40C and the StormwateRx Aquip 110SBI 3 throughout the term of this Consent Decree. 4 f. Defendants shall continue to inspect the Facility’s storm water treatment systems 5 and related treatment BMPs on a weekly basis, after significant storm events and remove from them any 6 debris or other materials not related to the control and treatment of storm water (e.g., wood, metal, 7 concrete and other debris). 8 C. 9 Reduction of Pollutants in Discharges. 18. Contaminant Reduction. Defendants shall develop and implement BMPs to reduce 10 pollutants in storm water discharges to levels below those in Table 1.4 However, the presence of any 11 contaminant in any discharge from the Facility in excess of the numeric values in Table 1 shall not be 12 considered a breach of this Consent Decree provided Defendants have implemented BMPs that achieve 13 BAT/BCT including, but not limited to, operation of the Jensen storm water interceptors, the oil-water 14 separators, the StormwateRx Clara 40C and the StormwateRx 110SBI, and other BMPs identified in the 15 Facility’s SWPPP and in this Consent Decree. 16 Table 1. Numeric Values for Facility Discharges 17 Contaminant Value Source of Value 18 Total Suspended Solids Total Recoverable Copper Total Recoverable Lead Total Recoverable Zinc Oil and Grease Total Recoverable Aluminum Total Cadmium Total Recoverable Iron Total Recoverable Mercury Biochemical Oxygen Demand pH 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 100 mg/L 0.0156 mg/L 0.095 mg/L 0.130 mg/ 15 mg/L 0.750 mg/L 0.0023 mg/L 1.0 mg/L 0.0014 mg/L 30 mg/L 6.5-8.5 units 2008 EPA Benchmark 2008 EPA Benchmark 2008 EPA Benchmark 2008 EPA Benchmark 2008 EPA Benchmark 2008 EPA Benchmark 2008 EPA Benchmark 2008 EPA Benchmark 2008 EPA Benchmark 2008 EPA Benchmark Basin Plan 26 19. 27 28 Action Plan for Table 1 Exceedances. If the result(s) from any sampling event(s) 4 Several of the values in the table are hardness dependent, as indicated in boldface type. Values based on 2008 EPA Benchmarks assume hardness of 101 mg/l CaCO3. [Proposed] Consent Decree 10 Civil Case No. 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD 1 conducted during a Wet Season reveals any contaminant at a concentration above the numeric value(s) 2 specified in Table 1, Defendants shall submit a plan to Plaintiff for reducing the level of contaminant to, 3 or below, Table 1 levels (“Action Plan”). An Action Plan shall be submitted by July 1 following the Wet 4 Season during which the numeric value exceedance(s) occurs. Defendants shall only submit one Action 5 Plan per Wet Season, if at all, for a maximum of two (2) Action Plans during the term of this Consent 6 Decree. Nothing herein shall be construed as an admission by Defendants that the values in Table 1 must 7 be achieved in order for the Facility to be in compliance with either the Storm Water Permit or the New 8 Storm Water Permit. 9 20. Action Plan Requirements. Each Action Plan submitted shall include at a minimum: (1) 10 the identification of the contaminant(s) discharged in excess of the numeric value(s); (2) an assessment 11 of the source of each contaminant discharged in excess of the numeric value(s); (3) the identification of 12 additional BMPs, including treating storm water prior to discharge from the Facility, that will reduce 13 pollutant concentrations; and (4) time schedules for implementation of the proposed BMPs. The time 14 schedule(s) for implementation shall ensure that all BMPs are implemented as soon as possible but at 15 least by the beginning of the upcoming Wet Season (i.e., by October 1) unless the Settling Parties agree 16 on a later date based on the time needed to design, procure, and install the necessary equipment. Any 17 disputes over the deadline for implementation of additional BMPs identified in an Action Plan shall be 18 resolved pursuant to the dispute resolution provisions of this Consent Decree, set out in Section III 19 below. 20 21. Action Plan Review. CSPA shall have thirty (30) days upon receipt of Defendants’ 21 Action Plan to provide Defendants with comments on the Action Plan. Defendants have thirty (30) days 22 upon receipt of CSPA’s comments on the Action Plan, to consider CSPA’s comments, and shall either 23 incorporate them into the Action Plan or, if Defendants decline to accept one or more of CSPA’s 24 comments, provide CSPA with a written explanation of the grounds for rejection on or before the end of 25 the thirty (30) day period. Disputes regarding the adequacy of a particular BMP shall not impact the 26 schedule for implementing any other BMP set forth in the Action Plan, except to the extent an 27 undisputed BMP is related to a disputed BMP. Any disputes as to the adequacy of the Action Plan shall 28 be resolved pursuant to the dispute resolution provisions of this Consent Decree, set out in Section III [Proposed] Consent Decree 11 Civil Case No. 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD 1 below. 2 22. Defendants shall contact Plaintiff to request an extension of any deadline set forth in this 3 Consent Decree, if necessary, to implement any structural BMPs requiring agency approval. Plaintiff’s 4 consent to Defendants’ requested extension shall not be unreasonably withheld. 5 Defendants shall revise their SWPPP and Monitoring & Reporting Plan (“M&RP”) as 23. 6 applicable within thirty (30) days to reflect the changes required by an Action Plan. Defendants shall 7 notify CSPA in writing when the Action Plan has been completely implemented. 8 9 D. Storm Water Sampling. 24. Sampling. During the life of this Consent Decree, Defendants agree to collect storm water 10 samples from each location where storm water is discharged from the Facility from at least four (4) 11 qualifying rain events per Wet Season. All sampling shall be conducted as described in subparagraphs a. 12 through j. 13 14 a. For purposes of this Consent Decree, a qualifying rain event is one that produces a discharge and is preceded by forty-eight (48) hours without a discharge. 15 b. Defendants shall sample within four (4) hours of: (1) the start of discharge, or (2) the 16 start of Facility operations if the qualifying rain event (as identified in (a), above) occurs within the 17 previous twelve (12) hour period. Nothing herein shall be construed to require Defendants to collect 18 storm water samples outside of the Facility’s normal hours of operation. 19 c. If, prior to March 1 of a Wet Season, Defendants have been unable to collect samples 20 from two (2) qualifying rain events, Defendants shall satisfy the sampling requirements of this Consent 21 Decree by sampling non-qualifying rain events, but shall still endeavor to collect samples from a 22 qualifying rain event. 23 d. Defendants agree to collect storm water samples from other discharge point(s) at the 24 Facility that are created due to a change in operation or other circumstances, or are otherwise required to 25 be sampled by the Storm Water Permit, the New Storm Water Permit, or this Consent Decree. 26 27 28 e. Defendants shall analyze each storm water sample for the contaminants set forth in f. A laboratory accredited by the State of California shall analyze all samples collected Table 1. [Proposed] Consent Decree 12 Civil Case No. 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD 1 pursuant to this Consent Decree. 2 3 g. contaminants at or below the values specified in Table 1. 4 5 h. i. 10 11 Defendants shall request that sample-analysis results be reported to it within ten (10) business days of laboratory receipt of the sample. 8 9 All samples collected from the Facility shall be delivered to the laboratory as necessary to ensure that sample “hold time” is not exceeded. 6 7 The laboratory shall use analytical methods adequate to detect the individual j. Defendants shall provide CSPA with the lab results, including a copy of the complete laboratory report of all samples collected at the Facility, within five (5) business days of receiving the results. E. 12 Visual Observations. 25. All BMPs shall be visually inspected at least weekly and after significant rain events. In 13 addition, all visual observations of storm water discharges shall be conducted in accordance with the 14 terms of the Storm Water Permit and this Consent Decree. During the life of this Consent Decree, 15 Defendants shall continue to conduct Daily Rain Checks at the Facility, documenting any rain events 16 that occur during working hours, including any associated discharge. Defendants shall maintain logs of 17 the Daily Rain Checks, which shall be included in Defendants’ Annual Reports submitted to the 18 Regional Board, and within ten (10) days of receipt of Plaintiff’s written request. 19 20 F. Employee Training. 26. Within sixty (60) days of the Effective Date, Defendants shall conduct additional 21 employee training in order to familiarize employees at the Facility as appropriate with the requirements 22 of the Storm Water Permit and this Consent Decree. The training program shall include use of written 23 training materials needed for effective implementation of the training program. Defendants shall also 24 ensure that there are a sufficient number of employees assigned to implement the BMPs and conduct 25 other compliance activities required by the Storm Water Permit and this Consent Decree, and that these 26 employees are properly trained to perform the required activities. 27 28 27. The training program shall require at least the following: a. Non-Storm Water Discharge Training. The Defendants shall continue to train [Proposed] Consent Decree 13 Civil Case No. 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD 1 employees, as appropriate to their particular job descriptions, on the Storm Water Permit’s prohibition of 2 non-storm water discharges, so that employees know what non-storm water discharges are, which can 3 result from improper draining of automobile fluids, and how to detect and prevent them; 4 b. BMP Training. The Defendants shall continue to train employees, as appropriate to 5 their particular job descriptions, on BMP implementation and maintenance to ensure that BMPs are 6 implemented effectively to prevent or minimize the exposure of pollutants to storm water, to prevent or 7 minimize the discharge of contaminated storm water, and to ensure the proper treatment of storm water 8 at the Facility; 9 c. Sampling Training. The Defendants shall designate an adequate number of employees 10 to ensure the collection of storm water samples from each discharge location as required by this Consent 11 Decree and/or the Storm Water Permit. The training shall continue to include the proper sampling 12 protocols, including chain of custody requirements, to ensure storm water samples are properly 13 collected, stored, and submitted to a certified laboratory. 14 d. Visual Observation Training. The Defendants shall provide training to all individuals 15 performing visual observations at the Facility pursuant to this Consent Decree and/or the Storm Water 16 Permit. 17 28. Training shall continue to be provided on an annual basis, or as otherwise required to 18 ensure compliance with the terms of this Consent Decree, by a private consultant or a representative of 19 Defendants who is familiar with the requirements of this Consent Decree and the Storm Water Permit. 20 The training shall be repeated as necessary to ensure that employees are familiar with the requirements 21 of this Consent Decree, the Storm Water Permit, and the Facility’s SWPPP and M&RP, as appropriate 22 to the particular employee’s job descriptions. Any new employee who is responsible for implementation 23 of any portion of the SWPPP, the M&RP, or compliance with other terms of the Storm Water Permit or 24 Consent Decree shall receive training within thirty (30) days after being hired or before being 25 responsible for compliance with the terms of the Storm Water Permit or Consent Decree. 26 29. The Defendants shall maintain training records to document compliance with Section II.F 27 of this Consent Decree, and shall make these records available for Plaintiff’s review at the Facility. The 28 Training Program shall be specified in the SWPPP and Defendants shall modify the SWPPP as [Proposed] Consent Decree 14 Civil Case No. 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD 1 2 3 4 necessary to reflect the training program required by this Consent Decree. G. Storm Water Pollution Prevention and Monitoring and Reporting Plans. 30. Within sixty (60) days after the Effective Date of this Consent Decree, Defendants shall further revise their SWPPP and their M&RP to the extent necessary to: 5 a. Include current BMPs; 6 b. Incorporate the requirements of the Storm Water Permit and this Consent Decree; 7 c. Incorporate BMPs identified and developed pursuant to this Consent Decree; 8 d. Include information contained in other documents that the SWPPP and/or M&RP refer 9 to, such as CADG documents, as appendices to the SWPPP and/or M&RP; 10 e. Identify the individuals responsible for compliance with the Storm Water Permit and 11 this Consent Decree including specifying which position or job description is responsible for what area 12 of compliance (e.g., Store Manager, collecting samples); 13 14 f. all information required by the Storm Water Permit and this Consent Decree; 15 16 g. Identification of specific pollutant(s) associated with each industrial activity and/or pollutant source, and BMPs for each potential pollutant source; 17 18 Include a site map that includes at a minimum current conditions at the Facility, and h. Description of specific maintenance of structural BMPs such as maintenance on the filtration system, secondary containment, and berms. 19 i. Include, and modify as applicable, Defendants’ visual inspection checklist that will be 20 used by trained Facility personnel when conducting the visual observations and monitoring of storm 21 water required under the Storm Water Permit and this Consent Decree. 22 j. Include the Storm Water Permit’s sampling and monitoring requirements including 23 but not limited to the Facility’s sample locations, and sample analysis for all applicable pollutants 24 including at a minimum those listed in Table 1. 25 31. Commenting on the SWPPP and M&RP Revisions. Defendants shall submit the revised 26 SWPPP and M&RP to CSPA for review and comment as soon as it is completed but in any event no 27 later than sixty (60) days after the Effective Date. CSPA shall provide comments, if any, to Defendants 28 within thirty (30) days of receipt of the SWPPP and M&RP. Within thirty (30) days after receipt of [Proposed] Consent Decree 15 Civil Case No. 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD 1 comments from CSPA, Defendants shall incorporate CSPA’s comments into the SWPPP and M&RP or 2 shall justify in writing why any comment is not incorporated. Any disputes over the adequacy of the 3 revised SWPPP and M&RP shall be resolved pursuant to the dispute resolution provisions of this 4 Consent Decree, set out in Section III below. 5 32. Additional Revisions to SWPPP and M&RP. Defendants shall revise the SWPPP and 6 M&RP if there are any changes in the Facility’s operations that may possibly affect the quality of storm 7 water discharges at the Facility, including but not limited to changes to storm water discharge point(s) or 8 changes or additions to the BMPs at the Facility resulting from an Action Plan. Defendants shall submit 9 any revised SWPPP and M&RP to CSPA for review and comment within five (5) days of completion. 10 CSPA shall provide comments, if any, to Defendants within thirty (30) days of receipt of any revised 11 SWPPP and M&RP. Within thirty (30) days of receiving comments from CSPA, Defendants shall 12 incorporate CSPA’s comments into any revised SWPPP and M&RP or shall justify in writing why any 13 comment is not incorporated. Any disputes as to the adequacy of the SWPPP and M&RP shall be 14 resolved pursuant to the dispute resolution provisions of this Consent Decree, set out in Section III 15 below. 16 17 H. 33. Compliance Monitoring and Reporting Site Inspections. Each year during the life of this Consent Decree, Plaintiff and its 18 representatives may conduct up to two (2) site inspections at the Facility, plus an additional inspection if 19 there is a dispute regarding compliance with the terms of this Consent Decree. The site inspections shall 20 occur during normal business hours, and Plaintiff shall provide Defendants with three (3) business days 21 advance notice of an intended inspection during the dry season, and at least forty-eight (48) hours 22 advance notice for a Wet Season inspection. Plaintiff agrees that during inspections, Plaintiff’s 23 representatives will wear safety goggles, hard hats, ear plugs and vests, which will be provided by 24 Defendants. Plaintiff also agrees to wear appropriate clothing and footwear, and remain in the presence 25 of PNP representatives at all times. If Plaintiff seeks to enter a portion of the Facility that Defendants 26 deem unsafe, the Settling Parties will discuss Defendants’ concern in an attempt to resolve the concern 27 so the inspection can continue. If the Settling Parties cannot resolve Defendants’ concern, any disputes 28 regarding the conduct of an inspection shall be resolved pursuant to the dispute resolution provisions of [Proposed] Consent Decree 16 Civil Case No. 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD 1 this Consent Decree, set out in Section III below. In addition, if Plaintiff discloses any information to the 2 public that was collected during the inspection, including observations, notes, analytical data or other 3 information, all such information shall be shared with Defendants at the same time it is made available 4 to the public. 5 34. During the site inspection, Plaintiff and/or its representatives shall be allowed access to 6 the Facility’s SWPPP, M&RP, and other monitoring records, reports, and sampling data pertaining to 7 storm water, and/or compliance with this Consent Decree, for the Facility. In addition, during the site 8 inspection, Plaintiff and/or its representatives may collect samples of discharges from the Facility in the 9 presence of Defendants or their representatives. Any samples collected by Plaintiff shall be submitted to 10 a certified California laboratory for analysis in accordance with the provisions of Paragraph 24 of this 11 Consent Decree. Copies of the complete laboratory reports shall be provided to Defendants within five 12 (5) business days of receipt. At the request of Defendants, Plaintiff shall, if sufficient flow is available, 13 provide Defendants with duplicate samples of any samples collected by Plaintiff, provided that nothing 14 herein shall require Defendants to submit such samples for analysis. If Defendants request duplicate 15 samples, they shall provide the necessary sample container(s) to Plaintiff for this purpose. If Defendants 16 elect to analyze the duplicate samples, the analyses shall be conducted in accordance with the 17 requirements of Paragraph 24, and a copy of the final laboratory report shall be provided to Plaintiff 18 with five (5) business days of receipt of the results. 19 35. Compliance Monitoring and Oversight. Defendants shall pay Plaintiff the sum of Four 20 Thousand Dollars ($4,000.00) per year (totaling $8,000.00) during the term of the Consent Decree to 21 help defray Plaintiff’s costs of monitoring and overseeing Defendants’ compliance with this Consent 22 Decree. Payment of Four Thousand Dollars ($4,000.00) shall be made within ten (10) days after the 23 Effective Date, and Four Thousand Dollars ($4,000.00) on the first anniversary of the Effective Date. 24 Defendants’ checks shall be made payable to: “Lawyers for Clean Water Attorney Client Trust 25 Account” and shall be delivered by certified mail or overnight delivery to: Lawyers for Clean Water, 26 Inc., 1004-A O’Reilly Avenue, San Francisco, California 94129. 27 28 36. Action Plan Payments. If Defendants are required to submit an Action Plan to CSPA in accordance with Paragraph 19, Defendants shall make Action Plan payments payable to: “Lawyers for [Proposed] Consent Decree 17 Civil Case No. 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD 1 Clean Water Attorney Client Trust Account” and shall deliver such payments by certified mail or 2 overnight delivery to: Lawyers for Clean Water, Inc., 1004-A O’Reilly Avenue, San Francisco, 3 California 94129 at the time the Action Plan is submitted to CSPA. The Action Plan payments shall be 4 made as follows: 5 a. Limited Action Plan Payment. In circumstances where there are no more than two (2) 6 contaminants exceeding Table 1 numeric values in no more than a single rain event in a Wet Season, 7 and sampling was conducted as required by this Consent Decree and the Storm Water Permit, 8 Defendants shall make an additional initial compliance monitoring payment in the amount of Five 9 Hundred Dollars ($500.00) upon submission of the Action Plan. For example, if copper and zinc were 10 the only parameters exceeded for the entire Wet Season and were exceeded only once, then payment 11 under this subsection will be made. If zinc and copper were each exceeded in one sample event, and zinc 12 was exceeded during a second sample event, payment will be made under subsection b. below. 13 b. Regular Action Plan Payment. In all other circumstances, Defendants shall make an 14 initial additional compliance monitoring payment in the amount of One Thousand Five Hundred Dollars 15 ($1,500.00) upon submission of the Action Plan. 16 c. Thereafter, in the event that the initial payment is insufficient to cover the cost of CSPA’s 17 review of the Action Plan, Defendants agree to reimburse CSPA its additional costs, up to a maximum 18 of One Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($1,500.00), for a total Action Plan payment of Three Thousand 19 Dollars ($3,000.00) for any single Action Plan. Plaintiff shall submit an invoice to Defendants 20 documenting its additional costs, which shall be paid within thirty (30) days of receipt in accordance 21 with the provisions of this paragraph. 22 37. Reporting and Document Provision. During the life of this Consent Decree, Defendants 23 shall copy Plaintiff on all documents related to water quality at the Facility that are submitted to the 24 Regional Board, the State Board, and/or any State or local agency or municipality. Such reports and 25 documents shall be provided to Plaintiff concurrently as they are sent to the agencies and/or 26 municipalities. Any correspondence related to Defendants’ compliance with the Storm Water Permit or 27 storm water quality received by Defendants from any regulatory agency, State or local agency, county or 28 municipality shall be provided to CSPA within five (5) business days of receipt by Defendants. [Proposed] Consent Decree 18 Civil Case No. 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD 1 I. 2 38. Environmental Project, Litigation Fees and Costs, and Stipulated Penalties Environmental Mitigation Project. To remediate environmental harms as alleged in the 3 Complaint, Defendants shall pay Thirty Five Thousand Dollars ($35,000.00) to be used to fund 4 environmental project activities that will benefit the Sacramento River watershed, and, to the extent 5 possible, with an emphasis on its tributaries such as Antelope Creek (“the Mitigation Payment”). The 6 Mitigation Payment shall be paid to the Rose Foundation for Communities and the Environment, 6008 7 College Avenue, Suite 10, Oakland, California 94618 attention Tim Little. The Mitigation Payment shall 8 be made within sixty (60) days of the Effective Date of this Consent Decree, and Defendants shall 9 concurrently provide Plaintiff with a copy of such payment. Plaintiff shall coordinate with the Rose 10 Foundation to provide DOJ with the information set out in Paragraph 5 of the Notification on Receipt of 11 a Clean Air Act or Clean Water Act Citizen Suit Complaint (“Notification”) (DOJ, Environment and 12 Natural Resources Division, February 2012), attached hereto as Exhibit B. Plaintiff shall inform the 13 Rose Foundation that it is required to copy Defendants on any reporting to DOJ regarding the 14 disbursement of the Mitigation Payment. No portion of the Mitigation Payment may be made to 15 Plaintiff. 16 39. CSPA’s Fees and Costs. Defendants agree to reimburse CSPA for its investigation fees 17 and costs, expert/consultant fees and costs, reasonable attorneys’ fees, and other costs incurred as a 18 result of investigating and preparing this lawsuit, and negotiating a resolution of this matter, in an 19 amount totaling Sixty-Six Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($66,500.00), which amount shall be paid in 20 full for Lawyers for Clean Water’s fees and costs, and any experts that were retained in connection with 21 this matter. Such payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date, payable to: 22 “Lawyers for Clean Water Attorney Client Trust Account” and delivered by certified mail or overnight 23 delivery to: Lawyers for Clean Water, Inc., 1004-A O’Reilly Avenue, San Francisco, California 94129. 24 40. Stipulated Payment. The Defendants shall make a stipulated payment of One Thousand 25 Dollars ($1,000.00) for each missed deadline included in this Consent Decree. Payments for a missed 26 deadline shall be made to fund environmental project activities that will benefit the Rocklin-San Joaquin 27 River Delta and its watershed and shall be made to the Rose Foundation to the address listed above. The 28 Defendants agree to make the stipulated payment within thirty (30) days of a missed deadline. [Proposed] Consent Decree 19 Civil Case No. 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD 1 Defendants shall provide Plaintiff with a copy of each such payment at the time it is made. 2 41. Interest Payments. In the event of late payment of any of the sums due to Plaintiff under 3 this Consent Decree, the Defendants shall pay ten-percent (10%) APR interest to Plaintiff, which shall 4 accrue from the first day past the date the sum was due until the date the Defendants tender payment. All 5 such payments shall be made payable to: “Lawyers for Clean Water Attorney Client Trust Account” and 6 delivered by certified mail or overnight delivery to: Lawyers for Clean Water, Inc., 1004-A O’Reilly 7 Avenue, San Francisco, California 94129. 8 III. 9 DISPUTE RESOLUTION 42. This Court shall retain jurisdiction over this matter until the Consent Decree terminates in 10 accordance with Paragraph 8 for the purposes of implementing and enforcing the terms and conditions 11 of this Consent Decree, and adjudicating all disputes among the Settling Parties that may arise under the 12 provisions of this Consent Decree. The Court shall have the power to enforce this Consent Decree with 13 all available legal and equitable remedies, including contempt. 14 43. Meet and Confer. A Settling Party to this Consent Decree shall invoke the dispute 15 resolution procedures of this Section by notifying all other Settling Parties in writing of the matter(s) in 16 dispute. The Settling Parties shall then meet and confer in good faith (either telephonically or in person) 17 in an attempt to resolve the dispute informally over a period of twenty (20) calendar days from the date 18 of the notice. 19 44. If the Settling Parties cannot resolve a dispute by the end of meet and confer informal 20 negotiations, the party initiating the dispute resolution provision may invoke formal dispute resolution 21 by filing a motion before the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. The 22 Settling Parties agree not to object to an expedited hearing schedule on the motion if one of the Settling 23 Parties requests one. 24 45. Burden of Proof. In the event of any disagreement or dispute between Plaintiff and 25 Defendants over the necessity or appropriateness of implementing any particular BMP or set of BMPs, 26 including in any formal or informal proceeding brought to enforce the terms of this Consent Decree, 27 Defendants shall bear the burden of demonstrating that its BMPs, collectively, constitute BAT/BCT for 28 the Facility, or that they are in compliance with the terms of this Consent Decree. Plaintiff shall not be [Proposed] Consent Decree 20 Civil Case No. 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD 1 required to prove that Defendants’ BMPs do not constitute BAT/BCT. 2 46. Litigation costs and fees incurred in conducting meet and confer or otherwise addressing 3 and/or resolving any dispute, including an alleged breach of this Consent Decree, shall be awarded in 4 accord with the standard established by Section 505 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1365, and case 5 law interpreting that standard. 6 IV. 7 MUTUAL RELEASE OF LIABILITY AND COVENANT NOT TO SUE 47. CSPA’s Release. Upon the Effective Date of this Consent Decree, CSPA, on its own 8 behalf and on behalf of its current and former officers, directors, employees, subsidiaries, and affiliates, 9 and each of their successors and assigns, and its agents, attorneys, and other representatives releases all 10 persons including, without limitation, Defendants and each of their current and former officers, 11 directors, members, employees, shareholders and each of their predecessors, successors and assigns, and 12 each of their agents, attorneys, consultants, and other representatives from, and waives all claims which 13 arise from or pertain to this action, including all claims for injunctive relief, damages, penalties, fines, 14 sanctions, mitigation, fees (including fees of attorneys, experts, and others), costs, expenses or any other 15 sum incurred or claimed, and/or claims that were asserted in CSPA’s Notice Letter and Complaint up to 16 the Effective Date. 17 48. Defendants' Release. Upon the Effective Date of this Consent Decree, Defendants, on 18 each of their own behalves and on behalf of their current and former officers, directors, employees, 19 members, and each of their successors and assigns, and their agents, attorneys, and other representatives 20 releases CSPA (and its current and former officers, directors, employees, members, parents, subsidiaries, 21 and affiliates, and each of their successors and assigns, and its agents, attorneys, and other 22 representatives) from, and waives all claims which arise from or pertain to this action, including all 23 claims for fees (including fees of attorneys, experts, and others), costs, expenses or any other sum 24 incurred or claimed or which could have been claimed for matters associated with or related to CSPA’s 25 Notice Letter and Complaint up to the Effective Date. 26 49. Nothing in this Consent Decree limits or otherwise affects CSPA’s right to address or 27 take any position that it deems necessary or appropriate in any formal or informal proceeding before the 28 Regional Board, EPA, or any other judicial or administrative body on any other matter relating to storm [Proposed] Consent Decree 21 Civil Case No. 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD 1 water discharges from the Facility occurring or arising after the Effective Date of the Consent Decree 2 but specifically excluding the discharges and all other matters addressed by this Consent Decree. 3 V. 4 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 50. No Admission of Liability. Neither this Consent Decree, the implementation of additional 5 BMPs, nor any payment pursuant to the Consent Decree shall constitute or be construed as a finding, 6 adjudication, admission or acknowledgment of any fact, law, or liability, nor shall it be construed as an 7 admission of violation of any law, rule, or regulation. Defendants maintain and reserve all defenses they 8 may have to any alleged violations that may be raised in the future. 9 51. Force Majeure. Force Majeure includes any act of God, war, fire, earthquake, windstorm, 10 flood or natural catastrophe; civil disturbance, vandalism, sabotage or terrorism; restraint by court order 11 or public authority or agency; or action or non-action by, or inability to obtain the necessary 12 authorizations or approvals from any governmental agency. Force Majeure shall not include normal 13 inclement weather, economic hardship, or inability to pay. Any Settling Party seeking to rely upon this 14 paragraph to excuse or postpone performance, shall have the burden of establishing that it could not 15 reasonably have been expected to avoid the force majeure event and which by exercise of due diligence 16 has been unable to overcome the failure of performance. The Settling Parties shall exercise due diligence 17 to resolve and remove any force majeure event. 18 52. Construction. The language in all parts of this Consent Decree shall be construed 19 according to its plain and ordinary meaning, except as to those terms defined in the Storm Water Permit, 20 the Clean Water Act, or specifically herein. 21 53. Choice of Law. The laws of the United States shall govern this Consent Decree. 22 54. Severability. In the event that any provision, paragraph, section, or sentence of this 23 Consent Decree is held by a court to be unenforceable, the validity of the enforceable provisions shall 24 not be adversely affected. 25 55. Correspondence. All notices required herein or any other correspondence pertaining to 26 this Consent Decree shall be sent by overnight mail or courier or by electronic mail, with request for 27 confirmation receipt, as follows: If to Plaintiff: 28 [Proposed] Consent Decree 22 Civil Case No. 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Layne Friedrich Layne@lawyersforcleanwater.com Drevet Hunt Drev@lawyersforcleanwater.com Lawyers for Clean Water, Inc. 1004-A O’Reilly Avenue San Francisco, California 94129 With copies to: Bill Jennings, Executive Director Deltakeep@me.com California Sportfishing Protection Alliance 3536 Rainier Avenue Stockton, California 95204 If to Defendants: Margaret Rosegay margaret.rosegay@pillsburylaw.com Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP Four Embarcadero Center, 22nd Floor San Francisco, California 94111 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 With copies to: Charina Gaspay cgaspay@picknpull.com Pick-n-Pull EHS Department 10850 Gold Center Drive, Suite 325 Rancho Cordova, California 95670 Michael Brinkley mbrinkley@picknpull.com Pick-N-Pull Auto Dismantlers 10850 Gold Center Drive, Suite 325 Rancho Cordova, California 95670 Notifications of communications shall be deemed submitted the next business day after having 22 been deposited with an overnight mail/delivery service. Any change of address or addresses shall be 23 communicated in the manner described above for giving notices. In addition, the Settling Parties may 24 agree to transmit documents electronically or by facsimile. 25 56. Effect of Consent Decree. Except as provided herein, Plaintiff does not, by its consent to 26 this Consent Decree, warrant or aver in any manner that Defendants’ compliance with this Consent 27 Decree will constitute or result in compliance with any Federal or State law or regulation. Nothing in 28 this Consent Decree shall be construed to affect or limit in any way the obligation of Defendants to [Proposed] Consent Decree 23 Civil Case No. 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD 1 comply with all Federal, State, and local laws and regulations governing any activity required by this 2 Consent Decree. 3 57. Counterparts. This Consent Decree may be executed in any number of counterparts, all of 4 which together shall constitute one original document. Telecopy, email of a .pdf signature and/or 5 facsimile copies of original signature shall be deemed to be originally executed counterparts of this 6 Consent Decree. 7 58. Modification of the Consent Decree. This Consent Decree, and any provisions herein, 8 may not be changed, waived, discharged, or terminated unless by a written instrument, signed by the 9 Settling Parties. 10 59. Dismissal of Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc. Following entry of this Consent Decree by 11 this Court, Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc. shall be dismissed from this litigation with prejudice, and 12 shall not be considered a Settling Party or otherwise bound by the terms of this Consent Decree. 13 60. Full Settlement. This Consent Decree constitutes a full and final settlement of this matter. 14 61. Integration Clause. This is an integrated Consent Decree. This Consent Decree is 15 intended to be a full and complete statement of the terms of the agreement between the Settling Parties 16 and expressly supersedes any and all prior oral or written agreements covenants, representations, and 17 warranties (express or implied) concerning the subject matter of this Consent Decree. 18 62. Authority. The undersigned representatives for Plaintiff and Defendants each certify that 19 he/she is fully authorized by the party whom he/she represents to enter into the terms and conditions of 20 this Consent Decree. 21 63. The provisions of this Consent Decree apply to and bind the Settling Parties, including 22 any successors or assigns. The Settling Parties certify that their undersigned representatives are fully 23 authorized to enter into this Consent Decree, to execute it on behalf of the Settling Parties, and to legally 24 bind the Settling Parties to its terms. 25 64. The Settling Parties agree to be bound by this Consent Decree and not to contest its 26 validity in any subsequent proceeding to implement or enforce its terms. By entering into this Consent 27 Decree, the Defendants do not admit liability for any purpose as to any allegation or matter arising out 28 of this Action. [Proposed] Consent Decree 24 Civil Case No. 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD 1 2 3 4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Consent Decree as of the date first set forth above. IT IS SO ORDERED: Dated: November 25, 2014 5 6 7 8 APPROVED AS TO FORM LAWYERS FOR CLEAN WATER, INC. Dated: _____________2014 By: ___________________________ Layne Friedrich Attorney for Plaintiff 9 10 11 12 PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP 13 14 Dated: _____________2014 15 16 By: ___________________________ Margaret Rosegay Attorney for Defendants APPROVED AS TO CONTENT 17 18 Dated: _____________2014 19 By: ___________________________ Bill Jennings California Sportfishing Protection Alliance 20 21 Dated: _____________2014 By: ___________________________ Michael Brinkley Pick and Pull Auto Dismantling, Inc. Dated: _____________2014 22 By: ___________________________ Michael Brinkley Norprop, Inc. Dated: _____________2014 By: ___________________________ Michael Brinkley 23 24 25 26 27 28 [Proposed] Consent Decree 25 Civil Case No. 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD Pick-N-Pull Auto Dismantlers 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [Proposed] Consent Decree 26 Civil Case No. 2:14-cv-01284-GEB-DAD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?