White v. Sacramento Public Defenders Office, et al.

Filing 14

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/14/15 ORDERING The findings and recommendations filed October 2, 2014, are adopted in full; and This action is dismissed without leave to amend for failure to state a claim.(Becknal, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

LLOYD WHITE,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:14-cv-1289 TLN AC P
Plaintiff,

v.

ORDER

SACRAMENTO PUBLIC DEFENDER’S
OFFICE, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On October 2, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
21
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 10. Plaintiff
23
was granted a sixty-day extension of time to file objections to the findings and recommendations.
24
ECF No. 13. Plaintiff has failed to do so.
25
The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
26

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

27
ORDERED that:
28
1

1

1. The findings and recommendations filed October 2, 2014, are adopted in full; and

2

2. This action is dismissed without leave to amend for failure to state a claim.

3
4

Dated: January 14, 2015

5
6
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2