White v. Sacramento Public Defenders Office, et al.
Filing
14
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/14/15 ORDERING The findings and recommendations filed October 2, 2014, are adopted in full; and This action is dismissed without leave to amend for failure to state a claim.(Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LLOYD WHITE,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:14-cv-1289 TLN AC P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
SACRAMENTO PUBLIC DEFENDER’S
OFFICE, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On October 2, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
21
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 10. Plaintiff
23
was granted a sixty-day extension of time to file objections to the findings and recommendations.
24
ECF No. 13. Plaintiff has failed to do so.
25
The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
26
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
27
ORDERED that:
28
1
1
1. The findings and recommendations filed October 2, 2014, are adopted in full; and
2
2. This action is dismissed without leave to amend for failure to state a claim.
3
4
Dated: January 14, 2015
5
6
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?