White v. Morlan, et al.

Filing 13

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/17/14 ordering this action is dismissed with prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

LLOYD WHITE,

11
12
13
14

No. 2:14-cv-1290 AC P
Plaintiff,

v.

ORDER

OFFICER DANIEL MORLAN, et al.,
Defendants.

15
16

Plaintiff filed this action pro se pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 while a county inmate, then

17

became a state prisoner. Plaintiff has consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned in this

18

matter. ECF No. 5. By order filed October 3, 2014, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed with

19

twenty-eight days leave granted to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 9. In that order, the

20

court informed plaintiff of the deficiencies of his complaint. Id. Plaintiff was cautioned that

21

failure to file an amended complaint would result in dismissal of this action. Id. The twenty-

22

eight day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise

23

responded to the court’s order.

24

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice. See

25

Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

26

DATED: December 17, 2014

27
28