Armstrong v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 21

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/26/15 ORDERING that Within fourteen (14) days of this order, the Commissioner shall show cause in writing why monetary sanctions in the amount of $150.00 should not be imposed based on the Commissioner's failure to comply with court deadlines. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WENDY SUSAN ARMSTRONG, 12 13 14 15 16 No. 2:14-cv-1305-MCE-KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. 17 18 On December 10, 2014, plaintiff filed her opening motion for summary judgment. (ECF 19 No. 16.) Since then, the Commissioner has already been granted two extensions to file a cross- 20 motion for summary judgment, with the cross-motion for summary judgment presently due on 21 March 12, 2015. (ECF Nos. 18, 20.) Although that deadline has long passed, the court’s records 22 show that the Commissioner has failed to file a cross-motion for summary judgment; nor has the 23 Commissioner requested any further extension of time. 24 The court expects the Commissioner’s counsel, like all litigants, to strictly comply with 25 court deadlines. The court is not unsympathetic to the large volume of cases handled by both 26 counsel for plaintiff and the Commissioner, and thus liberally grants extensions when appropriate. 27 However, if an extension of time is necessary, such an extension should be sought in advance of 28 expiration of the filing deadline and must be supported by good cause. 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. Within fourteen (14) days of this order, the Commissioner shall show cause in writing 3 why monetary sanctions in the amount of $150.00 should not be imposed based on 4 the Commissioner’s failure to comply with court deadlines. If counsel concludes that 5 he is unable to show good cause, he may pay the monetary sanctions in lieu of filing a 6 written response. 7 2. Within fourteen (14) days of this order, the Commissioner shall file its cross-motion 8 for summary judgment. No further extensions of time will be granted. If current 9 counsel finds himself unable to comply with that deadline, he should promptly 10 consider reassignment of the case to another attorney for the Commissioner. Failure 11 to timely file the cross-motion for summary judgment will be deemed the 12 Commissioner’s consent to a summary grant of plaintiff’s motion for summary 13 judgment. 14 15 16 3. Plaintiff may, but need not, file a reply brief within 21 days after the filing of any cross-motion for summary judgment. 4. Thereafter, the motion will be submitted for decision without oral argument on the 17 record and written briefing, unless the court subsequently determines that further 18 briefing or oral argument is necessary. 19 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 26, 2015 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?