Johnson v. Meyer et al
Filing
5
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 6/20/14. Defendants response to the complaint is due by 7/17/14. (Manzer, C)
1
2
3
4
CRIS C. VAUGHAN, SBN 99568
VAUGHAN & ASSOCIATES
6207 South Walnut Street, Suite 800
Loomis, CA 95650
Telephone: 916-660-9401
Facsimile: 916-660-9378
5
Attorneys for Defendant, Karin T. Meyer
6
10
Phyl Grace, Esq., SBN 171771
CENTER FOR DISABILITY ACCESS
P. O. Box 262490
San Diego, CA 92196-2490
Telephone: 858-375-7385
Facsimile: 888-422-5191
11
Attorneys for Plaintiff, Scott Johnson
7
8
9
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
15
18
STIPULATION RE: EXTENSION OF TIME
UNTIL JULY 17, 2014 FOR DEFENDANT
TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Plaintiff,
16
17
Case No. 2:14-cv-01319-GEB-DAD
Scott Johnson,
v.
Karin T. Meyer; Robert Edward Lee; and
Does 1-10,
19
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
Pursuant to Local Rule 144, Plaintiff, Scott Johnson, and Defendant, Karin T.
Meyer, by and through their respective counsel stipulate as follows:
1.
The Defendant has not previously requested an extension of time to
respond to the Complaint;
-1STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
2:14-cv-013107-GEB-DAD
1
2
3
4
2.
The parties stipulate that Defendant has requested an extension until July
17, 2014 to respond or otherwise plead;
3.
The parties stipulate to Defendant’s request for an extension until July 17,
2014 to respond or otherwise plead;
5
4.
Defendant’s response will be due no later than July 17, 2014;
6
5.
All other dates previously set by the Court will remain in effect.
7
IT IS SO STIPULATED effective as of June 18, 2014.
8
9
Dated: June 18, 2014
/s/ Cris C. Vaughan
CRIS C. VAUGHAN
Attorney for Defendant,
Ronald C. Kraushar
Dated: June 18, 2014
__/s/ Phyl Grace_____
PHYL GRACE
Attorney for Plaintiff,
Scott Johnson
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
[PROPOSED] ORDER
17
18
19
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 20, 2014
20
21
22
23
24
25
-2STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
2:14-cv-013107-GEB-DAD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?