Irwin v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 15

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/23/14. Defendant shall have until 2/6/15 to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. (Manzer, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 TERESA IRWIN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) CAROLYN COLVIN, ) Acting Commissioner of Social Security ) ) ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________ ) Case No. 2:14-cv-01332-AC STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; ORDER 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Stipulation for Extension of Time and Order Case no. 2:14-cv-01332-AC 28 1 1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties through their respective 2 counsel of record, that Defendant shall have additional 30 days, up to and including February 6, 3 4 5 6 2015, to respond to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment. This is the first request by Defendant for an extension of time. This extension is requested to accommodate Defendant’s counsel’s pre-planned time off for the holidays along with counsel’s current heavy workload and briefing schedule. 7 Respectfully submitted, 8 9 Dated: December 22, 2014 LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE D. ROHLFING By: _/s/ Vijay J. Patel_____________ VIJAY J. PATEL Attorneys for Plaintiff [Authorization by e-mail on December 22, 2014] 10 11 12 13 Dated: December 22, 2014 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney DONNA L. CALVERT Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration 14 15 16 17 By: /s/ Sundeep R. Patel ___ SUNDEEP R. PATEL Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant 18 19 20 21 ORDER 22 Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 Dated December 23, 2014 25 26 27 Stipulation for Extension of Time and Order Case no. 2:14-cv-01332-AC 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?