Irwin v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
15
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/23/14. Defendant shall have until 2/6/15 to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. (Manzer, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
TERESA IRWIN,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
CAROLYN COLVIN,
)
Acting Commissioner of Social Security
)
)
)
)
Defendant.
)
__________________________________ )
Case No. 2:14-cv-01332-AC
STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND
TIME TO FILE DEFENDANT’S
CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT AND OPPOSITION
TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT;
ORDER
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Stipulation for Extension of Time and Order
Case no. 2:14-cv-01332-AC
28
1
1
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties through their respective
2
counsel of record, that Defendant shall have additional 30 days, up to and including February 6,
3
4
5
6
2015, to respond to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment.
This is the first request by Defendant for an extension of time.
This extension is
requested to accommodate Defendant’s counsel’s pre-planned time off for the holidays along
with counsel’s current heavy workload and briefing schedule.
7
Respectfully submitted,
8
9
Dated: December 22, 2014
LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE D. ROHLFING
By: _/s/ Vijay J. Patel_____________
VIJAY J. PATEL
Attorneys for Plaintiff
[Authorization by e-mail on December 22, 2014]
10
11
12
13
Dated: December 22, 2014
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
DONNA L. CALVERT
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
14
15
16
17
By: /s/ Sundeep R. Patel ___
SUNDEEP R. PATEL
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant
18
19
20
21
ORDER
22
Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
24
Dated December 23, 2014
25
26
27
Stipulation for Extension of Time and Order
Case no. 2:14-cv-01332-AC
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?