Johnson v. Thomas et al
Filing
24
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/7/16 ORDERING the Settlement Conference CONTINUED to 12/8/2016 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. (Jackson, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
CENTER FOR DISABILITY ACCESS
Raymond G. Ballister, Jr. SBN 111282
Phyl Grace, Esq., SBN 171771
Mail: PO Box 262490
San Diego, CA 92196-2490
Delivery: 9845 Erma Road, Suite 300
San Diego, CA 92131
(858) 375-7385; (888) 422-5191 fax
phylg@potterhandy.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff SCOTT JOHNSON
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
Scott Johnson,
Plaintiff,
11
12
v.
13
Kamal Thomas;
Lilly Thomas; and Does 1-10,
14
Case: 2:14-CV-01352-MCE-KJN
ORDER [proposed] GRANTING
JOINT REQUEST TO CONTINUE
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
Defendants.
15
16
17
18
19
20
Good cause having been shown, the Court hereby grants the parties’
request to continue the Settlement Conference. The Settlement Conference will
be held on December 8, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 8, 13th Floor.
The parties are directed to submit confidential settlement conference
21
statements via e-mail (efborders@caed.uscourts.gov) to chambers seven (7)
22
days prior to the settlement conference. Such statements are neither to be filed
23
with the clerk nor served on opposing counsel. However, each party shall e-file a
24
one page document entitled Notice of Submission of Confidential Settlement
25
Conference Statement. The parties may agree, or not, to serve each other with
26
the settlement statements.
27
28
Each party is reminded of the requirement that it be represented in person
at the settlement conference by a person able to dispose of the case or fully
Order
2:14-CV-01352-MCE-KJN
1
authorized to settle the matter at the settlement conference on any terms. See
2
Local Rule 270.
3
Dated: June 7, 2016
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Order
2:14-CV-01352-MCE-KJN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?