Johnson v. Thomas et al

Filing 24

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/7/16 ORDERING the Settlement Conference CONTINUED to 12/8/2016 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. (Jackson, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 CENTER FOR DISABILITY ACCESS Raymond G. Ballister, Jr. SBN 111282 Phyl Grace, Esq., SBN 171771 Mail: PO Box 262490 San Diego, CA 92196-2490 Delivery: 9845 Erma Road, Suite 300 San Diego, CA 92131 (858) 375-7385; (888) 422-5191 fax phylg@potterhandy.com Attorneys for Plaintiff SCOTT JOHNSON 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 Scott Johnson, Plaintiff, 11 12 v. 13 Kamal Thomas; Lilly Thomas; and Does 1-10, 14 Case: 2:14-CV-01352-MCE-KJN ORDER [proposed] GRANTING JOINT REQUEST TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE Defendants. 15 16 17 18 19 20 Good cause having been shown, the Court hereby grants the parties’ request to continue the Settlement Conference. The Settlement Conference will be held on December 8, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 8, 13th Floor. The parties are directed to submit confidential settlement conference 21 statements via e-mail (efborders@caed.uscourts.gov) to chambers seven (7) 22 days prior to the settlement conference. Such statements are neither to be filed 23 with the clerk nor served on opposing counsel. However, each party shall e-file a 24 one page document entitled Notice of Submission of Confidential Settlement 25 Conference Statement. The parties may agree, or not, to serve each other with 26 the settlement statements. 27 28 Each party is reminded of the requirement that it be represented in person at the settlement conference by a person able to dispose of the case or fully Order 2:14-CV-01352-MCE-KJN 1 authorized to settle the matter at the settlement conference on any terms. See 2 Local Rule 270. 3 Dated: June 7, 2016 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Order 2:14-CV-01352-MCE-KJN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?