Strong v. Collins

Filing 6

ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/30/14 ORDERING that the Clerk of the Court shall assign a district judge to this action; and it is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JOVAN STRONG,

12
13
14
15

No. 2: 14-cv-1366 KJN P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS

DEPUTY TOM COLLINS,
Defendant.

16
17

By an order filed June 20, 2014, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and return to the

18

court, within thirty days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on defendant. That

19

thirty day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any way to the court’s order.

20

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall assign a district

21
22
23
24

judge to this action; and
IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See
Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge

25

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

26

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

27

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Findings and

28

Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time
1

1

may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th

2

Cir. 1991).

3

Dated: July 30, 2014

4
5

Str1366.fusm

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2