Alturas Indian Rancheria v Jewell, et al

Filing 39

STIPULATION and ORDER for STAY signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/25/14. The parties hereby stipulate as follows: That the Court enter a stay of this matter; That the stay remain in effect until the Court is notified that BIA has offici ally recognized the lawful governing body of the tribe; That the stay shall dissolve 30 days after any party notifies the Court that BIA has taken such action; That any other party may object to dissolution of the stay within 14 days of such notic e, but only upon the grounds that BIA has not taken such action; That the parties shall file status reports with the Court every 180 days until such time as the matter is no longer stayed; and That the hearing currently set for December 11, 2014, on the motion for stay, be vacated. (Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney 2 GREGORY T. BRODERICK Assistant United States Attorney 3 501 I Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, CA 95814 4 Telephone: (916) 554-2780 Facsimile: (916) 554-2900 5 Attorneys for the United States 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ALTURAS INDIAN RANCHERIA Plaintiffs, 10 11 12 13 14 15 CASE NO. CASE 2:14-CV-01407-TLN-CMK STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR STAY v. SALLY JEWELL, Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior; KEVIN WASHBURN, Assistant Secretary of Indian Affairs; AMY DUTSCHKE, Pacific Regional Director, Bureau of Indian Affairs; TERE SALKELD, Pacific Regional Contracting Officer, Bureau of Indian Affairs Defendants. 16 17 18 The parties seek a stipulation from this Court staying the matter until disputes regarding the 19 government of Plaintiff Alturas Indian Rancheria are resolved. 20 Alturas filed this action on June 12, 2014, seeking an order compelling officials at the United 21 States Department of the Interior and the Bureau of Indian Affairs (“BIA”) to pay Contract Support 22 Costs under the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act, 25 U.S.C. § 450, et seq. 23 (“ISDEAA”). (Complaint, Dkt. No. 1. at ¶¶ 1 & 18).1 After the filing of Plaintiff’s motion for summary 24 judgment and Defendants’ motion to dismiss, a dispute arose as to who was the lawful governing body of 25 the tribe. Defendants then filed a motion to stay proceedings until that dispute was resolved. (See Dkt. 26 No. 37). Rather than litigate the issue of a stay, the parties have agreed to stay proceedings under the 27 1 28 As set forth in other filings, “Contract Support Costs” are payments by the federal government to the Tribe to administer various contracts for services to the Tribe. Stipulation and Order for Stay 30 1 1 terms and conditions set forth below. 2 Therefore, the parties hereby stipulate as follows: 3 1. That the Court enter a stay of this matter; 4 2. That the stay remain in effect until the Court is notified that BIA has officially recognized the 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 lawful governing body of the tribe; 3. That the stay shall dissolve 30 days after any party notifies the Court that BIA has taken such action; 4. That any other party may object to dissolution of the stay within 14 days of such notice, but only upon the grounds that BIA has not taken such action; 5. That the parties shall file status reports with the Court every 180 days until such time as the matter is no longer stayed; and 6. That the hearing currently set for December 11, 2014, on the motion for stay, be vacated. 13 Respectfully Submitted, 14 Dated: November 20, 2014 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney 15 /s/ Gregory T. Broderick GREGORY T. BRODERICK Assistant United States Attorney 16 17 18 Dated: November 20, 2014 /s/ Lester Marston (authorized Nov. 20, 2014) LESTER MARSTON Attorney for Plaintiff 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation and Order for Stay 30 2 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 Dated: November 25, 2014 3 4 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation and Order for Stay 30 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?