Sievers v. Bally Gaming, Inc

Filing 12

STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., on 9/4/14 ORDERING that the 9/15/2014 status (pretrial scheduling) conference is VACATED. All discovery shall be completed by 10/14/2015; Designation of Expert Witnesses d ue by 5/29/2015, and any rebuttal disclosures due by 7/1/2015; the last hearing date for a motion is 12/14/2015, commencing at 9:00 a.m.; the Final Pretrial Conference is set for 2/8/2016 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr.; Trial is set for 5/17/2016 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 Charles F. Sievers, Jr., 10 2:14-cv-01414-GEB-KJN Plaintiff, 11 12 No. v. STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER Bally Gaming, Inc., Defendant*. 13 14 15 16 The status (pretrial scheduling) conference scheduled 17 for hearing on September 15, 2014, is vacated since the parties’ 18 Joint Status Report filed on August 29, 2014 (“JSR”) indicates 19 the following Order should issue. DISMISSAL OF DOE DEFENDANTS 20 21 Since Plaintiff states in the JSR that he “does not 22 anticipate that any Doe Defendants will need to be joined as 23 additional parties[,]” Does 1-50 are dismissed. See Order Setting 24 Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference filed June 12, 2014, at 2 25 n.2 26 allegations not provided Doe defendants would be dismissed). (indicating that if justification for “Doe” defendant 27 * 28 The caption has been amended Defendants portion of this Order. according 1 to the Dismissal of Doe 1 SERVICE, JOINDER OF ADDITIONAL PARTIES, AMENDMENT 2 No further service, joinder of parties or amendments to 3 pleadings is permitted, except with leave of Court for good cause 4 shown. 5 DISCOVERY 6 All discovery shall be completed by October 14, 2015. 7 “Completed” means all discovery shall be conducted so that any 8 dispute 9 appropriate orders, if necessary, and, where discovery has been relative order discovery 10 ordered, 11 Each has party been shall have shall complied comply with been with on or resolved Federal before by prescribed “completion” date. 12 the to Rule of the Civil 13 Procedure 26(a)(2)(B) and (C)’s initial expert witness disclosure 14 requirements on or before May 29, 2015, and any contradictory 15 and/or 16 26(a)(2)(D)(ii) on or before July 1, 2015. rebuttal expert 17 disclosure authorized under Rule MOTION HEARING SCHEDULE 18 The last hearing date for a motion is December 14, 19 2015, commencing at 9:00 a.m. Any motion shall be briefed as 20 prescribed in Local Rule 230. 21 22 The parties are cautioned that an untimely motion characterized as a motion in limine may be summarily denied. 23 FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE 24 The final pretrial conference is set for February 8, 25 2016, 26 attorney who WILL TRY THE CASE for each party shall attend the 27 final pretrial conference. In addition, all persons representing at 2:30 p.m. The parties 28 2 are cautioned that the lead 1 themselves 2 pretrial conference. and appearing in propria persona must attend the 3 The parties shall file a JOINT pretrial statement no 4 later than seven (7) calendar days prior to the final pretrial 5 conference. 6 applicable portions of Local Rule 281(b), and shall set forth 7 each theory of liability (“claim”) and affirmative defense which 8 remains 9 theory/defense is based. Furthermore, each party shall estimate 10 the length of trial. The Court uses the parties’ joint pretrial 11 statement to prepare its final pretrial order and could issue the 12 final pretrial order without holding the scheduled final pretrial 13 conference. See Mizwicki v. Helwig, 196 F.3d 828, 833 (7th Cir. 14 1999) (“There is no requirement that the court hold a pretrial 15 conference.”). to The be joint tried, pretrial and the statement ultimate shall facts address on which the each 16 Final pretrial procedures are “critical for ‘promoting 17 efficiency and conserving judicial resources by identifying the 18 real issues prior to trial, thereby saving time and expense for 19 everyone.’” Friedman & Friedman, Ltd. v. Tim McCandless, Inc., 20 606 F.3d 494, 498 (8th Cir. 2010) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 21 Advisory 22 “Toward 23 conferences to weed out unmeritorious claims and defenses before 24 trial begins.” Smith v. Gulf Oil Co., 995 F.2d 638, 642 (6th Cir. 25 1993). The parties are therefore provided notice that a claim or 26 affirmative defense may be dismissed sua sponte if it is not 27 shown to be triable in the joint final pretrial statement. Cf. 28 Portland Retail Druggists Ass’n v. Kaiser Found. Health Plan, 662 Committee that end, Note Rule (1983 16 Amendment directs 3 to courts subdivision to use (c)). pretrial 1 F.2d 641, 645 (9th Cir. 1981) (indicating that a party shall be 2 provided 3 sufficient 4 proceed 5 Protective Comm., 770 F.2d 866, 869 (9th Cir. 1985) (stating “the 6 district court has . . . authority to grant summary judgment sua 7 sponte in the context of a final pretrial conference”). notice to to and justify trial); an opportunity having a Portsmouth claim to or Square, respond with affirmative Inc. v. facts defense S’holders 8 If feasible, at the time of filing the joint pretrial 9 statement counsel shall also email it in a format compatible with 10 WordPerfect to: geborders@caed.uscourts.gov. 11 TRIAL SETTING 12 Trial shall commence at 9:00 a.m. on May 17, 2016. 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 Dated: September 4, 2014 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?