Huerta v. Virga
Filing
22
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/8/2015 DISMISSING this action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED.(Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
GIORGINO HUERTA,
12
13
14
No. 2:14-cv-1419 DAD P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
TIM VIRGA,
15
Defendant.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights
18
action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction
19
for all purposes pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Local Rule 305(a). (See ECF No. 13.)
20
By order filed July 20, 2015, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and plaintiff was granted
21
thirty days leave to file an amended complaint. More than forty-five days from that date have
22
now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the
23
court’s order.
24
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice.
25
See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
26
Dated: September 8, 2015
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?