Huerta v. Virga

Filing 22

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/8/2015 DISMISSING this action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED.(Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

GIORGINO HUERTA,

12
13
14

No. 2:14-cv-1419 DAD P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

TIM VIRGA,

15

Defendant.

16
17

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights

18

action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction

19

for all purposes pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Local Rule 305(a). (See ECF No. 13.)

20

By order filed July 20, 2015, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and plaintiff was granted

21

thirty days leave to file an amended complaint. More than forty-five days from that date have

22

now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the

23

court’s order.

24

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice.

25

See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

26

Dated: September 8, 2015

27
28
1