Wood v. Southwest Airlines Co.
Filing
13
STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 11/4/14 ORDERING that the initial disclosures shall be completed by 11/10/2014. All discovery shall be completed by 10/1/2015. Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 6/1/201 5, and any rebuttal disclosures are due by 7/1/2015. All expert discovery shall be completed by 10/1/2015. All dispositive motions, except motions for continuances, temporary restraining orders or other emergency applications, shall be heard no late r than 10/9/2015. The Final Pretrial Conference is SET for 1/7/2016 at 03:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. The parties shall confer and file a joint pretrial conference statement by 12/17/2015. The Jury Trial is SET for 2/22/2016 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. The parties estimate a trial length of approximately five (5) days. Trial briefs are due by 2/8/2016. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CHARLES WOOD,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
No. 2:14-cv-01421 KJM CKD
v.
STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO., and
DOES 1 through 25, inclusive,1
ORDER
Defendants,
16
17
18
An initial scheduling conference was held in this case on October 30, 2014.
19
20
Timothy Ryan appeared for defendant; there was no appearance for plaintiff. Edward Schade,
21
1
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
The Ninth Circuit provides that “‘[plaintiffs] should be given an opportunity through discovery
to identify [] unknown defendants’” “in circumstances . . . ‘where the identity of the alleged
defendant[] [is] not [] known prior to the filing of a complaint.’” Wakefield v. Thompson, 177
F.3d 1160, 1163 (9th Cir. 1999) (quoting Gillespie v. Civiletti, 629 F.2d 637, 642 (9th Cir. 1980))
(modifications in the original). Plaintiff is warned, however, that such defendants will be
dismissed where “‘it is clear that discovery would not uncover the identities, or that the complaint
would be dismissed on other grounds.’” Id. (quoting Gillespie, 629 F.2d at 642). Plaintiff is
further warned that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), which states that the court must dismiss
defendants who have not been served within 120 days after the filing of the complaint unless
plaintiff shows good cause, is applicable to doe defendants. See Glass v. Fields, No. 1:09-cv00098-OWW-SMS PC, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97604 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2011); Hard Drive
Prods. v. Does, No. C 11-01567 LB, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109837, at *2-4 (N.D. Cal. Sep. 27,
2011).
1
1
attorney for plaintiff, participated in the preparation of the Joint Status Report, but failed to
2
appear at the scheduling conference.
3
Having reviewed the parties’ Joint Status Report filed on October 15, 2014, and
4
discussed a schedule for the case with counsel at the hearing, the court makes the following
5
orders:
6
I.
7
SERVICE OF PROCESS
All named defendants have been served and no further service is permitted without
8
leave of court, good cause having been shown.
9
II.
10
ADDITIONAL PARTIES/AMENDMENTS/PLEADINGS
Plaintiff is given thirty (30) days within which to file a First Amended Complaint.
11
No further joinder of parties or amendments to pleadings is permitted without leave of court,
12
good cause having been shown. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b); Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations,
13
Inc., 975 F.2d 604 (9th Cir. 1992).
14
III.
15
JURISDICTION/VENUE
Jurisdiction is predicated upon 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332 and 1441(e)(2). Jurisdiction and
16
venue are not disputed.
17
IV.
18
DISCOVERY
Initial disclosures as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) shall be
19
completed by November 10, 2014. All discovery shall be completed by October 1, 2015. In this
20
context, “completed” means that all discovery shall have been conducted so that all depositions
21
have been taken and any disputes relative to discovery shall have been resolved by appropriate
22
order if necessary and, where discovery has been ordered, the order has been obeyed. All
23
motions to compel discovery must be noticed on the magistrate judge’s calendar in accordance
24
with the local rules of this court. While the assigned magistrate judge reviews proposed
25
discovery phase protective orders, requests to seal or redact are decided by Judge Mueller as
26
discussed in more detail below. In addition, while the assigned magistrate judge handles
27
discovery motions, the magistrate judge cannot change the schedule set in this order, even in
28
connection with a discovery matter.
2
1
2
V.
DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESSES
All counsel are to designate in writing, file with the court, and serve upon all other
3
parties the name, address, and area of expertise of each expert that they propose to tender at trial
4
not later than June 1, 2015. The designation shall be accompanied by a written report prepared
5
and signed by the witness. The report shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B). By July 1,
6
2015, any party who previously disclosed expert witnesses may submit a supplemental list of
7
expert witnesses who will express an opinion on a subject covered by an expert designated by an
8
adverse party, if the party supplementing an expert witness designation has not previously
9
retained an expert to testify on that subject. The supplemental designation shall be accompanied
10
by a written report, which shall also comply with the conditions stated above.
11
Failure of a party to comply with the disclosure schedule as set forth above in all
12
likelihood will preclude that party from calling the expert witness at the time of trial. An expert
13
witness not appearing on the designation will not be permitted to testify unless the party offering
14
the witness demonstrates: (a) that the necessity for the witness could not have been reasonably
15
anticipated at the time the list was proffered; (b) that the court and opposing counsel were
16
promptly notified upon discovery of the witness; and (c) that the witness was promptly made
17
available for deposition.
18
For purposes of this scheduling order, an “expert” is any person who may be used
19
at trial to present evidence under Rules 702, 703 and 705 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, which
20
include both “percipient experts” (persons who, because of their expertise, have rendered expert
21
opinions in the normal course of their work duties or observations pertinent to the issues in the
22
case) and “retained experts” (persons specifically designated by a party to be a testifying expert
23
for the purposes of litigation). A party shall identify whether a disclosed expert is percipient,
24
retained, or both. It will be assumed that a party designating a retained expert has acquired the
25
express permission of the witness to be so listed. Parties designating percipient experts must state
26
in the designation who is responsible for arranging the deposition of such persons.
27
28
All experts designated are to be fully prepared at the time of designation to render
an informed opinion, and give the bases for their opinion, so that they will be able to give full and
3
1
complete testimony at any deposition taken by the opposing party. Experts will not be permitted
2
to testify at trial as to any information gathered or evaluated, or opinion formed, after deposition
3
taken subsequent to designation. All expert discovery shall be completed by October 1, 2015.
4
VI.
MOTION HEARING SCHEDULE
5
All dispositive motions, except motions for continuances, temporary restraining
6
orders or other emergency applications, shall be heard no later than October 9, 2015.2 The
7
parties may obtain available hearing dates by checking Judge Mueller’s page on the court’s
8
website.
9
10
All purely legal issues are to be resolved by timely pretrial motions. Local Rule
230 governs the calendaring and procedures of civil motions; the following provisions also apply:
11
(a)
The opposition and reply must be filed by 4:00 p.m. on the day due; and
12
(b)
When the last day for filing an opposition brief falls on a legal holiday, the
13
opposition brief shall be filed on the last court day immediately preceding the legal holiday.
14
Failure to comply with Local Rule 230(c), as modified by this order, may be deemed consent to
15
the motion and the court may dispose of the motion summarily. Brydges v. Lewis, 18 F.3d 651,
16
652-53 (9th Cir. 1994).
17
The court places a page limit of twenty (20) pages on all moving papers, twenty
18
(20) pages on oppositions, and ten (10) pages for replies. All requests for page limit increases
19
must be made through the courtroom deputy clerk at least fourteen (14) days prior to the filing of
20
the motion.
21
Prior to filing a motion in a case in which the parties are represented by counsel,
22
counsel shall engage in a pre-filing meet and confer to discuss thoroughly the substance of the
23
contemplated motion and any potential resolution. Plaintiff’s counsel should carefully evaluate
24
the defendant’s contentions as to deficiencies in the complaint and in many instances the party
25
considering a motion should agree to any amendment that would cure a curable defect. Counsel
26
should discuss the issues sufficiently so that if a motion of any kind is filed, including for
27
28
2
Note that this date may not correspond to a law and motion calendar date.
4
1
summary judgment, the briefing is directed only to those substantive issues requiring resolution
2
by the court. Counsel should resolve minor procedural or other non-substantive matters during
3
the meet and confer. A notice of motion shall contain a certification by counsel filing the
4
motion that meet and confer efforts have been exhausted, with a brief summary of meet and
5
confer efforts.
6
The parties are reminded that a motion in limine is a pretrial procedural device
7
designed to address the admissibility of evidence. The court looks with disfavor upon
8
dispositional motions presented at the Final Pretrial Conference or at trial in the guise of motions
9
in limine. Although all motions in limine must be filed in conjunction with the joint pretrial
10
statement, the court will hear only those motions it has identified to counsel before the hearing
11
date.
12
The parties are cautioned that failure to raise a dispositive legal issue that could
13
have been tendered to the court by proper pretrial motion prior to the dispositive motion cut-off
14
date may constitute waiver of such issue.
15
VII.
16
SEALING
No document will be sealed, nor shall a redacted document be filed, without the
17
prior approval of the court. If a document for which sealing or redaction is sought relates to the
18
record on a motion to be decided by Judge Mueller, the request to seal or redact should be
19
directed to her and not the assigned Magistrate Judge. All requests to seal or redact shall be
20
governed by Local Rules 141 (sealing) and 140 (redaction); protective orders covering the
21
discovery phase of litigation shall not govern the filing of sealed or redacted documents on the
22
public docket. The court will only consider requests to seal or redact filed by the proponent of
23
sealing or redaction. If a party plans to make a filing that includes material an opposing party has
24
identified as confidential and potentially subject to sealing, the filing party shall provide the
25
opposing party with sufficient notice in advance of filing to allow for the seeking of an order of
26
sealing or redaction from the court.
27
/////
28
/////
5
1
VIII.
2
FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
The Final Pretrial Conference is set for January 7, 2016, at 3:30 p.m. At least one
3
of the attorneys who will conduct the trial for each of the parties shall attend the Final Pretrial
4
Conference. If by reason of illness or other unavoidable circumstance a trial attorney is unable to
5
attend, the attorney who attends in place of the trial attorney shall have equal familiarity with the
6
case and equal authorization to make commitments on behalf of the client.
7
Counsel for all parties are to be fully prepared for trial at the time of the Final
8
Pretrial Conference, with no matters remaining to be accomplished except production of
9
witnesses for oral testimony. The parties shall confer and file a joint pretrial conference
10
statement by December 17, 2015. The provisions of Local Rule 281 shall apply with respect to
11
the matters to be included in the joint pretrial statement. In addition to those subjects listed in
12
Local Rule 281(b), the parties are to provide the court with the following:
13
14
- A plain, concise statement that identifies every non-discovery motion previously
tendered to the court and its resolution.
15
- A concise, joint list of undisputed core facts that are relevant to each claim.
16
Disputed core facts should then be identified in the same manner. The parties are reminded not to
17
identify every fact in dispute but only those disputed facts that are essential to the formulation of
18
each claim. Each disputed fact and undisputed fact should be separately numbered or lettered.
19
Where the parties are unable to agree on the core disputed facts, they should nevertheless list core
20
disputed facts in the above manner.
21
22
- Concise lists of disputed evidentiary issues that will be the subject of a party’s
motion in limine.
23
- Each party’s points of law, which concisely describe the legal basis or theory
24
underlying their claims and defenses. Points of law should reflect issues derived from the core
25
undisputed and disputed facts. Parties shall not include argument with any point of law; the
26
parties may include concise arguments in their trial briefs.
27
/////
28
/////
6
1
- A joint statement of the case in plain concise language, which will be read to the
2
jury during voir dire and at the beginning of the trial. The purpose of the joint statement is to
3
inform the jury what the case is about.
4
- The parties’ position on the number of jurors to be impaneled to try the case.
5
Discovery documents to be listed in the pretrial statement shall not include
6
documents to be used only for impeachment and in rebuttal.
7
The parties are reminded that pursuant to Local Rule 281 they are required to
8
attach to the Final Pretrial Conference Statement an exhibit listing witnesses and exhibits they
9
propose to offer at trial. After the name of each witness, each party shall provide a brief
10
statement of the nature of the testimony to be proffered. The parties may file a joint list or each
11
party may file separate lists. These list(s) shall not be contained in the body of the Final Pretrial
12
Conference Statement itself, but shall be attached as separate documents to be used as addenda to
13
the Final Pretrial Order.
14
Plaintiff’s exhibits shall be listed numerically. Defendant’s exhibits shall be listed
15
alphabetically. The parties shall use the standard exhibit stickers provided by the court: pink for
16
plaintiff and blue for defendant. In the event that the alphabet is exhausted, the exhibits shall be
17
marked “AA-ZZ”. However, if the amount of defendant exhibits exceeds “ZZ” exhibits shall be
18
then listed as A-3, A-4, A-5 etc. All multi-page exhibits shall be stapled or otherwise fastened
19
together and each page within the exhibit shall be numbered. The list of exhibits shall not include
20
excerpts of depositions to be used only for impeachment. In the event that plaintiff(s) and
21
defendant(s) offer the same exhibit during trial, that exhibit shall be referred to by the designation
22
the exhibit is first identified. The court cautions the parties to pay attention to this detail so that
23
all concerned, including the jury, will not be confused by one exhibit being identified with both a
24
number and a letter. The parties are encouraged to consult concerning exhibits and, to the extent
25
possible, provide joint exhibits, which shall be designated as JX and listed numerically, e.g., JX-
26
1, JX-2.
27
28
The Final Pretrial Order will contain a stringent standard for the offering at trial of
witnesses and exhibits not listed in the Final Pretrial Order, and the parties are cautioned that the
7
1
standard will be strictly applied. On the other hand, the listing of exhibits or witnesses that a
2
party does not intend to offer will be viewed as an abuse of the court’s processes.
3
4
Counsel shall produce all trial exhibits to Casey Schultz, the Courtroom Deputy,
no later than 3:00 p.m. on the Friday before trial.
5
6
Failure to comply with Local Rule 281, as modified by this order, may be grounds
for sanctions.
7
The parties also are reminded that pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of
8
Civil Procedure it will be their duty at the Final Pretrial Conference to aid the court in: (a) the
9
formulation and simplification of issues and the elimination of frivolous claims or defenses; (b)
10
the settling of facts that should properly be admitted; and (c) the avoidance of unnecessary proof
11
and cumulative evidence. Counsel must cooperatively prepare the joint Final Pretrial Conference
12
Statement and participate in good faith at the Final Pretrial Conference with these aims in mind.3
13
A failure to do so may result in the imposition of sanctions which may include monetary
14
sanctions, orders precluding proof, elimination of claims or defenses, or such other sanctions as
15
the court deems appropriate.
16
Concurrently with the filing of the Joint Final Pretrial Conference Statement,
17
counsel shall submit to chambers the word processable version of the Statement, in its entirety
18
(including the witness and exhibit lists) to: kjmorders@caed.uscourts.gov.
19
IX.
20
TRIAL SETTING
The jury trial is set for February 22, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. The parties estimate a trial
21
length of approximately five (5) days. Trial briefs are due by February 8, 2016.
22
X.
23
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
No settlement conference is currently scheduled. A settlement conference may be
24
set at the time of the Final Pretrial Conference or at an earlier time at the parties’ request. In the
25
event that an earlier settlement conference date or referral to the Voluntary Dispute Resolution
26
3
27
28
“If the pretrial conference discloses that no material facts are in dispute and that the undisputed
facts entitle one of the parties to judgment as a matter of law,” the court may summarily dispose
of the case or claims. Portsmouth Square v. Shareholders Protective Comm., 770 F.2d 866, 86869 (9th Cir. 1985).
8
1
Program (VDRP) is requested, the parties shall file said request jointly, in writing. Because the
2
case will be tried to a jury, all parties should be prepared to advise the court whether they will
3
stipulate to the trial judge acting as settlement judge and waive disqualification by virtue thereof.
4
Counsel are instructed to have a principal with full settlement authority present at
5
any Settlement Conference or to be fully authorized to settle the matter on any terms. Each judge
6
has different requirements for the submission of settlement conference statements; the appropriate
7
instructions will be sent to you after the settlement judge is assigned.
8
XI.
9
MODIFICATION OF STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER
The parties are reminded that pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil
10
Procedure, the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order shall not be modified except by leave of court
11
upon a showing of good cause. Agreement by the parties pursuant to stipulation alone does not
12
constitute good cause. Except in extraordinary circumstances, unavailability of witnesses or
13
counsel does not constitute good cause.
14
XII.
15
16
17
18
OBJECTIONS TO STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER
This Status Order will become final without further order of the court unless
objections are filed within fourteen (14) calendar days of service of this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: November 4, 2014.
19
20
21
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
9
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?