Creer v. City of Vallejo et al
Filing
15
ORDER SETTING STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/28/15 ORDERING that the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is SET for 10/30/2015 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DAD) before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd. Plaintiff shall file and serve a status report on or before 10/16/2015, and defendants shall file and serve a status report on or before 10/23/2015. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LATASHA NICOLE CREER,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:14-cv-1428 JAM DAD PS
Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF VALLEJO, et al.,
ORDER SETTING STATUS
(PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)
CONFERENCE
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
20
21
Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was, therefore, referred to the
undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
Defendant has filed an answer. Pursuant to the provisions of Rule 16 of the Federal Rules
of Civil Procedure, IT IS ORDERED that:
1. A Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is set for Friday, October 30, 2015, at
22
10:00 a.m., at the United States District Court, 501 I Street, Sacramento, California, in
23
Courtroom No. 27, before the undersigned.
24
2. Each party is required to appear at the Status Conference, either by counsel or, if
25
proceeding in propria persona, on her own behalf. Any party may appear at the status conference
26
telephonically if the party pre-arranges such appearance by contacting Pete Buzo, the courtroom
27
deputy of the undersigned magistrate judge, at (916) 930-4128, no later than 48 hours before the
28
Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference; a land line telephone number must be provided.
1
1
3. Plaintiff shall file and serve a status report on or before October 16, 2015, and
2
defendants shall file and serve a status report on or before October 23, 2015. Each party’s status
3
report shall address all of the following matters:
4
a.
Progress of service of process;
b.
Possible joinder of additional parties;
c.
Possible amendment of the pleadings;
d.
Jurisdiction and venue;
9
e.
Anticipated motions and the scheduling thereof;
10
f.
Anticipated discovery and the scheduling thereof, including disclosure of
expert witnesses;
g.
Future proceedings, including the setting of appropriate cut-off dates for
discovery and for law and motion, and the scheduling of a final pretrial
conference and trial;
h.
Modification of standard pretrial procedures specified by the rules due to
the relative simplicity or complexity of the action;
i.
Whether the case is related to any other case, including matters in
bankruptcy;
j.
Whether the parties will stipulate to the magistrate judge assigned to this
matter acting as settlement judge, waiving any disqualification by virtue of
his so acting, or whether they prefer to have a Settlement Conference
before another magistrate judge;
k.
Whether the parties intend to consent to proceed before a United States
Magistrate Judge; and
l.
Any other matters that may aid in the just and expeditious disposition of
this action.
5
6
7
8
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
/////
25
/////
26
/////
27
/////
28
/////
2
1
4. The parties are cautioned that failure to file a status report or failure to appear at the
2
status conference may result in an order imposing an appropriate sanction. See Local Rules 110
3
and 183.
4
Dated: August 28, 2015
5
6
7
8
DAD:6
Ddad1\orders.pro se\creer1428.ossc.docx
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?