Kirchner v. Shred-It USA, Inc. et al

Filing 20

STIPULATION and ORDER 19 signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 9/11/2014 extending defendant's deadline to file a responsive pleading to plaintiffs First Amended Complaint by 10/6/2014. (Kirksey Smith, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Mark P. Grajski (SBN 178050)
[e-mail]
400 Capitol Mall, Suite 2350
Sacramento, California 95814-4428
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Frederick T. Smith (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
Esther Slater McDonald (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
1075 Peachtree Street, N.E., Suite 2500
Atlanta, Georgia 30309-3962
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
FIRST ADVANTAGE LNS SCREENING
SOLUTIONS, INC.
THE DION-KINDEM LAW FIRM
Peter R. Dion-Kindem (SBN 95267)
[e-mail]
21550 Oxnard Street, Suite 900
Woodland Hills, California 91367
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MICHAEL KIRCHNER

17
18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
19
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
20
21

MICHAEL KIRCHNER, an individual, on behalf
of himself and all others similarly situated,

JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND
DEFENDANT FIRST ADVANTAGE’S
TIME TO FILE A RESPONSIVE
PLEADING TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT

Plaintiff,

22
23

Case No. 2:14-cv-01437-WBS-EFB

v.

25

SHRED-IT USA INC., a Delaware Corporation,
FIRST ADVANTAGE LNS SCREENING
SOLUTIONS, INC., and Does 1 through 10,

26

Defendants.

24

27
28

1
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
17921939v.1

1

Plaintiff MICHAEL KIRCHNER, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated

2

(collectively, “Plaintiff”) and Defendant FIRST ADVANTAGE LNS SCREENING SOLUTIONS, INC.

3

(“Defendant”), by and through their undersigned counsel and pursuant to Local Rule 143, hereby

4

stipulate as follows:

5
6
7
8
9

1.

Defendant’s current deadline to file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff’s First Amended

Complaint is September 22, 2014;
2.

The parties agreed to extend Defendant’s time to file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff’s

First Amended Complaint by two weeks.
3.

Defendant’s new deadline to file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff’s First Amended

10

Complaint is October 6, 2014.

11

DATE: September 10, 2014

Respectfully submitted,

12

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP

13
By: /s/ Mark P. Grajski
Mark P. Grajski
Frederick T. Smith, pro hac vice
Esther S. McDonald, pro hac vice

14
15
16

Attorneys for Defendant
FIRST ADVANTAGE LNS SCREENING
SOLUTIONS, INC.

17
18
19

DATE: September 10, 2014

THE DION-KINDEM LAW FIRM

20

By: /s/ Peter R. Dion-Kindem
Peter R. Dion-Kindem

21

Attorneys for Plaintiff
MICHAEL KIRCHNER

22
23
24
25
26

ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 11, 2014

27
28

2
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
17921939v.1