Florez v. Parent Advocates of Sacramento

Filing 6

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/29/2014 GRANTING 4 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff is GRANTED 28 days from the date of this order to file an amended complaint. (Donati, J)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

REINA E. FLOREZ,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

No. 2:14-cv-1448 KJM DAD PS

v.

ORDER

PARENT ADVOCATES OF
SACRAMENTO,

16

Defendant.

17
Plaintiff Reina Florez is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the

18
19

undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

20

On October 1, 2014, the undersigned issued an order dismissing plaintiff’s complaint and

21

granting plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint within twenty-eight days. (Dkt. No. 3.) On

22

October 27, 2014, plaintiff filed a motion for an extension of time to file her amended complaint

23

explaining that she had been incarcerated and did not promptly received the October 1, 2014

24

order. Good cause appearing, plaintiff’s motion will be granted.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

25

1. Plaintiff’s October 27, 2014 motion for an extension of time (Dkt. No. 4) is

26
27

granted.

28

/////
1

1
2
3

2. Plaintiff is granted twenty-eight days from the date of this order to file an
amended complaint.
3. Failure to comply with this order in a timely manner may result in a

4

recommendation that this action be dismissed.

5

Dated: October 29, 2014

6
7
8
9
10
11
12

DAD:6
Ddad1\orders.pro se\florez1448.eot.ord.docx

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2