State of California v. Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians

Filing 18

ORDER granting 3 Motion for TRO signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 06/18/2014. The States motion for a temporary restraining order is GRANTED without requiring the State to post security, and that the Tribe, and all of its officers, agents, s ervants, employees and attorneys and all persons acting under the Tribes direction and control, including both factions currently claiming to constitute the tribal government, are hereby ENJOINED AND RESTRAINED from: (1) Attempting to disturb, modif y or otherwise change the circumstances currently in effect with respect to operation of the Rolling Hills Casino in Corning, California. (2) Deploying any armed personnel of any nature within 100 yards from the Casino, the property on which the Casi no is located, and tribal properties surrounding the Casino including the nearby hotels, gas station, and RV park (collectively, Tribal Properties). (3) Possessing, carrying, displaying, or otherwise having firearms on the Tribal Properties. This or der will remain in effect until 6 p.m. on July 2, 2014 unless modified by the court before then, or extended by the court to continue in effect thereafter. Preliminary injunction hearing set for June 30, 2014. Any supplemental briefing advancing this position must be filed by June 23, and any opposition briefing by June 27; no brief shall exceed 20 pages. (Andrews, P)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Case No. 2:14-cv-01449-KJM/CMK STATE OF CALIFORNIA, v. Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER PASKENTA BAND OF NOMLAKI INDIANS, A FEDERALLY RECOGNIZED INDIAN TRIBE, Defendant. 19 20 Pending a hearing on plaintiff State of California’s (State) motion for preliminary 21 injunction, which the court sets for hearing on June 30, 2014 at 2 p.m., the court makes the 22 following findings of fact and conclusions of law: 23 24 25 1. The State and Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians (Paskenta or Tribe) entered into a class III gaming compact (Compact) on September 10, 1999. 2. The Compact includes provisions to protect the public health and safety. Under section 26 8.1.2 of the Compact, the Tribe agreed to ensure “the physical safety of Gaming Operation 27 patrons and employees, and any other person while in the Gaming Facility.” Section 10.1 of the 28 1 Order Granting Temporary Restraining Order 1 Compact provides: “The Tribe will not conduct Class III gaming in a manner that endangers the 2 public health, safety, or welfare . . . .” 3 3. An intra-tribal dispute now exists among Paskenta’s members. As a result of this 4 dispute, two factions claim tribal leadership rights and the right to possession and control of the 5 Rolling Hills Casino located in Corning, California (Casino). The intra-tribal dispute involves 6 armed factions and has taxed the resources of the Tehama County Sheriff’s Office, and thus poses 7 a threat to the public health, safety and welfare. 8 9 10 11 4. The court has jurisdiction over this case under section 1331 of title 28 of the United States Code because the State’s claim arises under federal statutes and the federal common law. See Cabazon Band of Mission Indians v. Wilson, 124 F.3d 1050 (9th Cir. 1997). 5. The State has made a strong showing that it is likely to prevail on the merits of its claim 12 because the ongoing tribal standoff and the threat of continued activity by armed factions at and 13 in the vicinity of the Casino breaches the Tribe’s duties under the Compact. 14 6. The State has no plain, speedy or adequate remedy at law to redress the injuries it will 15 suffer if the Tribe is not temporarily restrained and enjoined in the above described manner, 16 including but not limited to the threat of physical violence against residents of California and 17 members of the Tribe. 18 19 20 7. The equities clearly favor the State and its interests in protecting the public health, safety, and welfare. 8. Issuance of this temporary restraining order will serve the public interest by preserving 21 the status quo, and avoiding injury to the people of the State, until the State’s motion for 22 preliminary injunction can be heard and determined in due course. 23 24 25 9. The State has acted timely in seeking a temporary restraining order to preserve the status quo until its motion for preliminary injunction can be heard and determined. Based upon the forgoing findings of fact and conclusions of law, and good cause appearing, 26 it is hereby ordered that the State’s motion for a temporary restraining order is GRANTED 27 without requiring the State to post security, and that the Tribe, and all of its officers, agents, 28 servants, employees and attorneys and all persons acting under the Tribe’s direction and control, 2 Order Granting Temporary Restraining Order 1 including both factions or groups currently claiming to constitute the tribal government, are 2 hereby ENJOINED AND RESTRAINED from: 3 4 5 1. Attempting to disturb, modify or otherwise change the circumstances currently in effect with respect to operation of the Rolling Hills Casino in Corning, California. 2. Deploying any armed personnel of any nature within 100 yards from the Casino, the 6 property on which the Casino is located, and tribal properties surrounding the Casino including 7 the nearby hotels, gas station, and RV park (collectively, Tribal Properties). 8 3. Possessing, carrying, displaying, or otherwise having firearms on the Tribal Properties. 9 This order will remain in effect until 6 p.m. on July 2, 2014 unless modified by the court 10 before then, or extended by the court to continue in effect thereafter. FED. R. CIV. P. 65(b)(2). 11 At the preliminary injunction hearing on June 30, 2014, the court will entertain further 12 argument regarding whether the court should enter a broader injunction preventing any class III 13 gaming activity on Paskenta lands. 25 U.S.C. § 2710(d)(7)(A)(ii). Any supplemental briefing 14 advancing this position must be filed by June 23, and any opposition briefing by June 27; no brief 15 shall exceed 20 pages. 16 The U.S. Marshal for the Eastern District of California is directed to effect prompt service 17 of this order on the persons identified on the Amended Parties Service List filed by the State 18 (ECF 17). 19 SO ORDERED. 20 Dated: June 18, 2014. 21 22 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 24 25 26 27 28 3 Order Granting Temporary Restraining Order

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?