Johnson v. Rehman, et al.

Filing 20

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., on 11/5/14 ORDERING that the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is CONTINUED to 12/15/2014 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.. A further joint status report shall be filed no later than 14 days prior to the Status Conference. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 Scott Johnson, 10 11 12 13 14 Plaintiff, v. No. 2:14-cv-01454-GEB-AC ORDER CONTINUING STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE Azizur Rehman; Omar Ghaith; and Does 1-10, Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff states in the Joint Status Report (“JSR”) 17 filed October 27, 2014, that he “anticipates joining additional 18 parties.” (JSR 2:5, ECF No. 19.) This statement fails to comply 19 with Plaintiff’s obligation under Rule 16 to provide meaningful 20 information on when the referenced joinder would be sought. 21 26 Parties anticipating possible amendments . . . . have an unflagging obligation to alert the Rule 16 scheduling judge of the . . . timing of such anticipated amendments in their status reports so that the judge can consider whether such amendments may properly be sought solely under the Rule 15(a) standard, and whether structuring discovery pertinent to the parties’ decision whether to amend is feasible. 27 Jackson v. Laureate, Inc., 186 F.R.D. 605, 608 (E.D. Cal. 1999) 28 (emphasis added) (internal quotation marks omitted). 22 23 24 25 1 1 Therefore, the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference 2 scheduled 3 December 15, 2014, at 9:00 a.m. A further joint status report 4 shall be filed no later than fourteen (14) days prior to the 5 Status Conference, in which Plaintiff shall provide additional 6 information concerning the referenced joinder. 7 8 for hearing on November IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 5, 2014 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 10, 2014, is continued to

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?